Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

‘Leadbeater, not Labour, won Batley and Spen’

‘Leadbeater, not Labour, won Batley and Spen’

“BATLEY and Spen” were the words on the rosette of a pumped-up Labour leader, Sir Keir Starmer, and “Battered and Spent” on a frazzled prime minister Boris Johnson’s.

The Times cartoonist had clearly prepared his material so it could be flipped, either way, depending on the actual result. And by 323 votes, Labour retained the seat vacated by Tracy Brabin who had stood down when she was elected as the regional mayor for West Yorkshire.


By-elections are strange events –constituencies dominate national news briefly before sinking back into the comfortable normality of everyday life. Sadly, the good people of Batley and Spen may feel they have had more than their fair share of them.

The murder of Labour MP Jo Cox precipitated the first in 2016. She was a charismatic young woman – respected in parliament and loved in the constituency – who had been elected for just one year before her savage murder by a far-right extremist. It was her sister Kim Leadbeater who stood for Labour in this latest by-election.

Jo’s defining speech in the House of Commons concluded with the words, “we have more in common than divides us”.

It forms the motto on the plaque in the Commons Chamber above where she once sat. Sadly, that legacy was not honoured by her sister’s by-election campaign.

The arrival of George Galloway as a candidate for the seat ensured that. His campaign aides appear never to have heard the maternal dictum, “if you can’t say something nice, say nothing at all”.

They spread a toxic cocktail of homophobia, grievances over conflicts from the Middle East to Kashmir, and a direct invitation to oust Starmer as Labour leader.

Galloway’s message was a sectarian one that focused on the Muslim community and pitched it directly against the Labour party it had previously largely supported.

Having just lost the Hartlepool seat, Batley and Spen was now touted as a defining challenge to Labour’s leader. A seat that the party had won in every election since 1997, Batley and Spen was to be retained at all costs, it seems. But that cost came too high. Labour won the by-election, but the party lost its way.

When the Conservatives played divisive politics and Labour’s London mayor Sadiq Khan was targeted with vile anti-Muslim messages circulated in Hindu WhatsApp groups, Labour’s response was to seize the moral high ground, to focus on the issues of housing, police and transport, and to refuse to respond in kind. That was the right way to handle sectarianism.

In Batley and Spen, those in charge of Labour’s campaign made the opposite and disastrous choice. They descended into the gutter of sectarianism and put out a leaflet urging Islamic voters not to risk an MP “who is not on your side”.

The photograph of Johnson shaking hands with India’s prime minister Narendra Modi and the text which accompanied it specifically referred to human rights abuses in Kashmir.

That leaflet did not win Batley and Spen for Labour. What won was the strength and guts of Leadbeater who had stood up to one of Galloway’s henchmen on camera and made him look like the misogynistic bully he was. She is a local woman respected in the town and liked by local women who go to her pilates fitness classes. Leadbeater won Batley and Spen; Labour did not.

The Labour campaign managers allowed the short-term need to shore up Starmer’s leadership to outrank our party policy. That policy is clear – Kashmir is an exclusively bilateral matter for India and Pakistan to resolve, and should not be imported into politics in the UK to divide communities on sectarian lines. Policy should always outrank politicking, not the other way round.

The Labour Friends of India immediately condemned the leaflet and demanded it be withdrawn. That was the right thing to do. I have called on the general secretary of the party to repudiate the leaflet. That would be the right thing for him to do.

As for Starmer’s leadership, the national press have run with the headline ‘Labour is back’ and it looks secure. But he should acknowledge that the Batley and Spen leaflet was a mistake; that it was against party policy and that such divisive politics is and was indefensible.

True leadership is about more than winning by-elections. It is about having the moral authority that comes from knowing what your principles are and standing by them.

More For You

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

King Charles III, patron of the Royal Horticultural Society, walks through the RHS and BBC Radio 2 Dog Garden during a visit to the RHS Chelsea Flower Show at Royal Hospital Chelsea on May 20, 2025 in London, England.

Getty Images

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

Rashmita Solanki

This particular year at the Royal Horticultural Society’s Chelsea Flower Show, there have been two members of the Royal Family who have had roses named after them.

‘The King’s Rose’, named after King Charles III, and ‘Catherine’s Rose’, named after Catherine, Princess of Wales. Both roses have been grown by two of the most well-known rose growers in the United Kingdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

The growing number of working-age adults not in jobs places a huge financial burden on Britain, according to recent reports

‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

Dr Nik Kotecha

ECONOMIC inactivity is a major obstacle to the UK’s productivity and competitiveness.

As a business owner and employer with over 30 years of experience, I have seen firsthand how this challenge has intensified as the economically inactive population approaches 10 million nationally - almost one million more than pre-pandemic.

Keep ReadingShow less
Understanding the Hindu Psyche: Averse to Confrontation?

Artistic depiction of Arjuna and Krishna with the chariot

Is Hindu psyche averse to confrontation?

Nitin Mehta

Over 5,000 years ago, on the battlefield of Kurukshetra, two armies comprising tens of thousands of men were ready to begin a war. The Pandavs were led by Arjuna, a warrior whose archery skills were unbeatable. At the last minute, before the war was to commence, Arjuna put down his weapons and declared to Krishna his decision not to fight. He reasoned that the war would kill tens of thousands of people all for a kingdom. It took the whole of the Bhagavad Gita to convince Arjuna to fight.

Even after Krishna destroyed all his doubts, Arjuna asked to see Krishna in his form as a supreme God. In short, Arjuna wanted to avoid confrontation at any cost.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

The mainstream print media in India, both in English and regional languages, has remained largely responsible and sober

How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

MISINFORMATION and disinformation are not new in the age of social media, but India’s mainstream news channels peddling them during a time of war was a new low.

Hours after India launched Operation Sindoor, most channels went into overdrive with ‘breaking news’ meant to shock, or worse, excite.

Keep ReadingShow less
war and peace

A vivid depiction of the Kurukshetra battlefield, where Arjuna and Krishna stand amidst the chaos, embodying the eternal conflict between duty and morality

Artvee

War and Peace are two sides of the same coin

Nitin Mehta

War and peace have exercised the minds of human beings for as far back as history goes. It is no wonder then that the Mahabharata war, which took place over 5,000 years ago, became a moment of intense discussion between Lord Krishna and Arjuna.

Hundreds of thousands of people on either side were ready to begin battle on the site of Kurukshetra. Seeing the armies and his near and dear combatants, Arjuna lost the will to fight. How could he fight his grandfather Bhisma and his guru Dronacharya? He asked Krishna what all the bloodshed would achieve.

Keep ReadingShow less