Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

British Top Court Rejects Government Bid To Stop ECJ Hearing Brexit Reversal Case

Britain's supreme court on Tuesday (20) rejected a last-ditch bid by the British government to stop Europe's top court from considering a case which seeks to determine whether London can unilaterally reverse Brexit.

Scottish politicians who are opposed to Britain exiting the European Union want the European Court of Justice (ECJ) to clarify whether London can withdraw its notification to leave without permission from the EU's other member states.


Pro-EU supporters who want a second referendum are hoping the case will give the option that Britain could change its mind in a second referendum and remain in the bloc after all.

The ECJ is due to hear the case on November 27.

In a final attempt to prevent the referral, the British government asked the supreme court whether it would hear an appeal but on Tuesday, three of the country's top judges rejected the application.

The government had argued that whether or not Britain could reverse the decision was immaterial since ministers had no intention of doing so.

The anti-Brexit petitioners are hoping the ECJ will rule that Britain has a legal unilateral option of staying in the EU, the world's biggest trading bloc, once the final outcome of divorce negotiations are known.

Last week, May concluded a withdrawal agreement with the EU but many in her own party along with the small Northern Irish party which props up her minority government and opposition lawmakers have said they will oppose it.

She has said the country faces three options: backing her deal, leaving the EU in a disorderly "no deal" Brexit, which would be very disruptive for businesses and citizens, or no Brexit.

It is not clear when the ECJ might issue its ruling to clarify the interpretation of Article 50 of the EU treaty, under which London last year gave two years' notice of its departure.

Reuters

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Jes Staley

Jes Staley is facing renewed scrutiny over his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein

Getty Images

How did Jeffrey Epstein stay at JPMorgan for so long? Jes Staley faces fresh questions

  • US lawmakers questioned former Barclays chief Jes Staley over his long-standing ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
  • House Oversight Committee chair James Comer said Staley appeared to have defended keeping Epstein as a JPMorgan client.
  • The inquiry follows years of regulatory action, lawsuits and settlements linked to Epstein's banking relationships.

Former Barclays chief Jes Staley is facing fresh questions over his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein after US lawmakers claimed he encouraged JPMorgan Chase to retain the convicted sex offender as a client despite internal concerns.

Speaking after Staley's closed-door interview with the House Oversight Committee, committee chair James Comer said evidence appeared to show there were "red flags" within JPMorgan about Epstein, but that Staley defended the relationship and urged the bank to continue banking him, as quoted in a news report.

Keep ReadingShow less