Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Suitability saga

By Amit Roy

BBC TV’s adaptation of Vikram Seth’s A Suitable Boy marked a landmark.


Published in 1993, it took the BBC 27 years to bring the novel to the screen – never before has any UK broadcaster taken so much of a risk with a drama in which there were no white characters.

Granada TV’s The Jew­el in the Crown in 1984 was also set in India and proved a huge success. But based on Paul Scott’s Raj Quartet novels, that was more about the lives of the British as the cur­tain fell on the empire.

The BBC’s next big of­fering, to begin on New Year’s Day, is The Ser­pent, about the serial kill­er Charles Sobhraj.

While Mrs Rupa Mehra sought a suitable boy for her 19-year-old daughter, Lata, in Seth’s novel, the British tabloids have come round to the opinion that the erstwhile American actress Meghan Markle is not a suitable girl for the royal family.

It is ironic that objec­tions have been raised to The Crown on Netflix on the grounds that it is not historically accurate.

But accuracy has not always been an essential requirement for royal re­porting. Journalists are under pressure to pro­duce “exclusives” and not worry unduly about ac­curacy. Indeed, the com­ing and goings of the roy­al family are dealt with as though they are charac­ters in a soap opera – like EastEnders or Coronation Street – but with nicer clothes and bigger houses.

It is this seductive mix­ture of fact and fiction which helps to sell news­papers. By and by, it would be entirely appro­priate if Meghan were to play herself in a future series of The Crown.

I speak as someone who got some royal stories wrong. Though I once travelled with the royal couple, I did not believe there was anything amiss in Prince Charles’s first marriage, when it had more or less fallen apart. Perhaps it was wishful thinking on my part.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

We cannot change the past, but we can choose how to live with It

A general view of the National Windrush Monument at Waterloo Station in London, England.

Getty Images

We cannot change the past, but we can choose how to live with It

How to deal with Britain's colonial past is a topic thrust upon our leaders by Commonwealth summits, whose meetings about contemporary international cooperation owe their very existence to the history of empire and decolonisation.

The King cares about the Commonwealth, being the head of state of fifteen realms. Its many republics, such as India and Pakistan, recognise him as the head of the association, too. The monarch has a primarily symbolic role in the optics of memory and reconciliation, as with his visit to Independence Park in Georgetown, where the leaders of an uprising against slavery were executed.

Keep ReadingShow less