Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Fraud investigator claims he was sacked for being white and probing crimes committed by Asians

A FRAUD investigator has claimed that he was sacked from his job by a scandal-hit council because he is white and the subjects of his investigation were Asians.

Mark Edmunds, 54, is suing for £529,000 in a race and sex discrimination case against the London borough of Tower Hamlets, The Times reported on Thursday (22)


Edmunds claims that he was removed from his £63,000-a-year job last year because he was "a white man investigating a service predominantly staffed by Bangladeshi employees where the allegations of corruption were predominantly against Bangladeshi employees."

Britain’s first Muslim mayor, Lutfur Rahman had won control of Tower Hamlets in October 2010 but was removed by a court for rigging his 2014 re-election. When BBC One programme Panorama investigation raised serious concerns about fraud in the borough, Edmunds worked on a review of the youth service, according to The Times.

The review found that Rahman had used youth grants to bribe voters.

Twelve Asian employees in senior positions were dismissed as a result of Edmunds' investigations.

Edmunds claims that was also threatened and harassed.

"The threats and intimidation were very real and serious given the history of many of those I was investigating (ie ex-gang members and drug dealers)," his witness statement said.

"Additionally, while conducting investigations I was regularly accused of being a racist and a bully, when all I was doing was my job, in an attempt to intimidate me and derail the investigation process."

Tower Hamlets removed Edmunds from the case, and he claims the council failed “to investigate the false and defamatory allegation” of racism against him because of the colour of his skin."

The hearing continues.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Migrants pay 60% more into NHS than their healthcare costs, analysis finds

The Immigration Health Surcharge is a fee that most people applying for eligible UK visas must pay as part of their immigration application. It is intended to contribute towards the cost of healthcare during their stay in the country.

Migrants pay 60% more into NHS than their healthcare costs, analysis finds

Highlights:

  • Migrants paying the IHS contributed at least 60% more to NHS finances than their estimated healthcare costs in 2023/24, including standard tax contributions.
  • The annual surcharge has risen from £200 to £1,035 for most visa applicants.
  • IHS revenue peaked at almost £2.5 billion in 2024/25.
  • The surcharge now accounts for more than 1 per cent of the NHS budget.
  • Revenue fell to £2.3 billion in 2025/26 as immigration numbers declined.
  • Around one-fifth of the NHS workforce comes from overseas, according to the Nuffield Trust fellow quoted in the report.

  • Migrants who pay to live and work in the UK are contributing substantially more to NHS finances than the estimated cost of the healthcare they receive, according to new analysis by the Nuffield Trust. The findings have reignited debate over immigration, healthcare funding and the purpose of the Immigration Health Surcharge (IHS).

    Keep ReadingShow less