Why 'forced marriage figures are tip of the iceberg'
Concerns raised over data collection and lack of Home Office support
By SARWAR ALAM May 17, 2024
CAMPAIGNERS have questioned if the government department supporting victims of forced marriages is “fit for purpose” after official data suggested that there has been a significant drop in cases in the UK in recent years.
The Forced Marriage Unit (FMU), a joint initiative between the Home Office and the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO), released its annual figures last Thursday (9).
It stated that it dealt with 280 cases of forced marriage and 519 enquiries last year, which is 16 per cent lower than in 2022.
Yasmin Khan, founder of the Halo Project, which tackles forced marriage and honour-based violence, told Eastern Eye these figures are just the “tip of the iceberg”.
“This by no means is a true reflection of the scale of incidents that are happening in England and Wales,” said Khan, a national advisor to the Welsh government on violence against women. “At the Halo Project, we have seen not only an increase in referrals of victims who are in need of support and help having experienced forced marriage or honour-based abuse, but their cases are more complex, and their risks are higher.”
Yasmin Khan
The government’s data shows the number of people who received advice or support from the FMU has dropped significantly year-on-year since 2019 - when it was 1,355 cases.
“This just goes to show that the government figures are not really what organisations like ours are experiencing,” said Khan.
“It's okay that we've got these statistics, but by no means should it be a definitive statement on the number of women or men effected by honour-based abuse of forced marriages.”
Karma Nirvana supports victims and campaigns to end honour-based abuse in the UK. They have witnessed an increase in the reporting of forced marriages since the pandemic, and provided support to a total of 2,346 cases in 2022-2023, including 417 people who were facing forced marriage.
Natasha Rattu
The charity’s executive director, Natasha Rattu, told Eastern Eye the FMU statistics are not a “good guide” to measuring the prevalence of forced marriage in the UK, partially owing to FMU’s changes in recording practices in 2021.
She added that this means the data in 2023 is not directly comparable with that of previous years, prior to 2020.
The change in recording practices relates to general enquiries potentially being guided to other sources for help or information, which means that some actions previously treated as cases are now treated as general enquiries.
“We sent a letter to (foreign secretary) David Cameron raising our concerns over the FMU’s data reporting,” said Rattu.
“And this year, we published a report where we cited our concerns, including people not having confidence in the unit - which is reflected in the low reporting the unit received, because Karma Nirvana, alongside other sector partners that work in this space, have seen increased reporting on these issues.”
Rattu described the Home Office’s response to her letter as “very disappointing”.
“There's definitely been a reduction in the unit’s level of work over the years. We've heard from professionals - like the police and social workers - that have contacted our helpline and have reported a lack of support from the FMU in providing assistance in cases that they've worked on,” said Rattu.
“We've been very vocal about whether the FMU is fit for purpose. Karma Nirvana have a real good oversight of the unit from its inception 20 years ago to where it is today and we can see the unit is not what it was, it's not carrying out what it set out to achieve when it was founded.”
Rattu added: “It can be a really vital government department and we’re keen for it to be a leader in dealing with forced marriage and be at the heart of the issue. We just feel it really isn't at the moment.”
The FMU data showed that a significant number of cases are related to south Asian countries.
Pakistan routinely accounts for the largest number of cases of forced marriages reported to the unit.
There were 138 cases (49 per cent) linked to Pakistan, of those 65 per cent were female and 35 per cent male. In 85 per cent of these cases, the victim was in the UK and the focus was on preventing the marriage before it was due to take place or preventing the victim from being taken abroad or forced to sponsor a spousal visa.
In 15 per cent of the cases, victims were overseas when the referral was made. In such cases, support is usually delivered through a combination of consular staff in-country and FMU staff in the UK.
In 29 cases (21 per cent) linked to Pakistan victims were known to be aged 17 and under, and 26 cases (19 per cent) were known to be aged 18 to 21.
Bangladesh was linked to 29 cases and India was linked to 20 cases.
