A FORMER shadow minister has demanded that the head of the BBC “takes control” of tackling racism in the corporation.
Following an Eastern Eye exposé about the experiences of current and former BBC employees earlier this month (September 9), the Labour MP for Brent Central, Dawn Butler, wrote to the digital, culture, media and sport (DCMS) select committee raising concerns over the allegations in the report.
For the first time, Eastern Eye can share the letter in full, ahead of MPs quizzing the BBC director general, Tim Davie, over the racism claims next Tuesday (29 September).
“I'm extremely grateful to the committee,” said Butler MP. “I think the best form of interrogation of what's happening in the country, and within government, at the moment is through select committees.
“I think it’s going to be important to understand whether the director general acknowledges and accepts that systemic and structural racism exist, and then the steps that he will take to ensure that they are eliminated.”
On his second day in the job, Davie set staff a 20 per cent target for Black Asian Minority Ethnic (BAME) staff.
However, in his first public interview, Davie told the Royal Television Society’s chief executive, Theresa Wise, “I’m not giving a timing because I want you (divisional leaders) to own it. [To] the leaders in the BBC, I have been very direct, you will not be promoted in this organisation without us assessing how happy your staff are, and how you delivered against diversity targets.”
But that is not good enough for Butler.
The Labour MP and former shadow equalities minister said, “Over the years, what has been established in order to make true meaningful and sustainable progress is that leadership needs to come from the top.
“He needs to take control of the situation if he really wants to be head of an organisation that is equal and just, and what we've also found is that anything to do with equality needs to be linked with key performance indicators.”
So how might the questioning work? A select committee is given detailed briefings by its secretariat, its administrative arm. MPs read several reports and do their own research, but it is in the gift of the chair to decide what questions will be asked.
Since Eastern Eye published its two reports in recent weeks, dozens of current and former employees contacted the newspaper to complain about unjust treatment based on the colour of their skin.
We have heard accounts, seen emails and documents which suggest that the racism is not only hidden and insidious, but rife, and that staff have been diagnosed with clinical depression and suspected post-traumatic stress disorder.
Eastern Eye has been asked to brief MPs and submit evidence to the DCMS select committee, and it has done so. The evidence includes testimony from current staff and data from freedom of information requests spanning several years.
“I have been isolated, undermined and gaslit,” said one tearful south Asian employee.
Gaslighting is when someone tries to convince another person they are wrong about something when they are not.
“They make out that the BBC couldn’t possibly be racist, but it is, and then they became defensive and started to pick faults in my work. I got passed up for key assignments and they asked white colleagues who worked with me what I was like and whether I was difficult.”
Another whistle-blower revealed that at a BBC local radio station run by a south Asian manager, a journalist was sacked for using the P-word in the office.
A black journalist explained why they ended up leaving the BBC.
“I was paid less than white colleagues who did less than I did. I brought in lead, exclusive, stories from my community and was nominated for awards. They loved what I was doing, but when I asked to be paid at least the same as my white colleagues and be put on the same grade, they said no.”
In the end the journalist was poached by a national broadcaster at a much higher wage and a bump in title.
“When I said that if the BBC matched it, I’d stay, they didn’t even try. They made out that where I was going wouldn’t get the audiences the BBC have, and that they’d be able to replace me without a problem.
“The sad thing is that you see the BBC now, and the black journalists are all light-skinned Oxbridge types, and middleclass. Unlike me, they’ve never known hardship, or been on an estate where single parents go without food so their kids can eat. How can they connect with ‘their’ communities? It’s race and social class that’s the problem with the BBC.”
Eastern Eye has been contacted by current staff who say repeatedly that managers, what the BBC calls leaders, recruit in their own image. Davie acknowledged this in his speech after taking charge, telling staff that diversity was “mission critical” and not to hire “in your own image”.
One south Asian leader welcomed Davie’s words, but said, “The proof will be in the figures. You can have all the warm, fuzzy words you like, but the problem is changing the culture of recruiting white privileged mates.”
The figures are not encouraging. The BBC aggregates its leadership number across a wide range of bands (E, F and SL or senior leadership). The Corporation set itself a target of 15 per cent by 2020 and, for the past three years, its annual reports show it has missed it.
In BBC Nations and Regions, leadership is at 4.4 per cent. At the lowest band (A), BAMEs make up 18.5 per cent, while at the top (SL) it really is a case of “snowy peaks” at 7.1 per cent.
