Pramod Thomas is a senior correspondent with Asian Media Group since 2020, bringing 19 years of journalism experience across business, politics, sports, communities, and international relations. His career spans both traditional and digital media platforms, with eight years specifically focused on digital journalism. This blend of experience positions him well to navigate the evolving media landscape and deliver content across various formats. He has worked with national and international media organisations, giving him a broad perspective on global news trends and reporting standards.
RUSSIA has been expelled from the Qatar World Cup after being suspended from all international competitions "until further notice", FIFA and UEFA announced in a joint statement, while European football's governing body also ended its partnership with Russian energy giant Gazprom.
The men's team had been due to play in qualifying play-offs in March for the World Cup in Qatar later this year, while its women's side had qualified for the European Championship in England, to be held in July.
The announcement also affects Russian clubs involved in European competitions.
"FIFA and UEFA have today decided together that all Russian teams, whether national representative teams or club teams, shall be suspended from participation in both FIFA and UEFA competitions until further notice," read the joint statement from the governing bodies of world and European football.
The Russian men's team were scheduled to play Poland in a World Cup qualifying play-off semi-final on March 24, and might have faced Sweden or the Czech Republic on March 29 for a place at the finals in Qatar later this year.
But their three potential opponents insisted they would boycott the matches.
FIFA announced on Sunday (27) that Russian teams would be allowed to continue playing under the name of the Football Union of Russia, playing home games on neutral territory and behind closed doors, and with the Russian flag and anthem banned.
But those measures were dismissed as "totally unacceptable" by Polish FA president Cezary Kulesza, who added that Poland would not play their World Cup play-off with Russia, "no matter what the name of the team is."
FIFA changed its approach on Monday (28), kicking Russia out of the sport's showpiece tournament.
"Football is fully united here and in full solidarity with all the people affected in Ukraine," the statement added.
"Both presidents (Gianni Infantino and Aleksander Ceferin) hope that the situation in Ukraine will improve significantly and rapidly so that football can again be a vector for unity and peace amongst people."
Russia denounces suspension
The Russian Football Union denounced the suspension, saying the move was "discriminatory".
"It has an obvious discriminatory character and harms a huge number of athletes, coaches, employees of clubs and national teams, and most importantly, millions of Russian and foreign fans, whose interests international sports organisations must protect in the first place," it said in a statement.
The decisions come after a widespread outcry, with global players' union FIFPro on Monday releasing a statement saying it "strongly disagreed" with the initial measures taken by FIFA.
FIFPro criticised FIFA for not imposing stronger sanctions right away and said that participation of Russian teams in international competitions was now "not a possibility".
With other nations also coming out to say they would not play against Russia, FIFA and UEFA were left with little choice.
FIFA had to act quickly before the upcoming World Cup play-offs and with the draw for the tournament due to be held in Doha on April 1.
Russia were supposed to play the Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland in their group at the women's Euro in England in July.
"This is a powerful message from the international sporting community that we will not tolerate Putin's abhorrent assaults on freedom and liberty. Well done FIFA and UEFA," tweeted UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
UEFA ends Gazprom deal
Meanwhile, Spartak Moscow were scheduled to play RB Leipzig of Germany in the last 16 of the Europa League.
They were the only remaining Russian team in European competition this season.
"Even though we are of the opinion that sport fundamentally unites, we understand and support this decision," said Leipzig, who have received a bye into the quarter-finals.
FIFA, though, did not confirm if Poland would qualify directly for the final of their World Cup play-off path.
UEFA said it had ended its partnership with Gazprom, one of its main sponsors, "effective immediately".
Gazprom has been a key sponsor of UEFA since 2012 and was believed to have been paying around $45 million a year in a deal due to run until 2024.
Russian football federation president Alexander Dyukov, boss of Gazprom Neft, the petrol branch of Gazprom, is a member of the UEFA's executive committee.
German club Schalke also announced Monday it had prematurely ended its shirt sponsorship deal with Gazprom.
UEFA last week stripped the Russian city of Saint Petersburg of this season's Champions League final, moving the game on May 28 to Paris.
FUGITIVE businessman Nirav Modi, who has been in a UK prison for more than six years, has told a court there will be “sensational developments” when his extradition case to India resumes next month.
The 54-year-old appeared before High Court Judge Simon Tinkler at the Royal Courts of Justice in London on Friday in an unrelated civil case involving an unpaid loan of over USD 8 million to the Bank of India.
The judge rejected Modi’s request to delay the case on technical and medical grounds raised from prison. The matter is set to go to trial in January 2026.
“They (Bank of India) refer to my extradition… I'm still here. There will be some sensational developments, and I have never used these words before,” Modi said during a pre-trial review hearing.
Modi, wanted in India in connection with the estimated USD 2 billion Punjab National Bank fraud case, told the court he was “extremely hopeful” of being discharged or granted bail after the court agreed to consider new evidence despite what he called a “high bar”.
The UK’s Crown Prosecution Service confirmed that Modi “has lodged an application to reopen his (extradition) appeal”, with Indian authorities having already filed their response. The hearing is expected to take place towards the end of November.
Representing himself as a “litigant in person”, Modi read from handwritten notes as he addressed the judge. Prison officers stood nearby as he spoke about difficulties with his eyesight and delays in accessing a computer while in custody, which he said made the legal process unfair.
“I understand this is an adversarial process and they (Bank of India) can say anything against me. But they keep on making assumptions; I would say, spend one day in prison… there needs to be some basic common sense,” he said, appearing agitated during the hearing.
The Bank of India, represented by barrister Tom Beasley and RWK Goodman’s Milan Kapadia, is pursuing Modi’s personal guarantee related to a loan to Dubai-based Firestar Diamond FZE. They said that delaying the proceedings would be unfair as it would indefinitely postpone the bank’s claim.
“If he is extradited, he will likely remain in custody… He will also be in a different time zone,” Beasley told the court, adding that the bank “remains sceptical” about Modi’s “claimed lack of funds”.
Justice Tinkler ruled that maintaining the court timetable outweighed other factors and said that reasonable measures were being taken to ensure fairness in the case.
“It is clear that some (medical) issues do affect his ability to work and will, in all likelihood, affect his ability to participate in the trial without reasonable adjustments being made,” the judge said, referring to a confidential medical report.
He said the seven-day trial scheduled for January would allow enough time to accommodate Modi’s medical needs. The court was also informed that prison authorities would provide him with a computer within a week, and hard copies of legal documents would be sent before another pre-trial hearing in early December.
Modi’s in-person appearance followed a “production order” from the court, which led to logistical issues over his return to custody. He was moved from HMP Thameside in south London, where he has been held, to HMP Pentonville in north London.
The businessman requested that the court note his preference for a single cell, but the judge said this was beyond the court’s jurisdiction. However, the judge directed that all his papers be transferred with him or that he be returned to Thameside soon.
Modi has been in prison since his arrest in March 2019 and has repeatedly been denied bail on grounds that he poses a flight risk, most recently in May this year.
He faces three criminal cases in India: one by the Central Bureau of Investigation related to the PNB fraud, another by the Enforcement Directorate over alleged money laundering, and a third for alleged interference with witnesses and evidence.
In April 2021, then UK Home Secretary Priti Patel ordered his extradition after a prima facie case was established. Modi had exhausted all legal challenges until his recent application to reopen the appeal was accepted. The case is set to be heard next month.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.