Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Great celebrity wedding debate

Marriage party performances have divided stars

Great celebrity wedding debate

LEGENDARY singer Asha Bhosle sparked an intriguing debate when she disclosed her iconic elder sister, Lata Mangeshkar, had turned down over a million dollars to sing at a wedding.

Speaking on a dance reality show, Bhosle said, “She was offered one million dollars to sing at a wedding. They said, just come for two hours and attend the wedding. She replied, even if you give me five million dollars, I won’t come.” Someone else had offered both sisters millions of dollars to perform together at a wedding, but they refused.


“Didi asked me, ‘will you sing at a wedding?’ I said I won’t, and she then told the rep, ‘we will not sing even if you offer 10 crore dollars because we do not sing at weddings.’ That person was very disappointed,” she said.

Bollywood actor Kangana Ranaut echoed these sentiments and said she would never dance at a wedding for money.

The revelations came in the wake of tens of millions being spent on stars for the recent pre-wedding bash of Anant Ambani and Radhika Merchant. Rihanna reportedly charged seven million dollars for what turned out to be an underwhelming performance and performers such as Akon also got a huge sum for the same event.

Lead Asha Bhosle 973340 n Asha Bhosle

Many international stars have also been paid hefty sums to perform at lavish weddings hosted by Indian tycoons, including Jennifer Lopez at Sanjay Hinduja’s wedding in 2015 and Beyoncé at Isha Ambani’s prewedding celebrations in 2018.

While most Indian film stars and singers, including Shah Rukh Khan, accept big cash gifts to perform at weddings, there are others like the Bachchan family who will never take to the stage at similar functions. That is because there has always been a social stigma associated with those who perform for money at weddings, connected to ancient customs, where lower rungs of society did such performances for centuries.

But today, for most Indian celebrities, weddings are big business. Many movie stars accept money to attend weddings as guests, including high-profile ones that have taken place in London.

The number of celebrities refusing money to be part of wedding celebrations has dwindled significantly in recent years, and most will cash in at every given opportunity.

Performing at weddings arguably played a huge part in the collapse of the thriving British Asian music industry in the UK.

During the 1980s and 1990s, the UK had become the global bhangra capital.

However, rather than building on this remarkable success and tapping into the profitable live music scene in India during the 1990s pop industry boom, most British Asian acts chose to play it safe. They opted for regular incomes by performing at weddings and gigs in relatively small nightclubs.

Lead Rihanna credit Frazer Harrison Getty Images 054 Rihanna

When DJs started getting booked more than live bands at weddings, budgets for bands significantly dropped.

The reduced funding proved insufficient to sustain many singers and large bands, leading to the gradual fading of this once vibrant industry.

Meanwhile, a new generation of Punjabi artists in India, influenced by UK artists, cashed in on the live scene in their country, including much bigger weddings, and became major stars.

By the time British acts stepped out of the UK weddings comfort zone, they had been overtaken. The more established British Asian singers still fly to perform at weddings around the world, but that number is also dwindling, as Indian celebrities dominate that market.

Today, weddings remain a money-making opportunity for celebrities, whether they are for regular folks or extravagant affairs hosted by billionaires.

However, some celebrities still decline such invitations.

More For You

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment
ROOH: Within Her
ROOH: Within Her

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

DRAMATIC DANCE

CLASSICAL performances have been enjoying great popularity in recent years, largely due to productions crossing new creative horizons. One great-looking show to catch this month is ROOH: Within Her, which is being staged at Sadler’s Wells Theatre in London from next Wednesday (23)to next Friday (25). The solo piece, from renowned choreographer and performer Urja Desai Thakore, explores narratives of quiet, everyday heroism across two millennia.

Keep ReadingShow less
Lord Macaulay plaque

Amit Roy with the Lord Macaulay plaque.

Club legacy of the Raj

THE British departed India when the country they had ruled more or less or 200 years became independent in 1947.

But what they left behind, especially in Calcutta (now called Kolkata), are their clubs. Then, as now, they remain a sanctuary for the city’s elite.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Trump new world order brings Orwell’s 1984 dystopia to life

US president Donald Trump gestures while speaking during a “Make America Wealthy Again” trade announcement event in the Rose Garden at the White House on April 2, 2025 in Washington, DC

Getty Images

Comment: Trump new world order brings Orwell’s 1984 dystopia to life

George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four was the most influential novel of the twentieth century. It was intended as a dystopian warning, though I have an uneasy feeling that its depiction of a world split into three great power blocs – Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia – may increasingly now be seen in US president Donald Trump’s White House, Russian president Vladimir Putin’s Kremlin or China president Xi Jingping’s Zhongnanhai compound in Beijing more as some kind of training manual or world map to aspire to instead.

Orwell was writing in 1948, when 1984 seemed a distantly futuristic date that he would make legendary. Yet, four more decades have taken us now further beyond 1984 than Orwell was ahead of it. The tariff trade wars unleashed from the White House last week make it more likely that future historians will now identify the 2024 return of Trump to the White House as finally calling the post-war world order to an end.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why the Maharana will be fondly remembered

Maharana Arvind Singh Mewar at the 2013 event at Lord’s, London

Why the Maharana will be fondly remembered

SINCE I happened to be passing through Udaipur [in Rajasthan], I thought I would look up “Shriji” Arvind Singh Mewar.

He didn’t formally have a title since Indira Gandhi, as prime minister, abolished India’s princely order in 1971 by an amendment to the constitution. But everyone – and especially his former subjects – knew his family ruled Udaipur, one of the erstwhile premier kingdoms of Rajasthan.

Keep ReadingShow less
John Abraham
John Abraham calls 'Vedaa' a deeply emotional journey
AFP via Getty Images

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

YOUTUBE CONNECT

Pakistani actor and singer Moazzam Ali Khan received online praise from legendary Bollywood writer Javed Akhtar, who expressed interest in working with him after hearing his rendition of Yeh Nain Deray Deray on YouTube.

Keep ReadingShow less