“By not saying when he wants to achieve his 20 per cent target, the DG risks repeating the same mistakes once again,” said one leadership source. “He says people won’t be promoted; (but) you know as well as I do that these white guys find ways of promoting c**p, incompetent people, their mates who look, speak and act like them.”
The select committee will now quiz the director general in what is being described by one member as “a big session”. But it is clear there is unhappiness.
One MP told Eastern Eye, “I am getting LOTS of BBC folk, including presenters, writing to me.”
Eastern Eye approached the BBC for comment on Davie’s appearance before the select committee and allegations of systemic, structural and institutional racism.
But a spokesman said, “Tim answered this at the press conference last week and we have nothing more to add.”
Butler warned that unless Davie acts, the BBC would lose viewers, and the battle for a licence fee.
“There has to be a clear commitment from the director general about how he intends to dismantle the systemic, structural and institutional racism that exists in the BBC.
“They've already lost quite a lot of viewership, over certain demographics, and people have lots of choice about what they watch and how they watch. It’s not just the BAME communities, it’s people who believe in equality, justice and fairness.”
Yusuf, who resigned as Reform chairman last week before returning two days later, said he wanted to be 'crystal clear' on the party’s stance. (Photo: Getty Images)
ZIA YUSUF has said that Reform UK would deport every illegal immigrant in Britain if the party came to power.
Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Yusuf stated, “We will deport everybody who is here in this country illegally, which is roughly about 1.2 million people.”
Yusuf, who resigned as Reform chairman last week before returning two days later, said he wanted to be “crystal clear” on the party’s stance.
Addressing recent criticisms within the party, he added, “I am Muslim. I don’t therefore think that Islam is a ‘threat to the country’,” but said “resentment” was building due to “two-tier policing.”
He said Islamist terrorism remained a major concern for intelligence agencies and pointed to issues of assimilation. Yusuf described his resignation as a result of “exhaustion” and regretted a tweet criticising new MP Sarah Pochin’s comments on a burqa ban.
Nigel Farage is expected to present Yusuf as a potential cabinet minister while also pledging to reopen some coal mines in south Wales.
Richard Tice, Reform deputy, said Yusuf had faced “horrendous online abuse” and added the party was reorganising to manage growth. Nick Candy will take over Yusuf’s former responsibilities.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
The teenager was walking along Staniforth Road in the Darnall area on Wednesday when a grey Audi reportedly hit an electric bike rider before striking Abdullah. (Photo credit: South Yorkshire Police)
TWO men have been charged with murder and three counts of attempted murder after the death of a 16-year-old boy in an alleged hit-and-run in Sheffield.
Zulkernain Ahmed, 20, and Amaan Ahmed, 26, both from Locke Drive, have been charged over the death of Abdullah Yaser Abdullah Al Yazidi, according to South Yorkshire Police.
The teenager was walking along Staniforth Road in the Darnall area on Wednesday when a grey Audi reportedly hit an electric bike rider before striking Abdullah. He later died in hospital.
An 18-year-old man on the bike was seriously injured but is not believed to be in a life-threatening condition.
The two men are due to appear at Sheffield Magistrates’ Court on Monday. A 46-year-old man and a 45-year-old woman arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender remain on bail.
Abdullah had recently arrived in the UK from Yemen and was preparing to start college. Family and friends said he was devoted to his family and had been learning English.
Darnall councillor Qais Al-Ahdal said, “We’ve really lost someone who is good in the community… May God have mercy on his soul.”
Keep ReadingShow less
Israel had vowed in advance to prevent the ship from reaching Gaza
Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg was among a group of pro-Palestinian campaigners on board a Gaza-bound aid vessel intercepted by Israeli forces and diverted to its shores, the country’s Foreign Ministry confirmed on 9 June.
The ship, Madleen, was organised by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, a group challenging Israel’s blockade of Gaza. It had departed Sicily on 1 June, carrying a dozen activists and a symbolic amount of humanitarian supplies.
Israeli military blocks flotilla’s progress
Israel had vowed in advance to prevent the ship from reaching Gaza. Defence Minister Yoav Gallant said the military was instructed to stop the vessel “by any means necessary”. The Foreign Ministry later confirmed the Madleen had been redirected to Israel and that its passengers would be repatriated.
In a social media post, the ministry dismissed the effort as a publicity stunt by “celebrities”, referring to it as the “‘selfie yacht’ of the ‘celebrities’”. It accused Thunberg and others of staging a “media provocation”. Footage released showed passengers in life jackets being offered sandwiches and water after interception.
