Trump nominates Harmeet Dhillon for top Department of Justice role
“I am pleased to nominate Harmeet K Dhillon as assistant attorney general for civil rights at the US Department of Justice,” Trump announced on Monday on Truth Social.
Harmeet Dhillon gives a benediction at the end of the first day of the 2024 Republican National Convention at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on July 15, 2024. (Photo: Getty Images)
By EasternEyeDec 10, 2024
US PRESIDENT-ELECT Donald Trump has nominated Indian-American attorney Harmeet K Dhillon as assistant attorney general for civil rights at the Department of Justice.
“I am pleased to nominate Harmeet K Dhillon as assistant attorney general for civil rights at the US Department of Justice,” Trump announced on Monday on Truth Social, his social media platform.
Dhillon, a Sikh, graduated from Dartmouth College and the University of Virginia Law School. She has clerked for the US Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.
“Throughout her career, Harmeet has stood up consistently to protect our cherished civil liberties, including taking on big tech for censoring our free speech, representing Christians who were prevented from praying together during Covid, and suing corporations who use woke policies to discriminate against their workers,” Trump said.
He described her as “one of the top election lawyers in the country,” noting her efforts to ensure that “all, and ONLY, legal votes are counted.” Trump also highlighted Dhillon's role as a respected member of the Sikh religious community and said she would enforce civil rights and election laws “fairly and firmly” in her new position.
Dhillon has previously faced racial attacks, including an incident after she recited Ardas at the Republican National Convention in July. Last year, she ran unsuccessfully for the position of Republican National Committee chair.
Born in Chandigarh, Dhillon, 54, moved to the US as a child with her family. In 2016, she became the first Indian-American to appear on stage at the GOP Convention in Cleveland.
Expressing her gratitude for the nomination, Dhillon wrote on X, “I'm extremely honoured by President Trump's nomination to assist with our nation's civil rights agenda. It has been my dream to be able to serve our great country, and I am so excited to be part of an incredible team of lawyers led by @PamBondi. I cannot wait to get to work!”
She also credited her family, saying, “I would not be here today without my amazing mother and brother's support, and my beloved father Tejpal and husband Sarv, who did not live to see this day. I hope I will honour their memories, with God's grace.”
HOME SECRETARY Shabana Mahmood is under pressure to immediately enforce stricter immigration rules as large numbers of migrants approach the point at which they can settle permanently in Britain.
Government figures revealed that from next year about 270,000 migrants will qualify for indefinite leave to remain (ILR), the legal right to stay in the UK. The number is expected to rise sharply, reaching more than 600,000 by 2028, reported the Times.
The so-called “Boriswave” of migration followed the introduction of former prime minister Boris Johnson’s post-Brexit immigration system in 2021. After travel slowed during the pandemic, net migration rose to record levels, peaking at 906,000 in 2023. Last year 172,798 people were granted ILR, the highest number since 2010.
Chris Philp, the Conservative shadow home secretary, said the government must act now. “Over the next two or three years, very large numbers who came in 2021, 2022 and 2023 are all going to become eligible for ILR,” he told the Times. “The government should immediately extend the qualifying period for ILR to ten years, including people who are here already. ILR should also only be given to people who are making an economic contribution. Those who are not should be required to go home.”
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch admitted her party “got it wrong” under Johnson by allowing record migration levels and promised that the Conservatives would push for tighter rules than Labour.
But others argue that fairness must be shown to migrants who came under the existing system and paid high visa and health surcharge fees in expectation of settlement after five years.
Marley Morris, head of immigration at the Institute for Public Policy Research, said the government should avoid applying the new rules retrospectively. “It seems only fair that the ten-year waiting period should only apply to new arrivals,” Morris was quoted as saying. “This reflects a core British principle that policies should not apply backwards.”
The issue is particularly sensitive for more than 180,000 Hongkongers who arrived in the UK under the British National (Overseas) visa route after China imposed its national security law.
MPs from Labour and the Liberal Democrats have warned that changing the rules midway would betray commitments made to those families and risk giving propaganda victories to Beijing.
David Pinto-Duschinsky, Labour MP for Hendon, said many BNO holders were planning their futures in Britain. “They are absolutely committed to our country for the long term,” he said. “When they applied in 2021, it was on the basis of a five-year ILR period. Extending that now will create great uncertainty and hardship.”
