'I want people to see mosques as places of love and worship'
By Sattwik BiswalAug 11, 2021
Why Ed Husain hopes his new book will help readers understand muslims better
AN AUTHOR who visited mosques across Britain for his new book has revealed his concerns for the future of Islam in this country and cautioned against the drawbacks of identity based solely on faith.
Ed Husain also said his travels showed him the risks of segregation of the Muslim community and how unfairly Islamic women are treated at mosques in Britain. The former advisor to then prime minister Tony Blair also noted how some in the Muslim community want freedom of faith without accepting the responsibility that comes with it.
In an exclusive and wide-ranging interview with Eastern Eye, Husain, 46, spoke of his hope that his book, Among the Mosques: A Journey Across Muslim Britain, “will break some bad barriers”.
He said, “In the book I tell a lot of positive stories of what I see. This country has almost 70 million people, of whom five million are Muslims; probably another five million who are of different ethnic minority backgrounds, so that’s 85 per cent who are white.
“And those people are looking at their cities, seeing these big mosques in almost every major city, they have no idea what goes on inside those mosques. So many people in the country feel uncertain, maybe a little bit scared about these mosques.
“What I've tried to do is go in and show that these are mostly places of peace, of love, of spirituality, of connecting to god, of people worshiping. It's just an open space.
“But open space needs to open up and let people in. I think people will see these are places of love and worship. I've engaged in the worship, and I've shown how that worship is done.”
However, Husain’s research also showed some challenges the community faces. He noted how some mosques are using places of worship as “political centres”.
“That's what we're seeing in Austria, France, Germany, Switzerland - an attempt to close down some mosques. We don't want to go there in this country. It's important we understand what's going on, and I think the book will help readers understand what's happening inside mosques and within Muslim communities," Husain said.
He was born in east London, his mother was from Saudi Arabia and his father was born in British India.
After school, Husain became involved in the Islamist organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir, before disowning their beliefs to start the thinktank Quilliam (which was dissolved earlier this year).
During the pandemic, places of worship, especially mosques and temples, have become hubs for the UK’s vaccination drive. Husain noted the importance of faith leaders working to raise awareness about the benefits of the jab.
“I think gurdwaras, temples, mosques, synagogues, churches are all part of the diversity in the UK and remind us of something beyond us. The fact that we can have a Hindu temple and the mosque and the Sikh gurdwara and the Jewish synagogue, and the Christian Church and the Buddhist temple all side by side in different parts of the country is a very important achievement, something that I think India has that long history of, but that other countries don't. Nazi Germany certainly did not have that.
“So it's great that we can have this and we need to preserve it. But it means they have to be tolerant and diverse, not become a political basis for separatism.”
Travelling to northern towns such as Blackburn, Bradford and Dewsbury revealed to Husain how some white people "felt that there were too many mosques in Britain, that there were too many Muslims in Britain, or there were too many Asian people in Britain".
He added, “There were two or three things that really worried me - the first is the inability of many Muslims to understand we have been here in the West for the past 60-70 years, because of one idea. And that idea is freedom, secular freedom.
Ed Husain, author of the book. (Twitter Image)
“Before the 1950s and 1960s, for the past 2,000 or 1,400 years of Islamic existence, Muslims were not in the West. Why? Because Western countries were intolerant of minorities. Then something changed after the Second World War and that allowed Muslims and others to arrive on the ‘bridge’, which is called secular freedom. That bridge is being burned by Muslims today. Because many Muslims cannot accept the fact that there will be gay teachers, there will be teachers who may not agree with Muslims or the Prophet; there will be institutions and ideas that will not be in line with what Muslims expect.
“We should accept that. But there is a Muslim impulse at play, whether it's in Batley where a teacher was expelled for showing a cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad, or whether it's a teacher in the Birmingham school who was expelled or they tried to expel him for teaching LGBT lessons to young kids.
“I'm not saying it's right, all I'm saying is there's a way to handle it. We don't organise a mob and try to expel teachers. No, that's an early sign that's worrying. That's the first thing.
"The second thing that really worries me is the way we are treating women. Many mosques I went to do not allow women inside. Some of them were major mosques and that's a real worry, because when I lived in Saudi Arabia, in Syria and I travelled regularly to Turkey to Egypt, the mosques are open to women. The mosques are open in Delhi, anyone can come and go, women are at the front of the mosque, no one bothers them.
“Now why is it that Muslims here have lost the way and want to create these mosques that are not even in Saudi Arabia?
