Over the years, superstar Salman Khan has launched many newcomers in Bollywood, but this is going to be the first time when someone from his own family makes his acting debut under his wings. We are talking about Khan’s brother-in-law Aayush Sharma who enters showbiz with the forthcoming film LoveYatri, bankrolled under the banners of Salman Khan Films.
Khan says that he always knew that the association of his name with Aayush’s debut flick would spark nepotism debate again, but it’s the audience who decides who will stay and survive and who goes into oblivion.
In this latest interaction with Eastern Eye correspondent, Mohnish Singh, at Galaxy Apartments, Salman Khan opens up about Aayush Sharma, nepotism, and the controversy around the title of his production. Excerpts...
Salman, your brother-in-law Aayush Sharma said that this place, Galaxy Apartments, is an institution of performing arts from where his journey started. There have been some good graduates and some not-so-good ones. What do you have to say?
Who are the good ones and who are the not-so-good ones? I think everyone who has come here has done well for themselves. See, everyone has their own destiny. Who will go up and who will come down, it’s all in destiny.
When I did Maine Pyar Kiya (1989), I did pretty okay for myself. So, whoever has started from here is in a better position than what they were in when they started.
Everyone wants to be the biggest star, but some people have it in their destiny, while others don’t. Sohail and Arbaaz are working as directors and producers. They own their entertainment companies. They are doing pretty well for themselves.
Ahead of the release of LoveYatri, what is the advice that you would like to give him?
The only thing that I tell him is that don’t play any games. Just be very enthusiastic about what you want to do. Be patient. Just don’t jump into anything just because you need to work. If there is no work, that’s fine. You need to do only good work, otherwise working every day and doing bad work will get you no work later on. So, you might have to wait for good work to come. And work does come. Work nowadays comes from web, TV, movies and different kind of cinemas. People get not one, two are three changes, but they keep on getting work.
In one of his interviews, Aayush said that irrespective of whether he is going to be launched by you or somebody else, he has this baggage on his shoulder that he is related to Salman Khan, the superstar. Even if he had made his debut outside your banner, people would say Salman must have helped him bag the film. Do you think it’s not cool when a superstar’s name is attached to someone from the family who is being launched?
That’s why I am staying as far away as possible (from the film and promotions), so much so that I hope that my sister (Arpita Khan Sharma) does not think I don’t like Aayush and that I am not supporting Aayush (laughs).
When I did Hero (2015) with Sooraj (Pancholi), I did one promotional song in the film. Everywhere I go, I sing that song. It became so popular. But these things do not translate into people going and watching the movie in the theatre. The film is got to be good for it to work. In the promo and trailer of your film the urgency that people want to see the film should be there. After that, it’s word of mouth. There are many of our films which did not do well. Then people ask me to do guest appearances and stuff like that, and they think the film would do well because of that. But when they don’t work, it brings me to earth. I have danced and sung, but (at times nothing works). It’s a very close-knit industry, so we keep doing that. It’s good. It’s a good bonding. If you are free for four-five days, you go and hang out with friends. So, it’s a very chilled out atmosphere.
(Coming back to your question), I’ll tell you a story. Sohail saw Aayush a lot before in the gym. If not me, somebody else would have launched him. It was (a matter of) time. He’s been training really hard. He’s been working really hard. He’s been taking care of himself. I had worked with Abhiraj (director) on Sultan (2016); he’s a very sorted guy. So I thought this was the best for both of them.
But then the nepotism debate is still on...
I always knew the topic of nepotism would crop up. But Aayush is the son of a politician. How can one drag him into nepotism debate? He is from Himachal (Pradesh). Let me tell you, this (Bollywood) is the only place where nepotism cannot work. It cannot work at all. No matter how much you push, but it is only the audience that will make you a superstar, or reject you. No matter whose son you are, let alone being the brother-in-law of somebody. Here, brothers and sons don’t survive if they are not good. I am a writer’s son. Ajay Devgn is an action director’s son. So, it’s just the audience. It’s totally, totally audiences who come and see you in a movie, and what they like you never know. You could be the best looking guy, the best actor, but they will reject you. At the same time, you can have nothing, but it’s something endearing that they feel whether it’s the script that you have done or something about your screen presence, that they like and they go for you. That’s it.
No matter how many hits you give, one film down, the audience is not going to have that reflect, but people from the industry would. I have been seeing this change. It’s become competitive, which is very good. Earlier people used think that my film should work, his film should also work. Right now people want their films to do well, not yours, which is the worst thing for the industry. However, we are still of that old thinking where we feel happy if somebody’s film does better than ours. It motives us to work much harder to beat that. But when people don’t want to work hard, it’s hard for them to digest that somebody is doing well. So, it’s all about the hard work.
