Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Families seeking asylum face 'dire conditions’

Human Rights Watch report says people placed in hotel accommodation are facing serious ‘habitability problems'

Families seeking asylum face 'dire conditions’

FAMILIES seeking asylum in the UK face inadequate living conditions in government-provided temporary housing, affecting their mental and physical health and access to children's education, Human Rights Watch said Thursday (14).

Releasing a new 100-page report based on joint research with UK human rights group Just Fair, HRW said they found the "dire" living conditions were the result of "longstanding policy failings".

The rights organisations said they interviewed more than 50 asylum seekers, including 27 children, who were living in or had recently left temporary housing in England.

Many said they had spent months in temporary housing despite a government target to move families to longer-term accommodation within 19 days, according to the report.

The report said it found that people placed in hotel accommodation were facing "serious habitability problems", including a lack of space, dampness, mould, broken or missing furniture and pest infestations.

It added that families struggle to provide their children with an adequate diet without access to cooking facilities and children face barriers in accessing education as local schools may not allow them to enrol immediately.

"Inhumane and inadequate housing for people seeking safety is never acceptable, and certainly not in the world's sixth-largest economy," said Yasmine Ahmed, UK director at Human Rights Watch.

"Instead of recklessly wasting resources on grudging, deficient, and short-sighted responses, the UK government should redirect its funding toward suitable long-term housing and social support," she added.

Controversy

The government is trying to reduce what it calls "illegal" migration to the UK - a highly contentious political issue in the country - and is under pressure to stop migrants making dangerous crossings of the Channel in small boats.

It has introduced controversial legislation barring asylum claims by all arrivals via the Channel and other "illegal routes", also mandating their transfer to third countries, such as Rwanda.

But both policies are on hold amid a court challenge over the legality of sending migrants to east Africa.

The government is also trying to lower the costs of hotel accommodation for asylum seekers and instead wants to use barges, disused military bases and even tents.

Last month, the UK controversially began housing adult men onboard the "Bibby Stockholm" barge off the southwest English coast but in an embarrassing setback had to remove them within days after Legionella bacteria was found in the water on board.

Human Rights Watch and Just Fair said that "barges, barracks, and similar large-scale institutionalised settings share the serious shortcomings of repurposed hotels and should not be used as asylum housing in the UK".

"Instead, people seeking asylum should be supported to find their own housing in communities they choose and should be allowed to work as long as their cases are being considered, the approach used in the UK until 1999."

(AFP)

More For You

Falklands sovereignty row erupts days before King Charles meets Trump

No 10 was quick to respond, with the prime minister's spokesman saying the government "could not be clearer" on its stance

Getty Images

Falklands sovereignty row erupts days before King Charles meets Trump

Highlights

  • A Pentagon email reported by Reuters suggested the US was considering reviewing its support for UK sovereignty over the Falklands.
  • Downing Street said sovereignty "rests with the UK" and the islanders' right to self-determination is "paramount".
  • Report emerged just three days before King Charles and Queen Camilla are due to meet Trump at the White House.
A report suggesting the US may be rethinking its position on the Falkland Islands has sparked a strong response from Downing Street, coming just days before King Charles and Queen Camilla head to Washington to meet president Donald Trump.
An internal Pentagon email, reported by Reuters, suggested the US was looking at ways to put pressure on Nato allies it felt had not supported its war in Iran.
One of the options discussed was a review of American backing for British sovereignty over the Falklands.
No 10 was quick to respond, with the prime minister's spokesman saying the government "could not be clearer" on its stance.
"Sovereignty rests with the UK and the islanders' right to self-determination is paramount," he told BBC, adding that this had been "expressed clearly and consistently to successive US administrations."
He was firm that "nothing is going to change that."
The Falkland Islands government backed London's position, saying it had "complete confidence" in the UK's commitment to defending its right to self-determination.
Previous US administrations have recognised Britain's administration of the islands but have stopped short of formally backing its sovereignty claim.

Political reaction grows

The report triggered sharp reactions from across British politics. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch called the reported US position "absolute nonsense", adding: "We need to make sure that we back the Falklands.

They are British territory." Reform UK's Nigel Farage said the matter was "utterly non-negotiable" and confirmed he would raise it with Argentina's president Javier Milei when they meet later this year.

Keep ReadingShow less