Aneeta Prem, founder and CEO of Freedom Charity, which provides support to victims of forced marriage, said education was key to rooting out forced marriages in south Asian communities.
Aneeta Prem
The FMU data showed a significant number of victims of forced marriages were under the age of 25. In 2023, 12 per cent of the cases involved victims were aged 15 and under; 13 per cent were aged 16 or 17 years old; 18 per cent were aged 18 to 21; and 16 per cent were aged 22 to 25.
“These figures are not just statistics; they represent individuals enduring significant dishonour and abuse. Our mission is to educate and empower communities to end these harmful practices,” Prem told Eastern Eye.
One survivor that Freedom helped told Eastern Eye: “I was just 16 when my parents told me we were going to Pakistan for a holiday to attend my cousin's wedding. To my horror, upon arriving in the village, I discovered I was the bride.
"I was raped on my wedding night and wasn't allowed to return to the UK until I was pregnant.”
The charity's efforts to tackle forced marriages includes distributing education materials and conducting workshops in UK schools.
More than 75,000 children have benefited from their programmes, which use Prem’s books, But It's Not Fair and Cut Flowers, as foundational texts. These books provide young readers with insights into the realities of forced marriage, equipping them with knowledge and strategies to oppose such practices.
"Education plays a crucial role in preventing forced marriages and aiming to end this crime within a generation. Arranged marriages can work well when they are consensual, but as soon as the freedom to choose is taken away, it becomes a forced marriage," said Prem. "We all play a role in protecting the most vulnerable among us."
Roshini, a Birmingham-based charity, helped 1,000 black and Asian women escape from physical, sexual and emotional harm last year. Their chief executive, Surwat Sohail, told Eastern Eye, “We've been very proactive in raising awareness among south Asian groups. However, whenever we run a campaign to raise awareness in a specific community, we start to see a higher number of cases coming through from that community.
“We used to do most of our work in Punjabi and Hindi. We felt we needed to reach out to other south Asian communities and the minute we did videos on south Asian TV, in different languages, such as Bengali, we saw a huge increase in our cases from that community.”
Surwat Sohail
Sohail added: “Let's look at not blaming or putting these issues on particular cultures, but instead look at what are we not doing to reach out to other cultures who are suffering.
“It is wrong to assume a particular community has more issues. Forced marriage can happen to anyone from any culture. By labelling particular communities, we miss many victims from other communities as there hasn't been enough work done to raise awareness of forced marriages across all cultures.”
Sohail added that while Roshini mainly supports people from south Asian communities, some of the charity’s projects now offer support to people from other backgrounds due to their being a lack of specialised support for these communities.
Rattu agreed that looking at forced marriages as an “exclusively south Asian problem” could lead to it being missed in other communities. “One example we see in the UK is related to the traveller communities where child marriage, forced marriage is a huge problem, but not as acknowledged or recognised as it is within the south Asian community,” she said.
Campaigners said the under-reporting of forced marriages by the FMU could have a negative long-term impact in supporting victims across all cultures.
“There is a bit of misleading, because what this data suggests is it's (forced marriages) not as wide scale as we are saying it is,” said Khan.
“Organisations and the general public will think it doesn’t really happen in their local areas. Well, it does; it happens in every single local authority.
“That’s why we need more services commissioned to support victims of forced marriages because sometimes victims only get that one opportunity to get the help that they need. If they've been failed at the first point of help, then they're not going to come back, sadly. If they receive a lack of response, or not the right response, they are not going to want to keep coming back for advice.”
A Home Office spokesperson told Eastern Eye: “Forced marriage is a hidden crime, and today’s figures will not reflect the full scale of the abuse. As such, we cannot say whether forced marriage as a whole is going up or down.
“That’s why the Forced Marriage Unit runs an extensive outreach programme to raise awareness of forced marriage and how best to support victims and encourages professionals to seek advice.
“In 2023, we delivered training to 3656 UK professionals, representing an increase of 138 per cent compared with 2022.
