Pooja Pillai is an entertainment journalist with Asian Media Group, where she covers cinema, pop culture, internet trends, and the politics of representation. Her work spans interviews, cultural features, and social commentary across digital platforms.
She began her reporting career as a news anchor, scripting and presenting stories for a regional newsroom. With a background in journalism and media studies, she has since built a body of work exploring how entertainment intersects with social and cultural shifts, particularly through a South Indian lens.
She brings both newsroom rigour and narrative curiosity to her work, and believes the best stories don’t just inform — they reveal what we didn’t know we needed to hear.
The Oscars, Hollywood’s glitziest night, has seen its fair share of drama, but some moments were so wild they overshadowed the awards themselves. From shocking snubs to on-stage chaos, these controversies went viral, making headlines for all the wrong (or right?) reasons. Let’s take a trip down the Academy’s Hall of infamy with the top 10 most unforgettable Oscar moments, ranked chronologically!
1. Hattie McDaniel’s Segregated Seating (1940)
Hattie McDaniel made history as the first Black actor to win an Oscar for Gone with the Wind, but Hollywood’s racism was on full display when she was forced to sit at a segregated table in the back of the room. A truly ground-breaking moment tarnished by discrimination, it remains one of the most shameful instances in Oscar history.
Hattie McDaniel made history, but Hollywood’s racism kept her at the back of the roomGetty Images
2. Marlon Brando Rejects His Oscar (1973)
The Academy was left stunned when Marlon Brando refused his Best Actor Oscar for The Godfather, sending Native American activist Sacheen Littlefeather to reject it in protest of Hollywood’s treatment of Indigenous people. The backlash was immediate, Littlefeather was booed, blacklisted, and later had her identity questioned in a fresh controversy decades later.
Marlon Brando’s Oscar protest sent shockwaves through Hollywood, with Sacheen Littlefeather delivering his bold rejection speechGetty Images
3. The Godfather Score Disqualification (1972)
The Godfather is one of cinema’s most legendary films, but did you know its original score was disqualified from the Oscars? The Academy ruled that Nino Rota’s composition was ineligible because it recycled elements from his previous work.
Despite The Godfather’s cinematic brilliance, its original score was deemed ineligible for an OscarInstagram/Godfather
4. The Worst Opening Number Ever (1989)
Imagine kicking off the Oscars with a bizarre, off-key duet featuring Rob Lowe and a Disney Snow White impersonator. Cringe? Multiply that by a thousand. The number was so embarrassing that it triggered a lawsuit from Disney and is still considered the worst Oscars opening ever.
Rob Lowe and ‘Snow White’—the Oscars opening so bad, even Disney suedYoutube
5. Elia Kazan’s Honorary Oscar Protests (1999)
The Academy’s decision to give director Elia Kazan an honorary Oscar sparked outrage. Kazan had named colleagues as communists during the McCarthy era, leading many actors, including Nick Nolte and Ed Harris, to refuse to applaud his win.
A standing ovation for some, silent protest for others—Elia Kazan’s Oscar win divided HollywoodGetty Images
6. Adrien Brody’s Unplanned Kiss (2003)
Winning Best Actor for The Pianist was a career-defining moment for Adrien Brody, but his impulsive, uninvited kiss on presenter Halle Berry left audiences divided. While Berry laughed it off on stage, the moment has since been re-examined under the lens of consent and professionalism.
Adrien Brody shocked the audience—and Halle Berry—with an uninvited Oscar kissGetty Images
7. #OscarsSoWhite Movement (2015-2016)
For two consecutive years, the Academy nominated only white actors in all major acting categories, sparking the viral #OscarsSoWhite movement. The backlash was so intense that it forced the Academy to re-evaluate its membership and implement diversity initiatives.
Then vs. Now: From #OscarsSoWhite to historic wins—Hollywood’s journey toward diversity is far from overGetty Images
8. The "We Saw Your Boobs" Controversy (2013)
When Seth MacFarlane hosted the Oscars, he performed a song titled "We Saw Your Boobs," listing actresses who had appeared topless in films. The performance was widely criticised as sexist and tone-deaf for an event meant to celebrate women’s achievements in film.
Seth MacFarlane’s ‘joke’ fell flat—was this the Oscars’ most cringe-worthy moment?Getty Images
9. La La Land vs. Moonlight Envelope Fiasco (2017)
The Steve Harvey moment of the Oscars. In a shocking mix-up, La La Land was mistakenly announced as Best Picture, only for the rightful winner, Moonlight, to be revealed mid-acceptance speech. The moment was chaotic, awkward, and unforgettable! Yes, a live-TV disaster for the ages.
And the Oscar goes to…’ Oops! The La La Land–Moonlight mix-up that no one will ever forgetGetty Images
10. Will Smith’s On-Stage Slap (2022)
No one saw this coming. Mid-ceremony, Will Smith stormed the stage and slapped Chris Rock over a joke about Jada Pinkett Smith’s alopecia. The shocking altercation overshadowed the entire event, leading to a ten-year Academy ban for Smith and forever changing his career.
One slap, one stunned audience—Will Smith’s shocking Oscars moment that broke the internetGetty Images
And the Award for Most Drama Goes to…
The Oscars may celebrate cinematic excellence, but time and time again, the real show happens off-screen. Whether it’s snubs, scandals, or straight-up chaos, these viral moments prove that the Academy Awards are as much about controversy as they are about cinema. With 2025 shaping up to be another year of drama, one thing’s for sure, the Oscars will never stop surprising us!
