Kim Kardashian has lifted the lid on one of the lesser-known chapters from her whirlwind marriage to former NBA player Kris Humphries. During a candid conversation on a recent episode of The Kardashians, Kim revealed that she had to return her £1.5 million engagement ring to Kris as part of their divorce settlement despite her claim that she paid for most of it herself.
Kim and Kris tied the knot in 2011 after a highly publicised romance that culminated in an extravagant wedding special for Keeping Up with the Kardashians. However, the marriage lasted just 72 days, sparking a media frenzy and fuelling speculation about the authenticity of their relationship. Now, more than a decade later, Kim is revisiting the events that led to their split.
The 18-carat diamond ring at the centre of Kim and Kris Humphries' short-lived marriage sparks new revelationsGetty Images
While chatting with her sister Khloé Kardashian on the Hulu series, Kim opened up about the complicated financial arrangement surrounding her lavish 18-carat emerald-cut diamond engagement ring. “He only paid for about a fifth of it,” Kim explained. According to her, she had covered the majority of the cost, yet Humphries demanded the ring back during their divorce proceedings. “In order to get divorced, he said I had to give him the ring,” she said, suggesting the demand was non-negotiable.
The stunning ring, designed by celebrity jeweller Lorraine Schwartz, was later auctioned off by Humphries for approximately $749,000 (around £600,000). Kim admitted feeling disappointed to lose such an iconic piece, not just because of its value but also because it could have formed part of a jewellery collection she hoped to pass down to her children. However, Schwartz reportedly reassured Kim that returning it was probably the right move.
Kim Kardashian opens up about the emotional fallout and financial twists behind her whirlwind marriage to Kris HumphriesGetty Images
This isn’t the first time Kim has spoken about her brief marriage to Kris Humphries, but it’s rare for her to delve so deeply into her feelings about the relationship. She confessed to feeling immense pressure in the lead-up to their wedding, with cameras rolling and public expectations mounting. Admitting she had second thoughts, Kim said she feared being labelled a “runaway bride” if she called things off.
“In hindsight, I handled everything so poorly,” Kim reflected, adding that she believes she owes Kris an apology for how things ended between them.
Kim Kardashian reveals the real story behind returning her iconic Lorraine Schwartz engagement ring after her 72-day marriageGetty Images
Since their split, both Kim and Kris have moved on. Kim went on to marry rapper Kanye West, with whom she shares four children, North, Saint, Chicago, and Psalm. Their marriage ended in 2021, but Kim has kept the 15-carat diamond ring Kanye gave her and plans to pass it down to their eldest daughter, North.
When asked about the possibility of marrying again, Kim says she’s much more cautious these days but hasn’t completely ruled it out. “Never say never,” she said with a smile.
Rahul’s casual dismissal of that controversy has added fuel to the fire
Rahul Bhatt sparks controversy over 'insensitive' remarks about sisters Alia and Pooja Bhatt
Rahul Bhatt, fitness trainer and son of veteran filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt, has found himself at the centre of a social media storm following controversial remarks about his half-sister, Alia Bhatt. In a recent interview, Rahul drew comparisons between Alia and their older sister Pooja Bhatt, calling the latter more talented, attractive, and principled.
The comments, which many have labelled inappropriate and insensitive, have sparked widespread criticism online. During the interview, Rahul stated, “In my opinion, she (Alia) is not even half of what my real sister Pooja is. Not in talent, not in looks, not in terms of being sexy. In front of my sister, she is ‘paani kam chai’ (watery tea). Amongst the siblings, the most talented and the most moralistic is Pooja.”
Social media users reacted strongly, questioning why Rahul would compare his sisters in such personal terms. Several users were particularly disturbed by his reference to their appearance and sex appeal, pointing out that such comparisons within a family cross boundaries of propriety. One comment read, “This is disturbing. Why talk about your sisters like that? It’s not just weird, it’s wrong.” Another post said, “There’s nothing respectful about comparing your siblings’ attractiveness in public.”
The backlash also reignited conversation around a decades-old controversy involving Mahesh Bhatt and Pooja Bhatt. Rahul was asked about the infamous 1990s magazine cover where the father-daughter duo shared a kiss, which had stirred public outrage at the time. Dismissing the criticism, Rahul said, “It doesn’t make any difference. It’s like water off a duck’s back. We know the truth, and we’ve seen everything since childhood.”
Rahul’s casual dismissal of that controversy has added fuel to the fire, with critics saying it reflects a broader issue of the Bhatt family being insensitive to public perception and boundaries. Many users questioned the need for bringing up old incidents in a bid to defend new and equally questionable statements.
As of now, neither Alia Bhatt nor Pooja Bhatt has issued any public response to Rahul’s remarks. Both actors, known for their significant contributions to Indian cinema, have typically kept family matters private despite living in the public eye.
This episode has also sparked debate over the role of public figures in maintaining respect when discussing family matters in the media. Observers say such comments, especially when involving women’s appearance and personal qualities, reinforce problematic attitudes and fuel unnecessary controversies.
While Rahul Bhatt is not as prominent in the entertainment industry as his father or sisters, his comments have made headlines and placed the Bhatt family in the spotlight for reasons beyond their creative work. For many, this serves as a reminder that public platforms come with responsibility, and that family ties should not be trivialised or dissected for attention or comparison.
The backlash is unlikely to subside soon, especially as fans and followers of Alia and Pooja continue to express disappointment over the way the situation has unfolded. Whether or not Rahul chooses to clarify or apologise remains to be seen.