The Freedom Flotilla Coalition claimed it lost contact with the ship after alarms were triggered and drones were seen overhead. The group accused the Israeli military of “kidnapping” the activists. Surveillance footage appeared to show a vessel approaching and personnel boarding the Madleen.
Thunberg voices opposition to blockade
Greta Thunberg, known globally for her environmental activism, has been a strong critic of Israel’s actions in Gaza. Speaking last week, she said, “No matter what odds we are against, we have to keep trying... it’s not even near as dangerous as the silence of the entire world in the face of the live-streamed genocide.”
Israeli Defence Minister Gallant responded sharply, calling Thunberg “an antisemite” and warning that the ship would not be allowed to reach its destination. “Israel will act against any attempt to breach the blockade or aid terrorist organisations,” he said.
Small-scale aid onboard
The Madleen carried a limited quantity of humanitarian goods, including baby formula, flour, rice, medical supplies, children’s prosthetics, and diapers. The Israeli Foreign Ministry called the shipment “tiny”, adding it was “less than a single truckload of aid”.
Israel, along with Egypt, has maintained a blockade on Gaza since Hamas took control of the region in 2007. While Israeli officials say the measure is needed to prevent arms smuggling, rights groups argue it restricts essential goods and worsens the humanitarian crisis.
Repeat of earlier flotilla efforts
This is not the first attempt by activists to challenge the blockade. In 2010, a similar flotilla mission involving the Mavi Marmara ended in bloodshed when Israeli commandos boarded the ship, resulting in the deaths of nine people. A tenth person later died from injuries sustained during the raid.
Israel said its forces were attacked with clubs and knives during the operation. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition described it as “an unlawful and deadly attack”, saying the Madleen’s mission was “a continuation of that legacy”.
A separate mission earlier this year was also thwarted when a ship named Conscience, departing from Tunisia and en route to Malta, caught fire following explosions near the vessel. No injuries were reported, but the mission was called off.
Aid distribution remains contentious
In parallel with the flotilla controversy, Israel has promoted a new aid delivery mechanism via the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. The group claims to have delivered over 1.1 million meals and 11 truckloads of food on 9 June across three distribution sites.
However, the initiative has faced criticism and has been boycotted by the UN and other major organisations. They accuse Israel of using humanitarian aid as a tool of control and allege that the new system sidelines independent oversight.
The foundation suspended operations temporarily on 8 June, citing threats from Hamas. A spokesperson claimed that local workers received warnings of “serious consequences” if they continued with the aid delivery programme.
Keep ReadingShow less
Several cars burn on North Los Angeles street during clashes between protesters and police on June 8, 2025 in Downtown Los Angeles, California, US. (Photo: Getty Images)
PROTESTERS set fire to vehicles and clashed with police in Los Angeles on Sunday after President Donald Trump sent National Guard troops to the city. Officers kept crowds away from the troops, who had been deployed as unrest entered a third day.
The protests were triggered by recent immigration raids carried out by federal officials, which have led to the arrest of dozens of people identified by authorities as undocumented migrants and gang members.
The raids began in broad daylight on Friday in a city with a large Latino population. The deployment of California’s National Guard — usually controlled by the state’s governor — was criticised by opponents who said Trump was escalating tensions. Trump has made strict immigration enforcement a central part of his second-term agenda.
"We didn’t have a problem until Trump got involved," California Governor Gavin Newsom wrote on X.
"This is a serious breach of state sovereignty — inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed. Rescind the order. Return control to California," he added.
At least three Waymo self-driving vehicles were set on fire on Sunday, and two others were vandalised as protesters moved through parts of downtown Los Angeles.
Traffic was stopped for over an hour on a major freeway while people gathered on the road. Officers from the California Highway Patrol dispersed them using flash-bangs and smoke grenades.
After a brief early confrontation outside a detention centre between Department of Homeland Security agents and a few dozen protesters, most clashes involved local police.
By early afternoon, Los Angeles Police Department officers set up containment lines away from federal buildings, keeping demonstrators from reaching armed National Guard troops from the 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, who were stationed in camouflage gear and helmets.
As night fell, groups of masked protesters remained in certain areas, with some throwing projectiles and fireworks.
The LAPD said 56 people had been arrested over two days, and three officers had sustained minor injuries.
