Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Barnie Choudhury: ‘I believe we all have a right to offend, but race should be left out of it’

IT TOOK me all of one second to conclude that Danny Baker would be sacked.

That’s not because I’m a paid-up member of the politically correct brigade. Look at my record, and you’ll see that I have a habit of speaking unpalatable truths.


The experienced broadcaster tweeted a photograph of a couple with a chimpanzee in the middle, with the words “Royal baby leaves hospital”. It was racist. Full stop. Forget the intention. Forget stupidity. Forget momentary loss of common sense. It was racist. And the BBC’s head of Five Live, Jonathan Wall, had no option but to sack him.

What made Baker’s stance worse was his defence in a follow-up tweet. Anyone thinking it was racist had a “diseased mind”, he said. To his credit, once he had taken the emotion out of his dismissal, Baker admitted on Twitter that he had “f****d up badly”.

What this shows me is how, in the age of sharing our every thought on social media, we have forgotten to take a breath and think before we post. Unlike unrecorded words said in haste, cyberspace mean everything we say is there in perpetuity. You can’t take it back, no matter how young or inexperienced you were when you first said it.

Hamza Choudhury (no relation), the Leicester City player, knows that. Last week, the Football Association fined him £5,000 and ordered him to attend a course for offensive – some would say homophobic and racist – tweets he posted six years ago when he 15.

Look, I believe that we all have a right to offend. If we force people to say and do things in dark corners, like poisonous fungi they will thrive, infest and infect things around them. I was castigated by some Asian colleagues in the BBC for giving the then leader of the British National Party, Nick Griffin, airtime after he revealed that a Sikh group wanted to join him to fight against Muslims. But to this day, I believe you have to face racists and those with whom you have ideological differences head-on. You beat them with reasoned argument.

That’s what we do in a democracy.

So what I am about to say next may offend some diversity practitioners and readers. I believe the Macpherson definition of institutional racism is fundamentally flawed. He defined it as “the collective failure of an organisation to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin. ... which amounts to discrimination through unwitting prejudice, ignorance, thoughtlessness and racist stereotyping which disadvantage minority ethnic people.”

It is flawed because of one word, ‘unwitting’, which hands racists a free get-out-of-jail-card. We need to be honest and admit to ourselves that we all have prejudices, and some cause more harm than others. If you do not like someone, act differently with or disadvantage someone because they have a different skin colour or are from a different race, then you are racist, whether you want to hide behind your ‘unwitting prejudice’.

And racism is not exclusively a white problem. We Asians are just as racist as those about whom we often complain.

The unpalatable and uncomfortable truth is that despite living together for more than 50 years in the UK, there are some Asian families who have disowned, and will continue to disown, their child if they marry someone from a different race, religion or caste.

Further, some will hire bounty hunters to track down their errant offspring and force them into marriage. And in extreme cases, some will kill their son or daughter, brother or sister, or intended bride or groom in the name of honour.

Let’s get real. We are masters at pointing the finger at others while turning a blind eye to our faults. Despite all the progress that has been made, the UK is still divided along racial lines. We have far to go to break down racial taboos, thoughts and traditions. There are UK communities which have never seen a brown face or tasted an authentic home-made curry or an English roast.

So, what now for Baker who tweeted he had one of the worst days of his life? A national newspaper or independent radio station is sure to snap him up. Who says unwitting stupidity doesn’t pay?

More For You

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

King Charles III, patron of the Royal Horticultural Society, walks through the RHS and BBC Radio 2 Dog Garden during a visit to the RHS Chelsea Flower Show at Royal Hospital Chelsea on May 20, 2025 in London, England.

Getty Images

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

Rashmita Solanki

This particular year at the Royal Horticultural Society’s Chelsea Flower Show, there have been two members of the Royal Family who have had roses named after them.

‘The King’s Rose’, named after King Charles III, and ‘Catherine’s Rose’, named after Catherine, Princess of Wales. Both roses have been grown by two of the most well-known rose growers in the United Kingdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

The growing number of working-age adults not in jobs places a huge financial burden on Britain, according to recent reports

‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

Dr Nik Kotecha

ECONOMIC inactivity is a major obstacle to the UK’s productivity and competitiveness.

As a business owner and employer with over 30 years of experience, I have seen firsthand how this challenge has intensified as the economically inactive population approaches 10 million nationally - almost one million more than pre-pandemic.

Keep ReadingShow less
Understanding the Hindu Psyche: Averse to Confrontation?

Artistic depiction of Arjuna and Krishna with the chariot

Is Hindu psyche averse to confrontation?

Nitin Mehta

Over 5,000 years ago, on the battlefield of Kurukshetra, two armies comprising tens of thousands of men were ready to begin a war. The Pandavs were led by Arjuna, a warrior whose archery skills were unbeatable. At the last minute, before the war was to commence, Arjuna put down his weapons and declared to Krishna his decision not to fight. He reasoned that the war would kill tens of thousands of people all for a kingdom. It took the whole of the Bhagavad Gita to convince Arjuna to fight.

Even after Krishna destroyed all his doubts, Arjuna asked to see Krishna in his form as a supreme God. In short, Arjuna wanted to avoid confrontation at any cost.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

The mainstream print media in India, both in English and regional languages, has remained largely responsible and sober

How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

MISINFORMATION and disinformation are not new in the age of social media, but India’s mainstream news channels peddling them during a time of war was a new low.

Hours after India launched Operation Sindoor, most channels went into overdrive with ‘breaking news’ meant to shock, or worse, excite.

Keep ReadingShow less
war and peace

A vivid depiction of the Kurukshetra battlefield, where Arjuna and Krishna stand amidst the chaos, embodying the eternal conflict between duty and morality

Artvee

War and Peace are two sides of the same coin

Nitin Mehta

War and peace have exercised the minds of human beings for as far back as history goes. It is no wonder then that the Mahabharata war, which took place over 5,000 years ago, became a moment of intense discussion between Lord Krishna and Arjuna.

Hundreds of thousands of people on either side were ready to begin battle on the site of Kurukshetra. Seeing the armies and his near and dear combatants, Arjuna lost the will to fight. How could he fight his grandfather Bhisma and his guru Dronacharya? He asked Krishna what all the bloodshed would achieve.

Keep ReadingShow less