Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

‘Many stop-and-search scrutiny panels have few or no BAME members'

‘Many stop-and-search scrutiny panels have few or no BAME members'

Few or no members from minority ethnic backgrounds feature in some of the UK’s police panels set up to scrutinise stop-and-search incidents, a recent media report claimed. 

In Staffordshire only one out of 86 people who sit on the independent police scrutiny panels across the force’s Neighbourhood Policing Teams is from a minority ethnic background, according to data obtained by Observer. It further adds that all 12 members of Dyfed-Powys Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner’s Quality Assurance panel are white. 


Similarly, there are no black people on Lancashire constabulary’s eight-member countywide community stop-and-search scrutiny panel, said the Sunday (13) report.

Community scrutiny panels are supposed to have “sufficient” representation of marginalised groups and individuals most affected by stop-and-search, including those from ethnic minority backgrounds, according to guidance from the College of Policing. 

Just over half of all police forces responded to the request for information, suggesting that more forces may have a similar problem. However, out of the 22 forces that provided figures, the majority of panels were found to have fair levels of representation, with nine having at least half of their members identifying as non-white.

Black people are nine times more likely to be stopped and searched than white people in England and Wales, according to the most recent figures, due to which campaigners have been warning that police legitimacy will be undermined in areas if they don’t have a representative community panel challenging contentious encounters.

“Having a diverse panel, which can bring a variety of life experiences into the scrutiny role, is a crucial part of building legitimacy and holding the police to account,” Nina Champion, director of the Criminal Justice Alliance, a coalition of 160 organisations, said.

Another report earlier this year by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary said stop-and-search was disproportionately used on certain ethnic groups without apparent evidence as to why, with one in 10 stops were based on intelligence, most of the time relying on “officers’ suspicions”.

Meanwhile, Staffordshire Commissioner’s Office and Dyfed-Powys Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner have said in different statements that they are committed and attempting to make their scrutiny panels accurately reflect the diversity of their communities.

More For You

Falklands sovereignty row erupts days before King Charles meets Trump

No 10 was quick to respond, with the prime minister's spokesman saying the government "could not be clearer" on its stance

Getty Images

Falklands sovereignty row erupts days before King Charles meets Trump

Highlights

  • A Pentagon email reported by Reuters suggested the US was considering reviewing its support for UK sovereignty over the Falklands.
  • Downing Street said sovereignty "rests with the UK" and the islanders' right to self-determination is "paramount".
  • Report emerged just three days before King Charles and Queen Camilla are due to meet Trump at the White House.
A report suggesting the US may be rethinking its position on the Falkland Islands has sparked a strong response from Downing Street, coming just days before King Charles and Queen Camilla head to Washington to meet president Donald Trump.
An internal Pentagon email, reported by Reuters, suggested the US was looking at ways to put pressure on Nato allies it felt had not supported its war in Iran.
One of the options discussed was a review of American backing for British sovereignty over the Falklands.
No 10 was quick to respond, with the prime minister's spokesman saying the government "could not be clearer" on its stance.
"Sovereignty rests with the UK and the islanders' right to self-determination is paramount," he told BBC, adding that this had been "expressed clearly and consistently to successive US administrations."
He was firm that "nothing is going to change that."
The Falkland Islands government backed London's position, saying it had "complete confidence" in the UK's commitment to defending its right to self-determination.
Previous US administrations have recognised Britain's administration of the islands but have stopped short of formally backing its sovereignty claim.

Political reaction grows

The report triggered sharp reactions from across British politics. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch called the reported US position "absolute nonsense", adding: "We need to make sure that we back the Falklands.

They are British territory." Reform UK's Nigel Farage said the matter was "utterly non-negotiable" and confirmed he would raise it with Argentina's president Javier Milei when they meet later this year.

Keep ReadingShow less