“We remain committed to providing support and advice to victims. The Home Office is providing up to £165,000 this year to part-fund the national honour-based abuse helpline, run by the charity Karma Nirvana. Southall Black Sisters also receives £25,000 per year to support victims of forced marriage who have returned from overseas.”
'Measuring extent of abuse'
THE government last year enlisted the help of academics to investigate the extent of forced marriage and female genital mutilation (FGM) in the UK and develop interventions to tackle these two crimes.
The researchers are working with key stakeholders, including government agencies, third-sector organisations, academics and community organisations, to identify where information is available and what measurement methods could be used to tap into this information. The data will feed into the development of a comprehensive measurement tool that can be used to determine the prevalence of these hidden crimes.
Dr Rowland Seymour
Lead researcher Dr Rowland Seymour, of the University of Birmingham’s School of Mathematics, has teamed-up with Dr Helen McCabe, an expert in forced marriage, and Dr Katie Severn, a mathematician, from the University of Nottingham.
“Measurement is crucial in identifying who needs to be protected from female genital mutilation and forced marriage. It’s only by understanding the scale of the problem that we can seek full accountability through our criminal justice system,” said Seymour.
McCabe said the research was key to developing “evidence-based policies” to target the issues of forced marriages and FGM.
“We currently have no clear idea about the prevalence of forced marriage or FGM in the UK,” she said.
“This makes it very difficult to generate evidence-based policy, and to understand what interventions work. This project offers an exciting opportunity to develop tools for generating this much-needed baseline data on prevalence, from which more effective policy and action can be built.”
The Madras State Medical Association UK (MSMA) commemorated its Ruby Anniversary with an elegant evening at the House of Lords, celebrating four decades of service, integration, and achievement in British healthcare.
The evening was graciously hosted by Lord Karan Bilimoria CBE DL, who welcomed attendees and reflected on the House of Lords’ unique role in British democracy. “Here, we win arguments not with slogans but with knowledge,” he remarked, praising the expertise of its members, including judges, scientists, military leaders—and medical professionals.
Sharing his personal journey from India to the UK, Lord Bilimoria paid tribute to his father’s advice: “Integrate wherever you live, but never forget your roots.” He acknowledged the contribution of Indian-origin doctors and lauded MSMA’s vital role in supporting the NHS.
Professor Senthil Nathan, President of MSMA, took the audience through the Association’s inspiring journey—from its humble beginnings as a social group of doctors from the Madras Presidency, to becoming a network of over 200 strong, shaping careers, supporting NHS recruitment, and fostering leadership.
Lord Karan Bilimoria speaks at the event
“Our founding members helped bring in some of the most capable clinicians to the UK,” he said. “From clinical practice to research and teaching, our members have thrived. This evening is to honour their legacy.”
He also highlighted the association’s influence in establishing wider medical bodies such as the Overseas Doctors Association and the British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (BAPIO).
Former MSMA President Dr S. N. Jayabalan, who arrived in the UK in 1976, echoed similar sentiments. “This association became like a family,” he said, adding that the support system it built helped many overcome early challenges. He noted with pride the rise of a new generation of doctors and urged them to embrace integration while preserving cultural roots.
The evening featured a formal dinner, spirited conversations, and a moving tribute segment honouring pioneering members for their lifelong contribution to medicine and community service. Honourees included: Dr Mallika Mohanraj, Dr Yamuna Rajagopal, Dr Alagappan Ramaswamy, Dr Muthurangu, Mrs Usha Muthurangu, Mr Krishnamoorthy Sarangapani, Mrs Stella Sarangapani, Dr Parthasarathy, and Dr Mallika Parthasarathy.
INDIA and Pakistan have stepped back from the brink of all-out war, with an apparent nudge from the US, but New Delhi’s aspirations as a global diplomatic power now face a key test after US president Donald Trump offered to mediate over Kashmir, analysts said.
India’s rapid rise as the world’s fifth-largest economy has boosted its confidence and clout on the world stage, where it has played an important role in addressing regional crises such as Sri Lanka’s economic collapse and the Myanmar earthquake.