Madeleine Sumption of the University of Oxford’s Migration Observatory noted that while not all temporary visa holders will stay, “we expect a large increase in settlement applications over the next few years” because many are extending their stays.
Meanwhile, migration across the Channel continues. On Tuesday (9), a woman died after a dinghy got into difficulty, with more than 200 people making the crossing that day. The total for this year has already passed 30,300.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Former US vice president Kamala Harris speaks at the Emerge 20th Anniversary Gala in San Francisco, California, on April 30, 2025. (Photo by CAMILLE COHEN/AFP via Getty Images)
FORMER US vice president Kamala Harris said it was "recklessness" to let Joe Biden run for a second term as president, in an excerpt released on Wednesday (10) from her upcoming memoir.
She also lashed out at White House staff whom she accused of failing to support her -- and sometimes actively hindering her -- while she was Biden's deputy,
"'It’s Joe and Jill’s decision.' We all said that, like a mantra, as if we’d all been hypnotized. Was it grace, or was it recklessness? In retrospect, I think it was recklessness," Harris said in the first extract from 107 Days, published by The Atlantic magazine.
"The stakes were simply too high. This wasn’t a choice that should have been left to an individual’s ego, an individual’s ambition. It should have been more than a personal decision."
Biden stunned the world by dropping out of the race in July 2024 after a disastrous debate with Trump sparked questions about his age and mental acuity.
Harris denied that there had been any conspiracy to hide Biden's condition but said it was clear there were issues with his age.
"On his worst day, he was more deeply knowledgeable, more capable of exercising judgment, and far more compassionate than Donald Trump on his best," she wrote.
"But at 81, Joe got tired. That’s when his age showed in physical and verbal stumbles."
Harris also lashed out at White House staff whom she said failed to support her when she was vice president, saying that Biden's team did not want her to outshine her boss.
"When the stories were unfair or inaccurate, the president’s inner circle seemed fine with it. Indeed, it seemed as if they decided I should be knocked down a little bit more," Harris wrote.
She added that she had "shouldered the blame" for Biden's border policy, which Trump capitalised on in the election.
Harris lost comprehensively to Republican Trump after the shortest presidential campaign in modern US history lasting just over three months -- the 107 days in the title of her memoir.
(AFP)
Keep ReadingShow less
Manoj, from Frisco, Texas, created an innovation called ‘Shield Seniors’, a website designed to help people over 60 identify and report fraudulent messages and emails. (Photo credit: LinkedIn/Tejasvi Manoj)
SEVENTEEN-year-old Indian-American Tejasvi Manoj has been named Time magazine’s ‘Kid of the Year’ for 2025 for her work on protecting senior citizens from online scams.
Manoj, from Frisco, Texas, created an innovation called ‘Shield Seniors’, a website designed to help people over 60 identify and report fraudulent messages and emails.
“Older Americans clearly need protection, and Tejasvi was determined to provide it,” Time said while announcing the recognition. It added that her work earned her the title of TIME’s Kid of the Year for 2025.
She is also the first honouree to be recognised as a TIME for Kids Service Star, part of a programme by the magazine’s sister publication highlighting young people making an impact.
Shield Seniors “educates the 60-plus demographic about what online scams look like, analyse suspicious emails and messages users upload, and, if the communications prove fraudulent, provide links to report them,” Time said.
“The site is currently available in a private preview mode only, pending more R&D and fundraising, but is already — like its creator — making itself known,” it added.
In an interview with Time, Manoj said: “Just make sure to check up on your loved ones. Make sure that they're staying safe online.”
Manoj began coding in eighth grade. She was given an honourable mention in the 2024 Congressional App Challenge, delivered a 2025 TEDx talk in Plano, Texas, about the need to build “digital bridges” to all demographics, and has visited assisted-living facilities, according to the magazine.
She plans to study computer science with a minor in AI or cybersecurity.
Time noted that Manoj continues to advocate for seniors to become “savvy and independent” online, and for families to help them build confidence. Shield Seniors is still in development and runs on a free AI engine, limiting its capacity and reach. Manoj is raising funds to transition to a commercial AI platform.
