THE move to add more texts from ethnic minority writers to the GCSE English syllabus has been welcomed by authors and academics, who have also called for more measures to “decolonise” the curriculum.
Starting next month, schools will be offered more poems, plays and novels from writers including Imtiaz Dharker, Jamila Gavin and Tanika Gupta.
Britain’s biggest exam board, Edexcel, owned by Pearson, said other works to be included are from Grace Nichols and Benjamin Zephaniah, following complaints about there being too many “dead white men”.
Gupta, who has written theatre plays along with radio and TV scripts for more than 20 years, told Eastern Eye: “I am absolutely delighted that my play The Empress has been added to Edexcel’s English GCSE syllabus.
“The play is the story of Rani, a 16-year-old ayah from India who arrives in 1887 to work for an English family. It is a chance for pupils to engage in the real history of British Asians, servants, teachers and politicians living and working in the UK for over 150 years.
“More plays and literature need to be included on the GCSE syllabuses from more diverse backgrounds. We need to decolonise our children’s education so that they can read more widely, and for non-white British artists to be included in the curriculum.”
The decision will affect around 50,000 students and follows calls from the National Education Union to have more BAME texts.
GCSE reforms in 2014 saw a move away from American novels such as Of Mice and Men towards more British literature. Pupils must now study at least one play by Shakespeare, a 19th-century novel, a selection of poetry since 1789 as well as fiction or drama from the British Isles from 1914 onwards.
Rajinder Dudrah, professor of cultural studies and creative industries at Birmingham City University, said the latest move “is long overdue”.
He told Eastern Eye: “Windrush, Jallianwala Bagh and Partition are key landmarks in world history, not just south Asian history, that we don’t know about.
“In cities like Birmingham and Manchester with large non-English backgrounds, it is strange that the curriculum does not recognise we are neighbours. We need a rank and file review of the curriculum.
“Much more needs to be done. It’s a step in the right direction but is the tip of the iceberg. In 21st century Britain, we learn about the Tudors, but we are whitewashing and overlooking parts of our history.”
Calls to “decolonise” the curriculum have been growing at universities across the country. The National Union of Students’ adopted programme Why Is My Curriculum White? was introduced in 2015, and called on institutions to include more texts from non-white writers and academics.
Jonathan Peel is an English teacher in Harrow, north London, which has a large Indian community. He said the move by EdExcel “sounds excellent”, that GCSE language will feature writers including Zephanaiah and A Passage to Africa by BBC newsreader George Alagiah, and the “non-fiction anthology” has poems by John Agard, Sujata Bhatt and Dharker.
Peel added: “There’s room for more but this seems a good start”.
In a letter to schools in July, Katy Lewis, Pearson’s head of English, drama and languages, said: “It has been clear that there is a lack of diversity in the offer of British texts for GCSE English literature.”
Reassuring teachers, she added: “We will not be removing any of our current texts or poetry collections. You can continue teaching the texts we currently offer as we are simply adding new texts to broaden your choices”.
However, Professor Alan Smithers, head for the Centre for Education and Employment Research, warned that “careful rational thought” is needed when reviewing a curriculum.
He said: “‘Dead white men’ are an easy and fashionable target, but it is important to remember the English GCSE syllabus is there, in part, to embody the culture, values and traditions of the country.
“Literature from around the world is important in setting English literature in context, but should not replace it.”
Since April 2024, British citizens and settled residents have needed to earn at least £29,000 to apply for a partner visa. (Representational image: iStock)
THE UK’s independent Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) has said the government could lower the minimum income requirement for family visas but warned that doing so would likely increase net migration by around 1 to 3 per cent.
Since April 2024, British citizens and settled residents have needed to earn at least £29,000 to apply for a partner visa.
The MAC has proposed a new threshold of between £23,000 and £25,000, which it said would still allow families to support themselves without needing to earn above minimum wage.
It also suggested that setting the threshold between £24,000 and £28,000 could prioritise economic wellbeing over family life.
The panel opposed the previously announced plan to raise the threshold to £38,700, calling it incompatible with human rights obligations, including Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
MAC chair Prof Brian Bell said the final decision was political but urged ministers to consider the impact of financial requirements on families.
The report recommended keeping the income threshold the same across all UK regions and not raising it for families with children.
Campaigners criticised the lack of a recommendation to scrap the threshold entirely.
The Home Office said it would consider the MAC’s findings and respond in due course.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
The Canary Wharf business district including global financial institutions in London.
THE UK’s unemployment rate has increased to its highest level since July 2021, according to official data released on Tuesday, following the impact of a business tax rise and the introduction of US tariffs.
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said the unemployment rate rose to 4.6 per cent in the three months to the end of April. This was up from 4.5 per cent in the first quarter of the year.
The figures reflect the early effects of a business tax increase announced in the Labour government’s first budget in October. April also marked the beginning of a baseline 10 per cent tariff on the UK and other countries introduced by US president Donald Trump.
“There continues to be weakening in the labour market, with the number of people on payroll falling notably,” said Liz McKeown, director of economic statistics at the ONS.
“Feedback from our vacancies survey suggests some firms may be holding back from recruiting new workers or replacing people when they move on,” she added.