But the conflict with Pakistan over Kashmir, touches a sensitive nerve in Indian politics.
How India threads the diplomatic needle – courting favour with Trump over issues like trade while asserting its own interests in Kashmir – will depend in large part on domestic politics and could determine the prospects for peace in the region.
“India ... is likely not keen on the broader talks (that the ceasefire) calls for. Upholding it will pose challenges,” said Michael Kugelman, a south Asia analyst based in Washington.
In a sign of just how fragile the truce remains, the two governments accused each other of serious violations last Saturday (10).
The ceasefire, Kugelman noted, was “cobbled together hastily” when tensions were at their peak.
Trump said last Sunday (11) that, following the ceasefire, “I am going to increase trade, substantially, with both of these great nations”.
India considers Kashmir an integral part of its territory and not open for negotiation, least of all through a third-party mediator.
“By agreeing to abort under US persuasion ... just three days of military operations, India is drawing attention to the Kashmir dispute, not to Pakistan’s crossborder terrorism that triggered the crisis,” said Brahma Chellaney, an Indian defence analyst.
For decades after the two countries separated in 1947, the West largely saw India and Pakistan through the same lens as the neighbours fought regularly over Kashmir. That changed in recent years, partly thanks to India’s economic rise, while Pakistan languished with an economy less than one-tenth India’s size.
But Trump’s proposal to work towards a solution to Kashmir, along with US secretary of state Marco Rubio’s declaration that India and Pakistan would start talks on broader issues at a neutral site, has irked many Indians.
Pakistan welcomed Trump’s offer, while Delhi denied any third-party role in the ceasefire, saying it was a bilateral decision.
Analysts and Indian opposition parties are questioning whether New Delhi met its strategic objectives by launching missiles into Pakistan last week.
By launching missiles deep into Pakistan, Modi showed a much higher appetite for risk than his predecessors. But the sudden ceasefire exposed him to rare criticism at home.
Swapan Dasgupta, a former MP from Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party, said the ceasefire had not gone down well in India partly because “Trump suddenly appeared out of nowhere and pronounced his verdict”.
The main opposition Congress party got in on the act, demanding an explanation from the government on the “ceasefire announcements made from Washington, DC.” “Have we opened the doors to third-party mediation?” asked Congress spokesperson Jairam Ramesh.
And while the fighting has stopped, tensions persist with several flashpoints in the fragile relationship that will test India’s resolve and may tempt it to adopt a hard-line stance. The top concern for Pakistan, diplomats and government officials there said, would be the Indus Waters Treaty, which India suspended last month, but which remains a vital source of water for many of Pakistan’s farms, households, and hydropower plants.
“Pakistan would not have agreed (to a ceasefire) without US guarantees of a broader dialogue,” said Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, a former foreign minister and currently chairman of the People’s Party of Pakistan, which supports the government.
Moeed Yusuf, former Pakistan National Security Advisor, said a broad agreement would be needed to break the cycle of brinksmanship over Kashmir.
“Because the underlying issues remain, and every six months, one year, two years, three years, something like this happens and then you are back at the brink of war in a nuclear environment,” he said.
An 18-year-old British woman who was reported missing while travelling in Thailand has been located in Georgia, where she has been arrested on suspicion of drug smuggling.
Bella May Culley, from Billingham, County Durham, was seen in handcuffs entering a court in the Georgian capital, Tbilisi, according to footage released by local media. The teenager had not made contact with her family since Saturday, when she failed to check in with her mother, Lyanne Kennedy, as arranged.
Concerned for her safety, Ms Culley’s father and aunt travelled to Bangkok over the weekend to seek information about her whereabouts. They later discovered on Tuesday that she had been detained in Georgia, more than 4,000 miles from where she was last believed to be.
Georgia’s interior ministry confirmed the arrest and said Ms Culley is facing charges that carry a possible sentence of up to 20 years or life imprisonment.