“We plan to open it to a wider audience once we secure funding to support broader access,” she told the magazine.
Alongside her project, Manoj is active in Scouting America, plays the violin in her school orchestra, and tutors Bhutanese refugees in math and English through Vibha, a nonprofit working on education and workforce development in India, the report said.
She also volunteers with the North Texas Food Bank Young Advocates Council. “I started volunteering in sixth grade,” she said. “I think it’s really important; if you’re lucky yourself, you want to make sure other people feel loved and lucky too.”
In 2020, Indian-American scientist and inventor Gitanjali Rao was the first recipient of the ‘Kid of the Year’ award for her work using technology to address issues including contaminated drinking water, opioid addiction and cyberbullying.
THE head of the police inspectorate has said that non-crime hate incidents should be scrapped, arguing that officers must draw a clear line between what is offensive and what is criminal.
Sir Andy Cooke, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary, made the comments as he released his annual report on the state of policing in England and Wales. He said that while much of the public expect officers to tackle serious crime and anti-social behaviour, too much time is being spent on matters that do not amount to criminality.
“Police still need to get the basics right and focus on the issues that matter to the public,” Sir Andy said. “I think we need to separate the offensive from the criminal. We need, at times, to allow people to speak openly without the fear that their opinions will put them on the wrong side of the law.”
More than 130,000 such incidents have been recorded in England and Wales, and while they do not appear on criminal records, they can show up on enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service checks.
Critics say the system has a chilling effect on free speech. In one case, officers recorded an incident when someone refused to shake another person’s hand in a gender identity dispute. In another, a doctor was spoken to after allegedly misdiagnosing a patient.
The issue has gained fresh attention following the arrest of comedy writer Graham Linehan, who was detained by armed officers last week over online comments.
Sir Andy described the action as “heavy handed” and warned it risked damaging public confidence. “Police officers should always use common sense … was it a great public optic? No, it wasn’t,” he said. “Lessons will be learned but it makes the policing job harder when these things occur.”
He added that while much offensive material circulates online, the police should only be concerned with tackling threats and genuine criminality. “I’m a firm believer that non-crime hate incidents are no longer required, and that intelligence can be gathered in a different way which causes less concern to the public and is easier for policing,” he was quoted as saying.
Sir Mark Rowley, commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, backed Sir Andy’s view. He said successive governments had failed to provide clear rules on dealing with social media posts, leaving officers “between a rock and a hard place”. He added: “We think we need more flexibility … and I agree that non-crime hate incidents should no longer be recorded.”
Sir Andy’s report also highlighted that although forces have made improvements over the past year, public trust remains low. He urged the government to fully fund its “safer streets” mission, which aims to cut knife crime and reduce violence against women and girls.
“This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to start the reform policing needs,” he said. “It will be a missed opportunity if it is not properly funded from the start.”
Keep ReadingShow less
The Office for Students welcomed the move, saying more universities may look at mergers as many face financial difficulties. (Photo credit: University of Kent)
THE UNIVERSITIES of Kent and Greenwich will merge in 2026 to form the UK’s first regional “super-university”.
The new institution, to be called the London and South East University Group, will have one vice-chancellor and around 50,000 students, the BBC reported.
The Office for Students welcomed the move, saying more universities may look at mergers as many face financial difficulties.
According to reports, 40 per cent of English universities are now in deficit. The University and College Union (UCU) warned the merger would “almost certainly” lead to redundancies. UCU general secretary Jo Grady said it was “a takeover by Greenwich” as Kent was “on the brink of insolvency”.
The Department for Education said ministers “welcome innovative approaches such as this one”. Kent’s interim leader Prof Georgina Randsley de Moura will stay in post until the merger, when Greenwich vice-chancellor Prof Jane Harrington will lead the new university.
Both universities said the merger would strengthen finances. Prof Harrington told BBC: “This is about taking the best of both universities and saying what do we want to offer to our communities.”
Students will continue applying to Kent or Greenwich separately, and degrees will retain the universities’ names. Both institutions said there were no immediate job loss plans, though each has recently made cuts.
The merger will cover campuses in Canterbury, Medway, Greenwich and Avery Hill. The OfS said it would ensure students’ studies are not disrupted.