“The third thing that deeply worries me is that in some parts of the country, Muslims are growing in numbers in segregated areas. By the year 2050, we will have 13 million Muslims in the country - which is the projection from the Office for National Statistics.
“Today we have so many problems with only five million Muslims in the country. What happens when we have 13 million?
“Does the peaceful majority get organised by a very unpeaceful minority? In some ways, those three things, also mentioned in my book, are a warning sign for us to all wake up and learn to belong as citizens of a secular country and not demand special treatment."
British Muslims line up for afternoon prayer at the East London mosque. (Photo by Abid Katib/Getty Images)
However, he also saw reason for hope. When compared to other countries, Husain said he felt Muslims living in Britain are "probably the most free", noting that in Turkey, Iraq, Afghanistan or Indonesia, “if you covert or you're gay, you will be punished, whether it's culturally or legally".
In Britain, however, he said the legal system protects everyone.
“This freedom has two sides, you have rights to do whatever you want. But you also have responsibilities. In this country, while Muslims are free to practise Islam, some don't understand their responsibility. They want all the rights, without the responsibility.
“That (aspect) isn't currently understood by the so-called community leaders. Therein lies a really big problem. It is explained by the fact that when Hamas and Israel were at war for 11 days in Gaza, Muslims from Bradford came to London in convoys, with a Palestinian flag saying, 'rape the Jews, kill the Jews'.
"How does that work? It’s a foreign conflict. Here in Britain, many young Muslim activists do not feel the common ties of citizenship with their Jewish friends. Instead, they see them as enemies because they're Jewish.
“If something happens in India, you know, on the dispute around Kashmir. Why should Muslims in Britain take the side of Pakistan? How does that work? This is a dispute between two countries over sovereign territory in a faraway land. Why are MPs in the House of Commons in Britain shouting at the British government to take the side of Pakistan?
“We don't approach conflicts and issues objectively or rationally. But we have this ‘group identity’ which comes to the fore that only Muslims, only Palestinians and only Muslims who are Kashmiri Muslims - they deserve support.
“We have poverty (here), we have homelessness. We have people in need of assistance in hospitals. That's not sustainable because people will say, you enjoy the freedoms and you enjoy the rights, but you don't take any of the responsibility seriously. That fracture might come to harvest in coming years, God forbid.”
Husain also voice his concerns around unemployment among Muslims and racism at work.
“Unemployment rates are very high among people from an ethnic background, either Pakistani or Bangladeshi. However, those of Indian ethnic have much higher success rates, why? What's going on? What’s the difference - they have the same skin tone, similar names, but there's something in the culture in India, that makes people be much more entrepreneurial and successful," Husain said.
He added: "We are now seeing people from a Bangladeshi background doing better and people from a Pakistani background being held back. Muslims from a Turkish or Kurdish background are doing really well. I don't think it's just about being Muslim, this is a danger of the identity being solely about religion. It holds you back.
“It's your private thing. Wherever you want to worship, it's up to you. But in the public domain, you've got to be British, and unless that happens, young people will not feel comfortable. All they will see is racism in the workspace. And that's my fear that young people are feeling more and more isolated.”
Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg was among a group of pro-Palestinian campaigners on board a Gaza-bound aid vessel intercepted by Israeli forces and diverted to its shores, the country’s Foreign Ministry confirmed on 9 June.
The ship, Madleen, was organised by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, a group challenging Israel’s blockade of Gaza. It had departed Sicily on 1 June, carrying a dozen activists and a symbolic amount of humanitarian supplies.
Israeli military blocks flotilla’s progress
Israel had vowed in advance to prevent the ship from reaching Gaza. Defence Minister Yoav Gallant said the military was instructed to stop the vessel “by any means necessary”. The Foreign Ministry later confirmed the Madleen had been redirected to Israel and that its passengers would be repatriated.
In a social media post, the ministry dismissed the effort as a publicity stunt by “celebrities”, referring to it as the “‘selfie yacht’ of the ‘celebrities’”. It accused Thunberg and others of staging a “media provocation”. Footage released showed passengers in life jackets being offered sandwiches and water after interception.
The Freedom Flotilla Coalition claimed it lost contact with the ship after alarms were triggered and drones were seen overhead. The group accused the Israeli military of “kidnapping” the activists. Surveillance footage appeared to show a vessel approaching and personnel boarding the Madleen.