In a statement, the ministry said: “B.K, born in 2006, is charged with illegally purchasing and storing a particularly large amount of narcotics, illegally purchasing and storing the narcotic drug marijuana, and illegally importing it into Georgia. The committed crime envisions up to 20 years — or life imprisonment.”
Ms Culley is facing charges that carry a possible sentence of up to 20 years or life imprisonmentGeorgian Police
According to reports from Georgian media, the teenager was arrested at Tbilisi International Airport in possession of 34 hermetically sealed packages containing marijuana and 20 packages of hashish.
The UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) confirmed that a British national had been detained in Georgia and said it was supporting the individual’s family. Cleveland Police also confirmed Ms Culley’s detention.
Speaking to Teesside Live, Ms Kennedy said her daughter had travelled to Thailand on 3 May, after spending three weeks in the Philippines.
“She flew out to the Philippines after Easter with a friend and she was there for three weeks,” said Mrs Kennedy. “She was posting loads of pictures and then she went to Thailand on about 3 May.”
Mrs Kennedy said the last message she received from her daughter was on Saturday at 5.30pm, in which Ms Culley said she would FaceTime her later that day. “That was the last message anyone has received from what we can figure out up to now,” she added.
THE conflict between India and Pakistan over Kashmir has presented China with a rare chance to gather valuable intelligence, as it monitors Pakistan’s use of Chinese-made jets and weapons in live combat with India.
Security analysts and diplomats said China’s military modernisation has reached a point where it can deeply scrutinise Indian actions in real time from its border installations and Indian Ocean fleets as well as from space.
“From an intelligence perspective, this is a rare target of opportunity right on China’s borders involving a key potential adversary,” said Singapore-based security analyst Alexander Neill.
Two US officials claimed a Chinesemade J-10 Pakistani jet fighter shot down at least two Indian military planes – one of them a French-made Rafale fighter. India has not acknowledged the loss of any of its planes, while Pakistan’s defence and foreign ministers have confirmed the use of J-10 aircraft, but not commented on which missiles or other weapons were used.
The aerial clash is a rare opportunity for militaries around the world to study the performance of pilots, fighter jets and air-to-air missiles in active combat, and use that knowledge to prepare their own air forces for battle.
Security analysts said both India and China have taken steps to strengthen their military facilities and capabilities along the border, but it is also from above that China packs an intelligence gathering punch.
The London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) noted that China now fields 267 satellites – including 115 devoted to intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance and a further 81 that monitor military electronic and signals information. It is a network that dwarfs its regional neighbours, including India, and is second only to the US.
“Both in terms of space and missile tracking capabilities, China is much better off now in terms of being able to monitor things as they happen,” said Neill, who is an adjunct fellow at Hawaii’s Pacific Forum thinktank.
China’s defence ministry did not respond to questions about its satellite deployment or intelligence activities.
Pakistan’s military media wing and information minister did not immediately respond to a request for comment on any information sharing with China.
Pakistan previously said it has an “allweather strategic, cooperative partnership” with China.
India has not commented on the issue, but its High Commissioner in London, Vikram Doraiswami, told Sky News that China’s relationship with Pakistan was not a concern for India.
“China requires a relationship with all of its neighbours, that includes us,” he said.
Chinese military intelligence teams would be eager to garner information on any Indian use of air defences and launches of cruise and ballistic missiles – not just in terms of flight paths and accuracy, but command and control information, analysts and diplomats said.
Any deployment of India’s BrahMos supersonic cruise missile – a weapon it developed jointly with Russia – would be of particular interest, some analysts said, given they do not believe it has been used in combat.
Chinese-made J-10 fighter jets used by Pakistan
China has also beefed up its intelligence gathering at sea. It has been increasingly active in the Indian Ocean in recent years, with China deploying space tracking ships as well as oceanographic research and fishing vessels on extended deployments, open source intelligence trackers said.
Regional diplomats said while the Chinese navy has been relatively cautious about extensive warship deployments into the Indian Ocean, still lacking a broad network of bases, it actively seeks intelligence with these other vessels.
