After two successful and critically acclaimed seasons, the third season of ZEE5 popular thriller series Abhay is set to release on the 8th of April, this time with a darker and bolder narrative.
Directed by Ken Ghosh and produced by Zee Studios, the Abhay franchise has created its niche in the thriller genre. While Abhay season 3 will see the return of Kunal Kemmu as the determined cop, along with Asha Negi and Nidhi Singh, this season will also see Tanuj Virwani, Divya Aggarwal, and other actors playing key roles.
For Tanuj Virwani, who calls himself a massive fan of the show’s first two seasons, starring in Abhay was like ticking all the right boxes. Previously seen in ZEE5's Original shows like Poison and Code M, the actor said, “Abhay is one of the biggest franchises, and it is gratifying to be part of such a sort-after franchise on ZEE5. Expectations will always be higher because the first two seasons were extremely successful and loved by fans.”
Talking about his character and the preparation that went into acing the role, actor Tanuj Virwani said, “My character, on the surface, is a young, sappy, city boy, but he also has another personality which is darker and nefarious. Portraying the darker side was intense, mentally, and emotionally draining as this is my first time playing a cold and ruthless role.”
Kunal Kemmu had made his digital debut with the show’s first season. Battling his inner demons, Abhay (played by Kemmu) gets involved in a case about two missing kids in the first season.
Season 2 turned much darker and had Abhay coming face-to-face with a ruthless and intelligent criminal mastermind (Ram Kapoor).
This season is unlike any other as Abhay faces a new breed of evil, a dark force capable of manipulating anyone in the name of a twisted ideological belief. Will Abhay win this battle with death? Wait to find out!
Shah Rukh Khan’s net worth reaches approximately £1.04 billion, marking his entry into the billionaire club.
Tops the Hurun India Rich List for Bollywood stars.
Wealth primarily driven by Red Chillies Entertainment and IPL franchise ownership.
Global real estate holdings and luxury lifestyle complement his business ventures.
From actor to billionaire
Bollywood superstar Shah Rukh Khan has officially joined the billionaire club for the first time, according to the Hurun India Rich List 2025. With a net worth of approximately £1.04 billion, Khan now holds the top spot among Bollywood actors, cementing his status not only as a cinematic icon but also as a successful entrepreneur.
Khan’s journey from modest beginnings in Delhi to international superstardom is well documented, but it is his business acumen that has pushed him into billionaire territory. Over the years, he has leveraged his fame into multiple ventures, spanning production, sports, and luxury lifestyle investments, making him a notable figure in both the entertainment and business worlds.
Red Chillies Entertainment: The backbone of wealth
A significant portion of Khan’s fortune stems from Red Chillies Entertainment, the production company he co-founded in 2002. The company has produced numerous critically acclaimed and commercially successful films while expanding into visual effects, animation, and digital media. Today, Red Chillies employs over 500 people and is considered one of India’s leading production houses.
“The company was always about creating quality cinema while embracing technology,” industry insiders say. “Khan’s vision and persistence have made it a business as well as a creative hub.”
Sports ventures and global assets
Khan’s wealth is also supplemented by his ownership of the Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR) in the Indian Premier League, which has become one of the league’s most successful and valuable franchises. The team’s success has provided both financial gains and a strong cultural presence.
In addition to cinema and sports, Khan owns luxury properties around the world. His Mumbai residence, Mannat, is valued at approximately £16.7 million. He also owns homes in London, Beverly Hills, Dubai, and a farmhouse in Alibaug. His luxury car collection includes a Bugatti Veyron (£1 million), Rolls-Royce Phantom (£790,000), and Bentley Continental GT (£273,000). These assets reflect his global lifestyle while complementing his business portfolio.
Bollywood’s wealth landscape
The Hurun India Rich List 2025 shows a growing trend of actors transforming their fame into substantial financial empires. Following Khan are Juhi Chawla and family (£649 million), primarily from Knight Riders Sports; Hrithik Roshan (£180 million), through his fitness brand HRX; Karan Johar (£156 million) of Dharma Productions; and Amitabh Bachchan and family (£136 million) from various investments.
A personal perspective
Despite his immense wealth, Khan remains grounded. Close collaborators note that his happiness is derived from family and the joy of creating stories that connect with people, rather than from material possessions. His rise to billionaire status underscores how creativity, perseverance, and business acumen can intersect, inspiring both aspiring actors and entrepreneurs alike.