Thunberg voices opposition to blockade
Greta Thunberg, known globally for her environmental activism, has been a strong critic of Israel’s actions in Gaza. Speaking last week, she said, “No matter what odds we are against, we have to keep trying... it’s not even near as dangerous as the silence of the entire world in the face of the live-streamed genocide.”
Israeli Defence Minister Gallant responded sharply, calling Thunberg “an antisemite” and warning that the ship would not be allowed to reach its destination. “Israel will act against any attempt to breach the blockade or aid terrorist organisations,” he said.
Small-scale aid onboard
The Madleen carried a limited quantity of humanitarian goods, including baby formula, flour, rice, medical supplies, children’s prosthetics, and diapers. The Israeli Foreign Ministry called the shipment “tiny”, adding it was “less than a single truckload of aid”.
Israel, along with Egypt, has maintained a blockade on Gaza since Hamas took control of the region in 2007. While Israeli officials say the measure is needed to prevent arms smuggling, rights groups argue it restricts essential goods and worsens the humanitarian crisis.
Repeat of earlier flotilla efforts
This is not the first attempt by activists to challenge the blockade. In 2010, a similar flotilla mission involving the Mavi Marmara ended in bloodshed when Israeli commandos boarded the ship, resulting in the deaths of nine people. A tenth person later died from injuries sustained during the raid.
Israel said its forces were attacked with clubs and knives during the operation. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition described it as “an unlawful and deadly attack”, saying the Madleen’s mission was “a continuation of that legacy”.
A separate mission earlier this year was also thwarted when a ship named Conscience, departing from Tunisia and en route to Malta, caught fire following explosions near the vessel. No injuries were reported, but the mission was called off.
Aid distribution remains contentious
In parallel with the flotilla controversy, Israel has promoted a new aid delivery mechanism via the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. The group claims to have delivered over 1.1 million meals and 11 truckloads of food on 9 June across three distribution sites.
However, the initiative has faced criticism and has been boycotted by the UN and other major organisations. They accuse Israel of using humanitarian aid as a tool of control and allege that the new system sidelines independent oversight.
The foundation suspended operations temporarily on 8 June, citing threats from Hamas. A spokesperson claimed that local workers received warnings of “serious consequences” if they continued with the aid delivery programme.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Several cars burn on North Los Angeles street during clashes between protesters and police on June 8, 2025 in Downtown Los Angeles, California, US. (Photo: Getty Images)
PROTESTERS set fire to vehicles and clashed with police in Los Angeles on Sunday after President Donald Trump sent National Guard troops to the city. Officers kept crowds away from the troops, who had been deployed as unrest entered a third day.
The protests were triggered by recent immigration raids carried out by federal officials, which have led to the arrest of dozens of people identified by authorities as undocumented migrants and gang members.
The raids began in broad daylight on Friday in a city with a large Latino population. The deployment of California’s National Guard — usually controlled by the state’s governor — was criticised by opponents who said Trump was escalating tensions. Trump has made strict immigration enforcement a central part of his second-term agenda.
"We didn’t have a problem until Trump got involved," California Governor Gavin Newsom wrote on X.
"This is a serious breach of state sovereignty — inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed. Rescind the order. Return control to California," he added.
At least three Waymo self-driving vehicles were set on fire on Sunday, and two others were vandalised as protesters moved through parts of downtown Los Angeles.
Traffic was stopped for over an hour on a major freeway while people gathered on the road. Officers from the California Highway Patrol dispersed them using flash-bangs and smoke grenades.
After a brief early confrontation outside a detention centre between Department of Homeland Security agents and a few dozen protesters, most clashes involved local police.
By early afternoon, Los Angeles Police Department officers set up containment lines away from federal buildings, keeping demonstrators from reaching armed National Guard troops from the 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, who were stationed in camouflage gear and helmets.
As night fell, groups of masked protesters remained in certain areas, with some throwing projectiles and fireworks.
The LAPD said 56 people had been arrested over two days, and three officers had sustained minor injuries.
‘Troops everywhere’
Trump defended the use of troops, suggesting more could be deployed in other parts of the country.
"You have violent people, and we are not going to let them get away with it," he told reporters. "I think you’re going to see some very strong law and order."
Asked if he would invoke the Insurrection Act, which allows the military to operate as domestic police, Trump said: "We’re looking at troops everywhere. We’re not going to let this happen to our country."
US Northern Command, part of the Department of Defense, said "approximately 500 Marines... are in a prepared-to-deploy status should they be necessary to augment and support" federal operations.