Over the past week, some trackers noted unusually large fleets of Chinese fishing vessels moving apparently in unison to within 120 nautical miles of Indian naval drills in the Arabian Sea as tensions rose with Pakistan.
Pentagon reports on China’s military modernisation and analysts note that China’s fishing fleets routinely perform a coordinated militia function that plays an important intelligence gathering role. “These vessels may double up as listening posts, tracking development rhythms and response patterns, feeding early warning, naval intel to their sponsors,” wrote open source tracker Damien Symon in an X post that highlighted the deployment of 224 Chinese vessels near Indian naval exercises on May 1.
Chinese officials do not usually acknowledge the existence of fishing militia or intelligence work carried out by other nominally civilian vessels.
Given its close ties with Pakistan, Beijing is likely to exploit its network of envoys and military teams to gather intelligence.
“The presence of Chinese military advisers and other personnel in Pakistan is well-known given how Pakistan’s Ministry of Defence has been importing some of its most advanced military hardware from China, so we can be certain the PLA would be able to access relevant data,” said James Char, a Chinese security scholar at Singapore’s S Rajaratnam School of International Studies.
Keep ReadingShow less
FILE PHOTO: Indian Army soldiers stand next to a M777 Ultra Lightweight Howitzer positioned at Penga Teng Tso ahead of Tawang, near the Line of Actual Control (LAC), neighbouring China, in Arunachal Pradesh. (Photo by MONEY SHARMA/AFP via Getty Images)
INDIA on Wednesday (14) dismissed China’s renaming of at least 27 places in Arunachal Pradesh as a “vain and preposterous” exercise, and underlined that the northeastern state is an “integral and inalienable” part of India. Beijing, however, said it is within its “sovereign” right to rename parts of the Indian state.
“We have noticed that China has persisted with its vain and preposterous attempts to name places in the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh. Consistent with our principled position, we reject such attempts categorically. Creative naming will not alter the undeniable reality that Arunachal Pradesh was, is, and will always remain an integral and inalienable part of India,” Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said in response to media queries.
In response to India’s statement, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ spokesperson Lin Jian told a press conference in Beijing that they have “standardised names of some parts of Zangnan (Arunachal Pradesh)” which is “part of China’s territory”.
China on Sunday (11) notified the ‘renaming’ of at least 27 places as it continues to make a territorial claim over India’s northeastern state. China refers to Arunachal Pradesh as Zangnan or southern Tibet.
This is the fifth time in the last eight years that Beijing has announced the rechristening of places in Arunachal Pradesh.
Its first attempt was in 2017, followed by those in 2021, 2023 and 2024. India has consistently rejected such Chinese attempts. Last year, Beijing also protested against prime minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the Indian state to inaugurate the Sela tunnel, which provides all-weather connectivity to the strategically important town of Tawang.
Just as Modi was visiting the state, the Chinese foreign and defence ministries published a series of statements over Beijing’s claims on Arunachal Pradesh. In early March 2024, the US also opposed any Chinese attempt to unilaterally advance its territorial claim over the northeastern state.
The latest notification came a day after India and Pakistan announced a bilateral understanding to cease armed hostilities. Between May 7 and 10, their armed forces carried out kinetic action against each other. Last Wednesday (7), India launched Operation Sindoor, targeting nine terrorist complexes across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir. China referred to the operation as “regrettable”.
India’s Operation Sindoor was a response to the April 22 terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam which left 26 people dead. India’s national security advisor Ajit Doval had spoken to his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi on Operation Sindoor, with the two holding a round of phone calls on Saturday (10).
A day after Doval and Wang spoke, China’s Ministry of Civil Affairs published its latest list of renamed areas in Arunachal Pradesh. Towards the end of last year, China also announced the construction of a mega-dam on the Yarlung-Zangbo River.
The Yarlung-Zangbo River flows through Arunachal Pradesh as the Siang River before it becomes the Brahmaputra and flows into the Bay of Bengal. The Chinese dam has serious implications for the flow of water through Arunachal Pradesh.