Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Singer Mohit Chauhan on Masakali 2.0: It doesn't sound like Masakali

A couple of days ago, the recreated version of the song Masakali was released. Titled Masakali 2.0, the single features Sidharth Malhotra and Tara Sutaria, and it is being trolled for ruining the original track.

Recently, while talking to a news agency, singer Mohit Chauhan said, "I heard the song. But it doesn't sound like Masakali. So they could've called it something else. But to say it's Masakali and then ride on the name of the song to make something else... If you make a new Sholay and then add anything to it, it ruins the experience of the original.”


The singer said Masakali is an iconic song and that’s why the team of the original song is affected. He said, "It got instant recognition. So it feels bad. Rahman sir is a quiet person, he doesn't say much but he's been also showing his disapproval, even Prasoon has been talking about it. And from what I came across on social media, even people aren't really liking it.”

Well, after the recreated version was release, AR Rahman had posted a note on Twitter that read, “No short cuts, properly commissioned, sleepless nights, writes and re-writes. Over 200 musicians, 365 days of creative brainstorming with the aim to produce music that can last generations. A team of a Director, a Composer and a Lyricist supported by actors, dance directors, and a relentless film crew. – Lots of love and prayers A.R. Rahman.”

Even lyricist Prasoon Joshi had posted, “All songs written for #Delhi6 including #Masakali close to heart,sad to see when original creation of @arrahman @prasoonjoshi_ &singer @_MohitChauhan insensitively utilised. Upto the conscience of @Tseries . Hopefully the fans will stand for originality. @RakeyshOmMehra.”

Well, we wonder when this recreation of songs will stop.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

From Anupama Parameswaran to Samantha Ruth Prabhu: Why the sexist ‘climber’ label follows women who date successful men

Why women are still judged by what they can gain from a relationship

Getty Images- X/anupamahere

From Anupama Parameswaran to Samantha Ruth Prabhu: Why the sexist ‘climber’ label follows women who date successful men

Highlights

  • Successful actresses are often accused of choosing relationships for money or status
  • The ‘gold digger’ and ‘climber’ labels can erase women’s own careers and financial independence
  • Anupama Parameswaran, Samantha Ruth Prabhu, Sushmita Sen and Malaika Arora have all faced versions of the same narrative
  • Their responses show how female stars are increasingly refusing to accept the assumption that a relationship must have a financial motive

When a successful woman is linked to a wealthier or more powerful man, the question is often not whether she is happy, in love or making an independent choice. Instead, the conversation quickly turns to what she might gain from the relationship.

That is where the word ‘climber’ becomes revealing. It suggests that a woman is using a relationship to move upwards socially, financially or professionally, reducing a personal choice to a calculated transaction. In Indian celebrity culture, the label often appears alongside accusations of being a ‘gold digger’, particularly when a relationship ends.

Keep ReadingShow less