Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Bangladesh court rules against solitary confinement for death row prisoners

Inmates can only be kept in isolation after all appeals have been exhausted

Bangladesh court rules against solitary confinement for death row prisoners

A BANGLADESH court ruled on Monday (13) that death row prisoners could not be held in solitary confinement until their appeals had been exhausted, in what lawyers called a major rights victory for inmates.

More than 2,500 convicts in the country have been sentenced to death, with most kept in solitary “condemned cells” for years on end. Rights activists said the practice is severely detrimental to the mental health of prisoners, who can spend up to 20 years in the cells while appealing their sentences through the country’s glacial legal system.


The high court ruled that death row prisoners could only be kept in solitary once they had worked through all their avenues for legal appeals.

“It is a landmark verdict,” Mohammad Shishir Manir, a lawyer for three prisoners who challenged the practice, said.

“It means from now on no prisoner can be kept in a condemned cell in solitary confinement just after a trial court verdict.”

Manir said around half of Bangladesh’s death row prisoners have historically been exonerated on appeal. “By the time these prisoners are released, they no longer behave like a normal human being. Many suffer from mental problems. Some have major health issues,” he said.

The court gave Bangladesh’s chronically overcrowded prisons two years to shift all death row inmates to general wards.

The number of death row prisoners has spiked in recent years as hundreds of convicted Islamist extremists have been handed capital sentences in the Muslim country.

Executions remain relatively rare given the size of Bangladesh’s death row population, with 20 people hanged since 2018, according to the country’s leading rights group Odhikar.

“For years, we have raised voice over the plight of death row convicts, whose rights were heavily compromised in the prisons,” activist Rezaur Rahman Lenin told AFP. “This is just one step in the right direction. The best thing would be to abolish the death penalty or declare a moratorium on all executions.”

More For You

homelessness

2.7 per cent of private rented properties in England are affordable for people receiving housing benefit.

Getty Images

Nearly 300,000 families face worst forms of homelessness in England, research shows

Highlights

  • 299,100 households experienced acute homelessness in 2024, up 21 per cent since 2022.
  • Rough sleeping and unsuitable temporary accommodation cases increased by 150 per cent since 2020.
  • Councils spent £732 m on unsuitable emergency accommodation in 2023/24.


Almost 300,000 families and individuals across England are now experiencing the worst forms of homelessness, including rough sleeping, unsuitable temporary accommodation and living in tents, according to new research from Crisis.

The landmark study, led by Heriot-Watt University, shows that 299,100 households in England experienced acute homelessness in 2024. This represents a 21 per cent increase since 2022, when there were 246,900 households, and a 45 per cent increase since 2012.

More than 15,000 people slept rough last year, while the number of households in unsuitable temporary accommodation rose from 19,200 in 2020 to 46,700 in 2024. An additional 18,600 households are living in unconventional accommodation such as cars, sheds and tents.

A national survey found 70 per cent of councils have seen increased numbers approaching them for homelessness assistance in the last year. Local authorities in London and Northern England reported the biggest increase.

Keep ReadingShow less