‘Troops everywhere’
Trump defended the use of troops, suggesting more could be deployed in other parts of the country.
"You have violent people, and we are not going to let them get away with it," he told reporters. "I think you’re going to see some very strong law and order."
Asked if he would invoke the Insurrection Act, which allows the military to operate as domestic police, Trump said: "We’re looking at troops everywhere. We’re not going to let this happen to our country."
US Northern Command, part of the Department of Defense, said "approximately 500 Marines... are in a prepared-to-deploy status should they be necessary to augment and support" federal operations.
The National Guard is usually deployed for natural disasters or, occasionally, civil unrest, with the agreement of state officials.
Trump’s decision to send in the Guard without the governor’s consent is the first such move since 1965, during the civil rights era. Democrats, including former vice president Kamala Harris, criticised it. Harris called the move "a dangerous escalation meant to provoke chaos."
‘Intimidation’
Republicans supported Trump’s decision.
"I have no concern about that at all," said House Speaker Mike Johnson, accusing Newsom of "an inability or unwillingness to do what is necessary".
Protesters told AFP they believed the deployment was meant to deter dissent.
"I think it’s an intimidation tactic," said Thomas Henning. "These protests have been peaceful. There’s no one trying to do any sort of damage right now and yet you have the National Guard with loaded magazines and large guns standing around trying to intimidate Americans from exercising our First Amendment rights."
Marshall Goldberg, 78, said the presence of the troops made him feel "so offended."
"We hate what they’ve done with the undocumented workers, but this is moving it to another level of taking away the right to protest and the right to just peaceably assemble," he told AFP.
ICE raids in other US cities have led to smaller protests in recent months, but the unrest in Los Angeles is the most significant reaction to Trump’s immigration policies so far.
A CBS News poll conducted before the Los Angeles protests showed a slight majority of Americans supported the immigration crackdown.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Siddiq stepped down from her role in the UK government after being accused of benefiting from the administration led by former Bangladeshi prime minister Sheikh Hasina. (Photo: Getty Images)
FORMER UK minister Tulip Siddiq has requested a meeting with Bangladesh’s chief adviser Muhammad Yunus in London to discuss what she called a “misunderstanding” related to corruption allegations against her.
In a letter dated June 4, Siddiq asked for a chance to meet Yunus during his visit to the UK from June 10 to 13. Yunus is expected to meet King Charles and visit Downing Street to meet Keir Starmer during the trip.
Siddiq said she hoped the meeting would “help clear up the misunderstanding perpetuated by the anti-corruption committee in Dhaka that I have questions to answer about my mother's sister, the former prime minister of Bangladesh, Sheikh Hasina”.
“I am a UK citizen, born in London and representing the people of Hampstead and Highgate in parliament for the last decade. I have no property nor any business interests whatsoever in Bangladesh,” she said.
“I have sought to clarify this to the ACC, but they refuse to engage with my lawyers in London and apparently keep sending correspondence to a random address in Dhaka,” she added.
Allegations linked to land plot in Bangladesh
Siddiq stepped down from her role in the UK government after being accused of benefiting from the administration led by former Bangladeshi prime minister Sheikh Hasina. Her aunt, Hasina, was put on trial in absentia last week over crimes against humanity during her 15-year tenure as prime minister.
The Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) in Bangladesh alleged that Siddiq or her mother obtained a 7,200 sq ft plot of land through “abuse of power and influence”. Siddiq has denied the claim, and her legal team has called the accusations “politically motivated” and without basis.
Prothom Alo reported that Siddiq said she had not been contacted by authorities about the allegations.
Although she was cleared of any wrongdoing by the adviser on ministerial standards, Laurie Magnus, Siddiq resigned as economic secretary to the Treasury and city minister, saying the issue had become a “distraction” for Keir Starmer’s new government.
Arrest warrant issued in Bangladesh
Siddiq said she believed the accusations were part of a “politically motivated smear campaign” led by Hasina’s opponents.
She has yet to receive a reply from Yunus or his office, according to a source quoted by BD News. The source also said Siddiq did not understand why the ACC was pursuing her.
A warrant for Siddiq’s arrest was issued in Bangladesh last month. She said she was unaware of the warrant or of any court proceedings she was expected to attend.
Under the UK’s 2B extradition category, ministers and judges require clear evidence from Bangladesh before any arrest decision can be made.
Arrest warrants have also been issued for Siddiq’s mother, Rehana, and her siblings, who have all denied the allegations.