The National Guard is usually deployed for natural disasters or, occasionally, civil unrest, with the agreement of state officials.
Trump’s decision to send in the Guard without the governor’s consent is the first such move since 1965, during the civil rights era. Democrats, including former vice president Kamala Harris, criticised it. Harris called the move "a dangerous escalation meant to provoke chaos."
‘Intimidation’
Republicans supported Trump’s decision.
"I have no concern about that at all," said House Speaker Mike Johnson, accusing Newsom of "an inability or unwillingness to do what is necessary".
Protesters told AFP they believed the deployment was meant to deter dissent.
"I think it’s an intimidation tactic," said Thomas Henning. "These protests have been peaceful. There’s no one trying to do any sort of damage right now and yet you have the National Guard with loaded magazines and large guns standing around trying to intimidate Americans from exercising our First Amendment rights."
Marshall Goldberg, 78, said the presence of the troops made him feel "so offended."
"We hate what they’ve done with the undocumented workers, but this is moving it to another level of taking away the right to protest and the right to just peaceably assemble," he told AFP.
ICE raids in other US cities have led to smaller protests in recent months, but the unrest in Los Angeles is the most significant reaction to Trump’s immigration policies so far.
A CBS News poll conducted before the Los Angeles protests showed a slight majority of Americans supported the immigration crackdown.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Siddiq stepped down from her role in the UK government after being accused of benefiting from the administration led by former Bangladeshi prime minister Sheikh Hasina. (Photo: Getty Images)
FORMER UK minister Tulip Siddiq has requested a meeting with Bangladesh’s chief adviser Muhammad Yunus in London to discuss what she called a “misunderstanding” related to corruption allegations against her.
In a letter dated June 4, Siddiq asked for a chance to meet Yunus during his visit to the UK from June 10 to 13. Yunus is expected to meet King Charles and visit Downing Street to meet Keir Starmer during the trip.
Siddiq said she hoped the meeting would “help clear up the misunderstanding perpetuated by the anti-corruption committee in Dhaka that I have questions to answer about my mother's sister, the former prime minister of Bangladesh, Sheikh Hasina”.
“I am a UK citizen, born in London and representing the people of Hampstead and Highgate in parliament for the last decade. I have no property nor any business interests whatsoever in Bangladesh,” she said.
“I have sought to clarify this to the ACC, but they refuse to engage with my lawyers in London and apparently keep sending correspondence to a random address in Dhaka,” she added.
Allegations linked to land plot in Bangladesh
Siddiq stepped down from her role in the UK government after being accused of benefiting from the administration led by former Bangladeshi prime minister Sheikh Hasina. Her aunt, Hasina, was put on trial in absentia last week over crimes against humanity during her 15-year tenure as prime minister.
The Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) in Bangladesh alleged that Siddiq or her mother obtained a 7,200 sq ft plot of land through “abuse of power and influence”. Siddiq has denied the claim, and her legal team has called the accusations “politically motivated” and without basis.
Prothom Alo reported that Siddiq said she had not been contacted by authorities about the allegations.
Although she was cleared of any wrongdoing by the adviser on ministerial standards, Laurie Magnus, Siddiq resigned as economic secretary to the Treasury and city minister, saying the issue had become a “distraction” for Keir Starmer’s new government.
Arrest warrant issued in Bangladesh
Siddiq said she believed the accusations were part of a “politically motivated smear campaign” led by Hasina’s opponents.
She has yet to receive a reply from Yunus or his office, according to a source quoted by BD News. The source also said Siddiq did not understand why the ACC was pursuing her.
A warrant for Siddiq’s arrest was issued in Bangladesh last month. She said she was unaware of the warrant or of any court proceedings she was expected to attend.
Under the UK’s 2B extradition category, ministers and judges require clear evidence from Bangladesh before any arrest decision can be made.
Arrest warrants have also been issued for Siddiq’s mother, Rehana, and her siblings, who have all denied the allegations.
(With inputs from PTI)
Keep ReadingShow less
As part of this plan, £86bn will be directed towards 'turbo-charging our fastest growing sectors, from tech and life sciences, to advanced manufacturing and defence,' the government said in a statement. (Representational image: iStock)
THE UK government has announced plans to invest £86 billion in science, technology, and defence by 2030. The announcement comes days before it outlines its broader spending plan for the coming years.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has already introduced cuts to public budgets in recent months, citing tight fiscal conditions. She has also approved more borrowing for investment, enabling a total of £113bn in investment by the end of the decade.