Shah Rukh Khan’s inclusion in the billionaire club marks a landmark in his illustrious career, illustrating the evolution of a film star into a global business icon, while highlighting the potential for success beyond the silver screen.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Formulaic Hindi films lose ground as Telugu cinema delivers spectacle and authenticity that resonate with UK desi audiences
Telugu blockbusters like RRR and Pushpa are drawing UK crowds.
Bollywood flops have pushed audiences to look elsewhere.
British Asians connect with stronger, rooted Telugu heroes.
Pawan Kalyan’s They Call Him OG smashed overseas records.
More UK cinemas now screen Telugu films to meet demand.
The queue for a new Bollywood film was quiet. But around the corner, snaking down the street in a British city, a different queue was buzzing. It was not for a Hollywood blockbuster. The chatter was not in Hindi. It was in Telugu, English, and regional British Asian dialects, all waiting for a Pawan Kalyan film. This scene is becoming the new normal.
Formulaic Hindi films lose ground as Telugu cinema delivers spectacle and authenticity that resonate with UK desi audiences AI generated
When the default setting broke
For years, Bollywood was the default. It was the comforting, familiar voice of 'home' for millions in the diaspora. The formulas started to feel tired. We'd grown up watching those Bollywood stars, trusting them to deliver. But something broke, and suddenly, they couldn't get people through the door. When films like Laal Singh Chaddha and Bachchhan Paandey arrived, they just failed to connect. It felt like we were being shown a plastic-wrapped India, scrubbed clean for an international crowd we no longer recognised. That old thread that tied us to them? It snapped. And in the quiet that followed, you could hear something else roaring to life.
Formulaic Hindi films lose ground as Telugu cinema delivers spectacle and authenticity that resonate with UK desi audiences AI generated
The pan-Indian quake
The rise of Telugu cinema in the UK is not an accident. It started with movies that spoke the language of sheer scale fluently. Baahubali wasn't just a movie. It was a proper legend, the kind that felt ancient and massive. It proved, without a doubt, that a story spun in India could stand tall on any screen in the world. You could feel the rumble in your seat. Then you had RRR and Pushpa crash in. They took that energy, the spectacle, and turned it into something you could chant along to. They weren't apologising for what they were, and this was the undiluted escapism fans were starving for. This was what they called "maximum entertainment," and it was a gut punch of fun.
For British Asian audiences, many with roots in smaller towns and villages, this felt more authentic than Bollywood’s increasingly urban, Western-facing stories. It was a sensibility that translated perfectly, speaking a visual language of spectacle that needed no translation.
Telugu films, by contrast, doubled down on identifiable emotion and a kind of unapologetic heroism. Their protagonists are often loud, rooted, and purposeful; they fight, they sing, they love on camera without irony.
But the shift goes deeper than just spectacle. It is about the kind of hero you want to see on screen. For a long time, mainstream British Asian representation often came with a side of comedy. The culture was sometimes the punchline: the accented parents, the generational clashes played for laughs. It was a representation that could feel limiting.
There is also a practical reason: a bigger, better diasporic infrastructure. Telugu speakers are numerous in the UK and beyond; distributors and cinemas have responded. Once theatres start screening Telugu films regularly, community momentum builds.
If there is a risk, it is twofold: Tollywood must be careful not to trade complexity for bravado, and Bollywood must decide whether to listen. For British Asians, cinema is a resource, a way to rehearse belonging.
He is almost a phenomenon in Telugu cinema. His influence doesn't end there. He's the Deputy Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, a leader who talks about Hindu culture with a fighter's intensity. When you combine that with a fanbase whose loyalty feels less like admiration and more like a fundamental belief, you get a force that's hard to ignore. The release of They Call Him OG proved it. Tickets for the world's second-largest IMAX screen, all the way in Melbourne, vanished in two flat minutes. Across international markets, the film was running circles around Bollywood's biggest offerings.
So, you sit back and look at all that, and the question just forms itself: Why does this resonate so powerfully?
For a younger British Asian generation navigating dual identities, Kalyan represents an unapologetic cultural confidence. He is not diluted. He is not a stereotype. He is power and agency wrapped in a star’s persona. He offers an "oppositional gaze," a direct challenge to the narratives where their identity was the source of conflict, not strength, and choosing him is maybe a way of reclaiming a narrative.
Pawan Kalyan’s OG breaks overseas records with sold-out shows days before release Instagram/ogmovieofficial
The end of passive viewing?
This is not just about swapping one industry for another. It is a sign of a community maturing, of knowing what it wants to see reflected in the stories it consumes. They are no longer passive recipients of whatever cinema is handed down to them. They are active choosers. They are voting with their tickets for stories that feel epic, heroes that feel powerful, and a cultural voice that does not ask for permission to be loud, proud, and entirely itself.
