Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Zuckerberg at centre of lawsuit over alleged illegal use of books and articles for AI

Publishers claim Meta chief personally approved illegal copying of millions of books and articles

Zuckerberg at centre of lawsuit over alleged illegal use of books and articles for AI

The legal filing says Meta and Zuckerberg pursued the AI “arms race” using their “move fast and break things” approach

Getty Images

Highlights

  • Five major publishers file class action lawsuit in New York.
  • Meta accused of using pirated materials to train Llama AI system.
  • Company denies wrongdoing, cites fair use defence.
Mark Zuckerberg is facing a lawsuit over claims he wrongly used millions of copyrighted books and articles to develop Meta's artificial intelligence tools.
The 41-year-old Meta chief executive is accused of personally approving and encouraging copyright infringement, according to court documents filed in New York.
Five major publishing houses, including Elsevier, Cengage, Hachette Book Group, Macmillan and McGraw Hill, have joined forces with author Scott Turow to bring the class action case.
The publishers represent works by well-known writers including James Patterson, Donna Tartt and former US president Joe Biden.

The lawsuit claims Meta illegally downloaded millions of copyrighted books and journal articles from pirate websites while training its AI language tool called Llama.

"In their effort to win the AI 'arms race' and build a functional generative AI model, Defendants Meta and Zuckerberg followed their well-known motto: 'move fast and break things'," the legal filing states.


It describes the alleged actions as "one of the most massive infringements of copyrighted materials in history".

Meta, valued at $1.5 trillion, has rejected the allegations and vowed to contest the lawsuit strongly.

The company argues that using copyrighted material for AI training can qualify as fair use.

"AI is powering transformative innovations, productivity and creativity for individuals and companies, and courts have rightly found that training AI on copyrighted material can qualify as fair use," Meta said in a statement.

The case represents the latest attempt by writers and publishers to seek compensation from tech companies over AI training practices.

Last year, AI firm Anthropic paid $1.5 billion to settle similar claims. However, not all such cases succeed.

A San Francisco court previously ruled against 13 writers, including Ta-Nehisi Coates, who brought comparable claims against Meta, though the judge noted his ruling applied only to that specific case.

More For You

Anthropic Claude chatbot competing with ChatGPT in AI market

Anthropic focuses on business customers instead of individual users, unlike OpenAI which targets consumers

Getty Images

Anthropic eyes up to $900bn valuation as Claude chatbot takes on ChatGPT

Highlights

  • Company seeks $900bn valuation, surpassing OpenAI.
  • Revenue jumped fivefold to $45bn annually.
  • Capacity shortages force user restrictions.
The artificial intelligence company Anthropic is working to raise $50bn in fresh funding that would value the business at $900bn, according to industry reports.
This would place the Claude chatbot maker ahead of competitor OpenAI in the increasingly competitive AI sector.

The company's chief financial officer, Krishna Rao, has been speaking with potential investors about the funding round, the Financial Times reported.

No final deal has been agreed, though the transaction could happen by summer. A successful raise would bring Anthropic close to joining technology giants like Apple, Microsoft and Amazon in the trillion-dollar club.

Keep ReadingShow less