As part of this plan, £86bn will be directed towards "turbo-charging our fastest growing sectors, from tech and life sciences, to advanced manufacturing and defence," the government said in a statement.
According to The Times newspaper, Reeves is also expected to announce a funding increase of up to £30bn for the National Health Service on Wednesday, when she presents the government's full review of public spending.
The government said the £86bn investment will focus on "people's priorities: health, security and the economy."
The plan includes the development of "innovation clusters" across the country and will give local government leaders new powers to decide how their funding is used, it said.
Reeves aims to use this spending to boost growth, which remains slow and could be affected further by the trade war launched by US president Donald Trump.
Earlier this week, the government said the review would also include a proposal to double investment in public transport in urban areas of England to more than £15 billion by 2030.
The Ministry of Defence is expected to receive a budget increase as part of Wednesday's review. However, other departments will face more spending cuts, in addition to those announced in March.
Expected areas for cuts include support for disabled people and general government operating costs.
On Saturday, thousands of people gathered in central London to protest against the anticipated spending reductions. Many carried placards that read, "tax the rich, stop the cuts -- welfare not warfare."
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Narendra Modi and David Lammy also exchanged views on regional and global issues. (Photo: X/@narendramodi)
INDIAN prime minister Narendra Modi on Saturday underlined the need for decisive international action against terrorism and those supporting it during a meeting with foreign secretary David Lammy. Lammy expressed support for India’s position and strongly condemned the Pahalgam terror attack.
According to a statement from the prime minister’s office, Modi expressed satisfaction at the successful conclusion of the India-UK Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and Double Contribution Convention. He appreciated the constructive engagement by both sides that led to this outcome.
Modi welcomed the growing momentum in bilateral ties and said he was satisfied with the deepening of the India-UK Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. He also welcomed continued collaboration under the Technology Security Initiative and noted its potential to shape trusted and secure innovation ecosystems.
Lammy conveyed the UK’s interest in further enhancing cooperation with India across key sectors, including trade and investment, defence and security, technology, innovation, and clean energy. He expressed confidence that the FTA will unlock new economic opportunities for both countries.
The two leaders also exchanged views on regional and global issues. The statement added, “The UK foreign secretary strongly condemned the Pahalgam terror attack and expressed support for India's fight against cross-border terrorism. PM Modi underscored the need for decisive international action against terrorism and those who support it.”
Thank you Prime Minister @narendramodi for your warm welcome to India. Building on the free trade agreement between our great countries, we will continue working together to deepen our partnership, celebrate our unique living bridge, and deliver growth and security. pic.twitter.com/UbPXRey4Wn — David Lammy (@DavidLammy) June 7, 2025
Separately, Lammy held talks with India's external affairs minister S Jaishankar. In his opening remarks, Jaishankar said India expects its partners to understand its “zero tolerance” policy against terrorism. “We will never countenance perpetrators of evil being put on par with its victims,” he said.
Lammy arrived in New Delhi on Saturday morning on a two-day visit aimed at reviewing various aspects of the strategic partnership between the two countries.
Speaking to Reuters after the meeting, Lammy said Britain and India discussed expanding their "counter-terrorism" collaboration following recent tensions between India and Pakistan. Lammy is the highest-profile western official to have visited both New Delhi and Islamabad since the two countries agreed to a ceasefire last month after their worst fighting in nearly 30 years.
The latest tensions began in April after the killing of 26 men in Indian Kashmir, which New Delhi blamed on terrorists backed by Pakistan. Islamabad denied the charges. India then attacked what it described as “terrorist infrastructure” in Pakistan, prompting escalation until a ceasefire was agreed on May 10.
“We want the situation to be maintained, but of course we recognise fragility, particularly in the backdrop of terrorism, terrorism designed to destabilise India,” Lammy said in an interview at the British high commissioner’s residence in New Delhi. “We are keen to continue to work with our Indian partners on counter-terrorism measures.”
He said he discussed the next steps with both Modi and Jaishankar but did not provide further details.
Last year, India and the UK discussed cooperation on combating the financing of terrorism, law enforcement and judicial collaboration, and information sharing.
Lammy also said the two countries discussed strengthening trade ties. The FTA negotiations were concluded early last month.
“I know that prime minister Keir Starmer is very much looking forward to coming to India very soon to sign the free trade agreement,” Lammy said. “There is so much that our two nations can continue to do together.”