Keep ReadingShow less
Gary Oldman becomes Sir Gary in a Windsor Castle ceremony
Gary Oldman becomes Sir Gary in a Windsor Castle ceremony.
He once joked about the royals never giving him a nod.
The actor's career is a wild ride from Sid Vicious to Winston Churchill.
Fans know him best today as the grubby spymaster in Slow Horses.
This honour lands six years after his Oscar win for The Darkest Hour.
So, it is finally official. Gary Oldman has officially become Sir Gary after receiving his knighthood at Windsor Castle. This feels like a long time coming, does it not? The actor, famous for completely vanishing into his roles, received the recognition for his services to drama. It is a proper cap on a career where he has played everyone from a punk rocker to a prime minister and even mentioned a few years back that the royal honour had somehow passed him by.
Gary Oldman becomes Sir Gary in a Windsor Castle ceremony Getty Images
That time he wondered about a royal nod
Back in 2023, he was talking to the BBC and the subject came up. He said, pretty bluntly, "I do not know why. You should ask them. No nod from the royals, but there we are. Maybe it is in my future." It is what makes the whole thing feel so pointed.
Well, guess what? The future turned up on Tuesday. You have to think that moment, that little public wondering, made walking into that castle today feel a bit sweeter.
Gary Oldman receiving his knighthood at Windsor CastleGetty Images
What even is a defining Gary Oldman role?
Seriously, try to pick one. Is it the raw terror of Sid Vicious? The dark grandeur of Dracula? Or is it Harry Potter's godfather, Sirius Black, for a whole generation? For awards voters, it was his transformation into Winston Churchill that finally got him the Oscar. He is one of those rare actors who is not just playing a part, he seems to become someone else entirely. That is the sheer breadth this knighthood is acknowledging.
If you want a taste of his current genius, just switch on Apple TV. He is the star of Slow Horses, playing Jackson Lamb, the most brilliantly offensive MI5 agent ever put on screen. He is almost unrecognisable, and the show is a smash. Just as he receives this lifetime achievement award, he is also giving one of the most talked-about performances on television, proving he is nowhere near done.
This is not just another award to stick on the mantle. This is the one that etches his name into the official story of British drama. From his brutal, personal film Nil By Mouth to blockbuster Batman films and now a hit spy series, his path has been wildly unpredictable. The knighthood sort of pulls all those threads together. It is the final word on a career that has been anything but ordinary.
Keep ReadingShow less
Mayhem Ball sees Lady Gaga clash with her dark self in visually explosive UK performance
Gaga's current tour makes other major pop productions look strangely safe.
The star incorporates injury and personal struggle directly into the performance.
Guest appearances feel organic to the show's world, not just celebrity drop-ins.
The production values are less about slickness and more about a raw, gothic atmosphere.
It presents a new blueprint for how pop stars can merge theatre with a stadium show.
Forget what you know about big pop tours. Lady Gaga’s Mayhem Ball, now storming UK arenas, feels less like a concert and more like a hostile takeover of the format itself. Mayhem Ball takes her new album, mixes it with two decades of hits, throws in some zombies, gondolas, and even crutches, and somehow lands as a coherent experience. It’s messy and full of drama, and that’s exactly what a great pop show should be. It’s not just about singing the songs correctly.
Mayhem Ball sees Lady Gaga clash with her dark self in visually explosive UK performance Instagram/craigizzle
Is the stagecraft actually messy?
Okay, not messy in a disorganised way. It’s messy in its ideas; it’s cluttered with symbolism. One moment she's a Tudor queen in a gown the size of a bus, and the next she's crawling out of a grave. She sings Paparazzi while using crutches. The show doesn’t always move smoothly from one part to the next. In fact, it feels rough on purpose. It isn’t a perfect, shiny video. It’s alive and a little bit dangerous. You get the sense anything could happen.
Remember when special guests just walked on, waved, and sang? Gaga integrates them. When Emma Myers and Evie Templeton from the Wednesday show appeared during The Dead Dance, they weren't just there for applause. They were woven into the gothic narrative, in wispy bridal gowns as part of the show's internal logic.
Gaga uses the stage like a playground of chaos, with gondolas, skeletons, floating eyeballs, crutches, the works. Every song has its own world. The lights, the images on the screen, the things on stage, it never stops. Poker Face became a game with dancers as chess pieces. Perfect Celebrity had her in a dirt grave. One minute you're in the midst of all that commotion, and the next it's just her playing the piano. It feels more like a film than a concert.
Gaga is effectively raising the bar on artistic risk. The standard now isn't just about how many lasers you have or how quickly you can change outfits.