AI can make thousands of podcast episodes every week with very few people.
Making an AI podcast episode costs almost nothing and can make money fast.
Small podcasters cannot get noticed. It is hard for them to earn.
Advertisements go to AI shows. Human shows get ignored.
Listeners do not mind AI. Some like it.
A company can now publish thousands of podcasts a week with almost no people. That fact alone should wake up anyone who makes money from talking into a mic.
The company now turns out roughly 3,000 episodes a week with a team of eight. Each episode costs about £0.75 (₹88.64) to make. With as few as 20 listens, an episode can cover its cost. That single line explains why the rest of this story is happening.
When AI takes over podcasts human creators are struggling to keep up iStock
The math that changes the game
Podcasting used to be slow and hands-on. Hosts booked guests, edited interviews, and hunted sponsors. Now, the fixed costs, including writing, voice, and editing, can be automated. Once that system is running, adding another episode barely costs anything; it is just another file pushed through the same machine.
To see how that changes the landscape, look at the scale we are talking about. By September 2025, there were already well over 4.52 million podcasts worldwide. In just three months, close to half a million new shows joined the pile. It has become a crowded marketplace worth roughly £32 billion (₹3.74 trillion), most of it fuelled by advertising money.
That combination of a huge market plus near-zero marginal costs creates a simple incentive: flood the directories with niche shows. Even tiny audiences become profitable.
What mass production looks like
These AI shows are not replacements for every human program. They are different products. Producers use generative models to write scripts, synthesise voice tracks, add music, and publish automatically. Topics are hyper-niche: pollen counts in a mid-sized city, daily stock micro-summaries, or a five-minute briefing on a single plant species. The episodes are short, frequent, and tailored to narrow advertiser categories.
That model works because advertisers can target tiny audiences. If an antihistamine maker can reach fifty people looking up pollen data in one town, that can still be worth paying for. Multiply that by thousands of micro-topics, and the revenue math stacks up.
How mass-produced AI podcasts are drowning out real human voicesiStock
Where human creators lose
Podcasting has always been fragile for independent creators. Most shows never break even. Discoverability is hard. Promotion costs money. Now, add AI fleets pushing volume, and the problem worsens.
Platforms surface content through algorithms. If those algorithms reward frequency, freshness, or sheer inventory, AI producers gain an advantage. Human shows that take weeks to produce with high-quality narrative, interviews, or even investigative pieces get buried.
Advertisers chasing cheap reach will be tempted by mass AI networks. That will push down the effective CPMs (cost per thousand listens) for many categories. Small hosts who relied on a few branded reads or listener donations will see the pool shrink.
What listeners get and what they lose
Not every listener cares if a host is synthetic. Some care only about the utility: a quick sports update, a commute briefing, or a how-to snippet. For those use cases, AI can be fine, or even better, because it is faster, cheaper, and always on.
But the thing is, a lot of podcast value comes from human quirks. The long-form interview, the offbeat joke, the voice that makes you feel known—those are hard to fake. Studies and industry voices already show 52% of consumers feel less engaged with content. The result is a split audience: one side tolerates or prefers automated, functional audio; the other side pays to keep human voices alive.
When cheap AI shows flood the market small creators lose their edgeiStock
Legal and ethical damage control
Mass AI podcasting raises immediate legal and ethical questions.
Copyright — Models trained on protected audio and text can reproduce or riff on copyrighted works.
Impersonation — Synthetic voices can mirror public figures, which risks deception.
Misinformation — Automated scripts without fact-checking can spread errors at scale.
Transparency — Few platforms force disclosure that an episode is AI-generated.
If regulators force tighter rules, the tiny profit margin on each episode could disappear. That would make the mass-production model unprofitable overnight. Alternatively, platforms could impose labelling and remove low-quality feeds. Either outcome would reshape the calculus.
How the industry can respond through practical moves
The ecosystem will not collapse overnight.
Label AI episodes clearly.
Use discovery algorithms that reward engagement, not volume.
Create paywalls, memberships, or time-listened metrics.
Use AI tools to help humans, not replace them.
Industry standards on IP and voice consent are needed to reduce legal exposure. Platforms and advertisers hold most of the cards here. They can choose to favour volume or to protect quality. Their choice will decide many creators’ fates.
Three short scenarios, then the point
Flooded and cheap — Platforms favour volume. Ads chase cheap reach. Many independent shows vanish, and audio becomes a sea of similar, useful, but forgettable feeds.
Regulated and curated — Disclosure rules and smarter discovery reward listener engagement. Human shows survive, and AI fills utility roles.
Hybrid balance — Creators use AI tools to speed up workflows while keeping control over voice and facts. New business models emerge that pay for depth.
All three are plausible. The industry will move towards the one that matches where platforms and advertisers put their money.
Can human podcasters survive the flood of robot-made showsiStock
New rules, old craft
Machines can mass-produce audio faster and cheaper than people. That does not make them better storytellers. It makes them efficient at delivering information. If you are a creator, your defence is simple: make content machines cannot copy easily. Tell stories that require curiosity, risk, restraint, and relationships. Build listeners who will pay for that difference.
If you are a platform or advertiser, your choice is also simple: do you reward noise or signal? Reward signal, and you keep what made podcasting special. Reward noise, and you get scale and a thinner, cheaper industry in return. Either way, the next few years will decide whether podcasting stays a human medium with tools or becomes a tool-driven medium with a few human highlights. The soundscape is changing. If human creators want to survive, they need to focus on the one thing machines do not buy: trust.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.