The data also showed a slowdown in wage growth. Analysts said the overall picture could encourage the Bank of England to continue cutting interest rates into 2026. The trend pushed the pound lower but supported gains in London’s stock market during early trade on Tuesday.
“With payrolls falling, the unemployment rate climbing and wage growth easing, today’s labour market release leaves us more confident in our view that the Bank of England will cut interest rates further than investors expect, to 3.50 per cent next year,” said Ruth Gregory, deputy chief UK economist at Capital Economics.
The Bank of England last reduced interest rates in May, cutting them by 0.25 points to 4.25 per cent.
Keep ReadingShow less
Policemen are seen on a street close to a school where 10 people died in a school shooting, including the attacker.
TEN people were killed on Tuesday after a suspected shooter opened fire in a school in Graz, southeastern Austria, according to the city’s mayor.
Mayor Elke Kahr told Austrian press agency APA that the victims included several students, at least one adult, and the suspected shooter.
"Currently, a police operation is underway... The reason for the deployment was that gunshots were heard in the building," police said on X, confirming the incident.
Police and interior ministry officials were not immediately available for comment, AFP reported.
Police sources told APA that “the situation is very unclear at the moment.”
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said she was “deeply shocked” by the reports.
“Every child should feel safe at school and be able to learn free from fear and violence,” Kallas posted on X. “My thoughts are with the victims, their families and the Austrian people in this dark moment.”
Austria, with a population of nearly 9.2 million, rarely sees public attacks. It is listed among the ten safest countries globally, according to the Global Peace Index.
Though school shootings are less common in Europe compared to the United States, several such incidents have occurred in recent years.
In January 2025, an 18-year-old fatally stabbed a student and a teacher at a school in northeastern Slovakia.
In December 2024, a 19-year-old stabbed a seven-year-old student to death and injured others at a primary school in Zagreb, Croatia.
In December 2023, a student carried out an attack at a university in Prague, killing 14 and injuring 25.
Earlier that year, a 13-year-old shot and killed eight classmates and a security guard at an elementary school in Belgrade. Six children and a teacher were also injured. The shooter later contacted the police and was arrested.
In 2009, a former pupil killed nine students, three teachers and three passers-by in a school shooting in Winnenden, southern Germany, before taking his own life.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Keir Starmer had indicated last month that he would reverse the cuts. (Photo: Getty Images)
THE GOVERNMENT will reinstate winter fuel payments to millions of pensioners this year, reversing an earlier decision that had removed the benefit for most recipients in England and Wales. The move comes after months of criticism and political pressure on prime minister Keir Starmer.
After taking office in July, Starmer's Labour government had removed the winter fuel payments for all but the poorest pensioners as part of broader spending cuts.
The government said at the time that the cuts were necessary to address a gap in the public finances created by the previous Conservative administration.
Means-testing remains for wealthier pensioners
On Monday, the government announced it would restore the payments to 9 million pensioners. Only about 2 million people earning above £35,000 will remain excluded from the £200–£300 heating subsidy during the winter months.
The initial decision had faced opposition from dozens of Labour MPs and was seen as a factor in the party’s recent electoral setbacks, including gains made by Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party in local elections. Reform UK also leads in national opinion polls.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said the decision to exclude wealthier pensioners still stands and defended the initial cuts.
“Because of those decisions, our public finances are now in a better position, which means that this year we're able to pay the winter fuel payment to more pensioners,” she said.
Treasury costings and political fallout
The Treasury said the reversal would cost £1.25 billion, while means-testing the benefit would still result in savings of about £450 million. It added that the move would not lead to permanent additional borrowing and that funding plans would be set out in a budget later this year.
Speaking at a press conference in Wales, Farage claimed credit for the U-turn.
“The Labour government are in absolute state of blind panic, they are not quite sure what to do,” he said. “Reform are leading now much of their agenda.”
Starmer had indicated last month that he would reverse the cuts.
According to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the earlier policy change had resulted in around 85 per cent of pensioner households losing access to the benefit.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
The Conservative leader said she asks people to remove face coverings—whether burqas or balaclavas—when they attend her surgeries. (Photo: Getty Images)
KEMI BADENOCH has said she will not speak to women wearing burqas or other face coverings at her constituency surgery.
In an interview with The Sunday Telegraph, the Conservative leader said she asks people to remove face coverings—whether burqas or balaclavas—when they attend her surgeries.
Badenoch also said employers should have the right to ban staff from wearing burqas, stating, “Organisations should be able to decide what their staff wear.”
She said, “If you come into my constituency surgery, you have to remove your face covering. I’m not talking to people who are not going to show me their face.” She added, “There’s a whole heap of stuff that is far more insidious... things like first-cousin marriage… My view is that people should be allowed to wear whatever they want, not what their husband is asking them to wear or what their community says that they should wear.”
Afzal Khan, Labour MP and vice-chair of the all-party parliamentary group on British Muslims, criticised the remarks. He said: “Trying to outflank Reform UK on immigration or culture wars... erodes trust in politics itself.”
The issue was raised after Reform MP Sarah Pochin questioned Keir Starmer about banning the burqa. Nigel Farage has also called for a debate.
Zia Yusuf, chair of Reform, resigned over the issue but has since returned. He told The Sunday Times he might vote for a ban but said other issues were more urgent.
Chris Philp, shadow home secretary, said he had spoken to women in burqas in the past.