What does this mean for other concerts?
She’s betting that we’re smart enough to follow a story, that we want to be challenged, not just entertained. Other stars have big shows, but Gaga is mixing chaos and emotion in a new way. It makes you feel something. The success of this Mayhem Ball tour shows a hunger for this kind of uncompromising vision, pushing other artists to ask not just "What are my hits?" but "What is my world?"
Keep ReadingShow less
J K Rowling calls Emma Watson ignorant as old and new feminism collide in a bitter public feud
Rowling dismisses Watson's recent conciliatory tone as a calculated shift.
The author argues Watson's life of fame and wealth has left her ignorant of real-world issues.
A 2022 BAFTA speech and a poorly received note are cited as a major breaking point.
Rowling contrasts her own past poverty with Watson's privileged upbringing.
She firmly states that public disagreement from former collaborators warrants a public response.
The bitter divide between J K Rowling and the stars of her Harry Potter world has just gotten much deeper. In a raw and personal online post, the author tore into Emma Watson, attacking not just her opinions but her character. Rowling branded the actress as "ignorant," claiming her life of fame has left her utterly disconnected from reality. This comes immediately after Watson made a public attempt to soften their long-running and very public disagreement on transgender rights, a move that seems to have only made the Harry Potter feud worse.
J K Rowling calls Emma Watson ignorant as old and new feminism collide in a bitter public feud Getty Images
What did Emma Watson say about J K Rowling?
It all started on a podcast, with Watson chatting to host Jay Shetty about navigating personal relationships amid public disagreement. She spoke about hoping to keep loving people she doesn't necessarily agree with, a comment widely understood to be about Rowling. She fondly referred to the author as “Jo,” talking about treasuring their shared past. It sounded like a peace offering, or maybe she’s just tired of the whole mess. “I will never believe that one negates the other,” she said, trying to hold two opposing ideas in her hands at once. It was gentle. It was careful. And Rowling clearly hated every second of it.
This is where things got really nasty. She basically called Watson a rich kid who has no idea how the real world works. “Emma has so little experience of real life she’s ignorant of how ignorant she is.” She then drew a sharp line between their lives: Watson, a multimillionaire since her teens, versus Rowling herself, scribbling away in poverty while creating the entire Potter universe.
Her point? Watson can afford to champion certain ideologies from a cushy, protected bubble. Rowling, claiming her own gritty past, says she understands what’s really at stake for vulnerable women in public spaces. It’s the classic “you’ve never had it tough” argument.
— (@)
What was the final straw for J K Rowling?
Turns out, it was something years ago. She revealed the true "turning point" wasn't just Watson's public criticism, but a moment during the 2022 BAFTA Awards. Watson was on stage, and made a little quip about being there “for ALL the witches,” which everyone read as a sly dig at Rowling. But then, according to Rowling, Watson sent her a note. The note read: "I’m so sorry for what you’re going through."
It arrived when Rowling felt most exposed. She says the threats were at their worst; graphic promises of death, rape, and torture flooding in. Her security team had to tighten everything down. The fear for her family's safety was a constant worry. In that climate of genuine terror, Watson's note felt like a slap in the face. From Rowling's perspective, it was a hollow gesture, a one-line sympathy card offered after Watson had publicly poured fuel on the very fire causing the chaos.
— (@)
The generational lens shaping this conflict
Rowling's views come from a place of real struggle. She remembers living in poverty and struggling for everything. When she speaks of women's shelters and safe spaces, she is referring to physical protection for women based on their biological sex. These are real things to her, and she feels they should be safeguarded.
Watson sees things differently. She represents a newer way of thinking. Her focus is on identity and making sure everyone feels included. Her work with the UN and her public comments show this. She believes how people identify themselves is what matters most. For younger people, this makes perfect sense. For Rowling's generation, it can seem like it ignores real-world dangers.
Emma Watson reflects on her fallout with JK Rowling Getty Images
Two different ways of speaking out
Their conflict also shows how the rules for famous people have changed.
Watson's approach is modern. She is careful with her words, choosing to let her deeds speak for her. This works well today, where social media rewards this kind of subtle support.
Rowling slams Watson’s privileged perspective in trans rights clash revealing how generations see activism differentlyGetty Images
Rowling does things the old way. She writes long posts explaining exactly what she thinks. She isn't afraid to start a debate or stand alone in her opinion. She acts like someone who expects people to read her full argument and engage with it directly.
They're not just disagreeing about issues, they're using completely different playbooks from different times. One speaks in careful hints and shared understanding, the other in direct arguments and clear lines. No wonder they can't hear each other.