Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Kamal Pankhania: "It's appropriate that the Chancellor lower the personal allowance threshold"

The leading entrepreneur reacts to the autumn statement by Jeremy Hunt

Kamal Pankhania: "It's appropriate that the Chancellor lower the personal allowance threshold"

IT'S no secret that these are difficult economic times for people around the country, and indeed across the world.

Many of us are feeling the pinch as the war in Ukraine and its impacts on energy markets drive up inflation and the cost of living. The government’s response of supporting peoples’ energy bills is the correct one. However, such measures come at a price to the exchequer.


Faced with rising interest rates pushing up the cost of government borrowing and a ‘black hole’ in public spending, Jeremy Hunt had the difficult task of trying to square the circle and close the fiscal hole. Last week (17), the Chancellor announced a set of tax rises and real-terms spending cuts that will impact all of us.

Although freezing the personal allowance threshold will be difficult for many on lower incomes, it is appropriate that Hunt lower the threshold at which people start paying the top rate of income tax from £150k to £125k. As the Chancellor said in the chamber, he is “asking more from those who have more”, helping to ensure that those with the broadest shoulders carry the greatest load, whilst everybody in society contributes to supporting the UK’s recovery through this difficult economic time.

It is important that the Chancellor and the Prime Minister showed that the poorest will be supported by this budget. Increasing pensions and benefits in line with our extremely high levels of inflation, and raising the benefits cap, will be a vital relief to many of the poorest families who have been struggling.

Kamal No.10 Picture Copy 1 Kamal Pankhania

Further investment in schools and hospitals was also welcome news. As a country, it is our duty to make sure that we can look after our sick and educate our children. The Chancellor’s plans to invest in the UK and to pledge £600bn in capital spending are also welcome. It is crucial for Britain’s future prosperity that our infrastructure and built environment are leading the world in their sophistication and development.

I was particularly pleased to hear the Chancellor’s pledge to spend billions on retrofitting buildings to make them more energy efficient. Lowering the carbon footprint of the built environment is crucial to supporting the UK’s energy independence, and in dramatically cutting families’ heating bills.

The Chancellor could have gone much further on housing, however. People need homes, and we are currently in the midst of a national housing shortage. Housebuilders need more incentivisation and support. Raising stamp duty after 2025 will inhibit new developments as fewer people will be able to afford to buy new homes.

The government should also invest in reforming and expanding its planning system. The Chancellor spoke of wanting to turn the UK into the next Silicon Valley. Introducing smart digital technologies and advanced AI processes could help dramatically increase the speed at which local authorities are able to resolve planning applications. Lengthy waiting periods serve to discourage housebuilding, ensuring that housing supply cannot keep up with demand and ever-growing numbers of people find it difficult to find safe, secure and affordable housing.

Planning reform to enable the private sector to stimulate the economy by the government stepping out of business’ way is a simple, low-cost way to get Britain building. The Treasury does not need to pay to reform the planning system, and such measures will help allow developers like Westcombe Group to stimulate growth through our projects.

By increasing the supply to address the housing shortage, more people will be able to move into affordable homes. This is something we’re encouraging with our housing association the Dholak Partnership, which provides affordable lettings for key workers, through which we are targeting over 500 people in the next five years. The more people that are able to move into such affordable housing, the less the government may need to spend on housing benefits. More homes are good for the people of Britain, and good for the government.

The Chancellor announced last week that the UK is in a recession, and it is clear that we are facing a difficult fiscal situation. He showed that the government understands the scale of the challenge, but that it is committed to supporting the most vulnerable as it enacts the necessary policies to help Britain recover. I wish him the best of luck.

More For You

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

King Charles III, patron of the Royal Horticultural Society, walks through the RHS and BBC Radio 2 Dog Garden during a visit to the RHS Chelsea Flower Show at Royal Hospital Chelsea on May 20, 2025 in London, England.

Getty Images

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

Rashmita Solanki

This particular year at the Royal Horticultural Society’s Chelsea Flower Show, there have been two members of the Royal Family who have had roses named after them.

‘The King’s Rose’, named after King Charles III, and ‘Catherine’s Rose’, named after Catherine, Princess of Wales. Both roses have been grown by two of the most well-known rose growers in the United Kingdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

The growing number of working-age adults not in jobs places a huge financial burden on Britain, according to recent reports

‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

Dr Nik Kotecha

ECONOMIC inactivity is a major obstacle to the UK’s productivity and competitiveness.

As a business owner and employer with over 30 years of experience, I have seen firsthand how this challenge has intensified as the economically inactive population approaches 10 million nationally - almost one million more than pre-pandemic.

Keep ReadingShow less
Understanding the Hindu Psyche: Averse to Confrontation?

Artistic depiction of Arjuna and Krishna with the chariot

Is Hindu psyche averse to confrontation?

Nitin Mehta

Over 5,000 years ago, on the battlefield of Kurukshetra, two armies comprising tens of thousands of men were ready to begin a war. The Pandavs were led by Arjuna, a warrior whose archery skills were unbeatable. At the last minute, before the war was to commence, Arjuna put down his weapons and declared to Krishna his decision not to fight. He reasoned that the war would kill tens of thousands of people all for a kingdom. It took the whole of the Bhagavad Gita to convince Arjuna to fight.

Even after Krishna destroyed all his doubts, Arjuna asked to see Krishna in his form as a supreme God. In short, Arjuna wanted to avoid confrontation at any cost.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

The mainstream print media in India, both in English and regional languages, has remained largely responsible and sober

How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

MISINFORMATION and disinformation are not new in the age of social media, but India’s mainstream news channels peddling them during a time of war was a new low.

Hours after India launched Operation Sindoor, most channels went into overdrive with ‘breaking news’ meant to shock, or worse, excite.

Keep ReadingShow less
war and peace

A vivid depiction of the Kurukshetra battlefield, where Arjuna and Krishna stand amidst the chaos, embodying the eternal conflict between duty and morality

Artvee

War and Peace are two sides of the same coin

Nitin Mehta

War and peace have exercised the minds of human beings for as far back as history goes. It is no wonder then that the Mahabharata war, which took place over 5,000 years ago, became a moment of intense discussion between Lord Krishna and Arjuna.

Hundreds of thousands of people on either side were ready to begin battle on the site of Kurukshetra. Seeing the armies and his near and dear combatants, Arjuna lost the will to fight. How could he fight his grandfather Bhisma and his guru Dronacharya? He asked Krishna what all the bloodshed would achieve.

Keep ReadingShow less