Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Only 13 major UK companies disclose racial pay disparity

Only 13 major UK companies disclose racial pay disparity

MOST of the top companies in the UK appear reluctant to come out with ethnicity pay reporting, going by the sluggishness in their disclosures.

Just 13 of the 100 companies featured in the benchmark FTSE100 index have revealed racial pay disparities, The Guardian reported ahead of Monday’s (20) parliamentary debate on making ethnicity pay gap reporting mandatory.


Real estate investment major British Land, which is one the companies to make the disclosure, reported a 27 per cent pay gap between white British and ethnic minority employees, while NatWest admitted to an overall 14 per cent median pay disparity.

British Telecom disclosed a lower mean pay gap of 5.7 per cent.

Major companies like Next and Unilever are yet to make disclosures on pay disparity, while Aviva said it would come with data later this year, the report said.

According to Office of National Statistics data for 2019, most minority ethnic groups earn less on average than white British people.

However, the figures show that some groups including Indians earned significantly more than their white British counterparts.

With a mean pay of £14.43 per hour, the Indian group earned 16 per cent more than the average £12.49 white British employees were paid. Indians were in the third position in the ladder, behind white Irish and Chinese groups who earned mean hourly pay of £17.55 and £15.38 respectively in 2019.

On the other hand, Pakistanis were at the bottom of the list of 17 ethnic groups, earning £10.55 per hour and Bangladeshis fared better with an hourly pay of £10.58.

“Open and transparent reporting on pay gaps is an important step towards creating fairer and more inclusive workplaces”, Chartered Institute of Professional Development said in a report.

Employers in the UK with more than 250 staff are required by law to publish their gender pay gap information, but ethnicity pay reporting is not yet compulsory.

More For You

Elon Musk and Sam Altman
Musk vs Altman: $134bn battle over OpenAI’s future heads to court
Getty Images / Edited in Canva

Musk vs OpenAI: Is the $134bn battle driven by rivalry as company claims?

  • Elon Musk accuses OpenAI of abandoning its non-profit mission
  • Trial could shape control, structure and future of one of AI’s biggest players
  • Top tech figures, including Microsoft’s CEO, expected to testify

A long-running dispute between Elon Musk and Sam Altman has now reached a courtroom in California, setting the stage for one of the most closely watched trials in the tech world. The case, centred on the direction and control of OpenAI, begins with jury selection in Oakland and is expected to run for up to three weeks.

At its core, the lawsuit questions whether OpenAI drifted away from its original purpose. Musk claims the company he co-founded in 2015 as a non-profit has shifted into a profit-driven enterprise, breaching its founding principles. He has named Altman, OpenAI president Greg Brockman and major partner Microsoft in the case, accusing them of breach of contract and unjust enrichment.

Keep ReadingShow less