The title of the film has been changed from Loveratri to LoveYatri because some people had issues with its original title. Do you think there are always attempts to curb the freedom of expression of people in showbiz?
I think there is a lot of creativity. If they don’t like any title, we will change it. If they don’t like LoveYatri either, we can change it. Had the title of the film would matter so much, they would use only titles before theatres.
There was nothing offensive about Loveratri. We knew we were making a very sweet, beautiful love story. It’s about love and festivals, so we called it Loveratri. But some people got offended by that. Even if one person’s emotions are hurt, why are we going to do that? We are making a love story. We are not making a hate story. So we changed the title.
There’s no question who ruled the night at the 2025 BET Awards. Kendrick Lamar walked away with five trophies, including Album of the Year for GNX and Video of the Year for Not Like Us. The ceremony, held at the Peacock Theatre in Los Angeles, paid tribute to Black excellence in music, acting, and sports, and Kendrick made sure his voice and message were front and centre.
Kendrick Lamar accepts Best Album for GNX at the BET Awards in Los AngelesGetty Images
Lamar, Doechii, and a moment that mattered
The GNX rapper also won Best Male Hip-Hop Artist and shared the Video Director of the Year award with Dave Free. Accepting his award, Lamar reflected on his long-standing relationship with BET, saying, “They’ve always kept the culture at the core and put me in the middle of it.”
— (@)
Rising rapper Doechii also made headlines, not just for winning Best Female Hip-Hop Artist but for calling out former US President Donald Trump. In a fiery speech, she criticised the use of military force to break up protests in LA following ICE raids in Latino communities. “Every time we stand up for our rights, the military is sent in. What kind of leadership is that?” she asked the crowd.
A night of icons and throwbacks
The night wasn’t just about current stars. The BET Ultimate Icon Award honoured Mariah Carey, Snoop Dogg, Jamie Foxx, and gospel star Kirk Franklin for their decades of influence in music, entertainment, and community action. Stevie Wonder presented Foxx’s award as he opened up about his recovery from a 2023 stroke. “When I saw the ‘In Memoriam’ segment, I thought that could’ve been me,” he said.
Mariah Carey celebrates her Ultimate Icon Award with a rare live performanceGetty Images
Mariah Carey, presented her award by Busta Rhymes, lit up the stage with a brief but heartfelt speech. “If you're going to win one of these, it might as well be the Ultimate Icon,” she joked, hinting at the ups and downs of her legendary career.
With Lamar and SZA heading back on tour and voices like Doechii’s rising louder, the 2025 BET Awards proved it is a stage for change.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Harris Dickinson debuts as Rhode’s first male model in new Glazing Mist campaign
Rhode, Hailey Bieber’s rapidly growing skincare label, has chosen Babygirl actor Harris Dickinson as the face of its new product, the Glazing Mist. Known for his understated performances and growing fashion presence, Dickinson is the first male model to front a campaign for the brand. The new mist, priced at £24 (₹2,520), goes live on 24 June exclusively at rhodeskin.com.
A surprising choice that feels just right
The campaign, shot in stark black-and-white, features close-up visuals of Dickinson misting his face with the Glazing Mist, designed to refresh skin and deliver a natural glow. With ingredients like ectoin, ceramides, and magnolia extract, the formula offers both hydration and barrier support. It has also earned a stamp of approval from the National Eczema Association.
Hailey Bieber explained her choice simply: she watched Babygirl, loved Dickinson’s performance, and sensed he could bring the kind of quiet edge she wanted. “I didn’t want it to feel too ‘on-the-nose’ with the film,” she said. “It had to be chic and sporty.” The internet, however, couldn’t resist the connection to Dickinson’s now-infamous milk scene in the film, and fans were quick to point out how the dewy mist echoed that very vibe.
Rhode expands, without changing its DNA
Since its 2022 launch, Rhode has stood out for sleek, limited product drops and a focused digital presence. Its recent £790 million (₹82,950 crore) acquisition by e.l.f. Beauty has only amplified interest in where the brand goes next. While introducing a male face might suggest a shift, Bieber was clear: this isn’t about launching a men’s line but widening the brand’s appeal. “I want everyone to see themselves in Rhode,” she said.
Dickinson’s inclusion reflects a subtle repositioning. Best known for roles in Beach Rats, Triangle of Sadness, and now Babygirl, he has also been a regular in fashion, working with Dior and Loewe.
With this campaign, Rhode continues to evolve clearly, without losing the minimalist identity that made it stand out in the first place.
Keep ReadingShow less
HBO’s Harry Potter reboot slammed for casting Italian actress as Indian character Parvati Patil
HBO’s upcoming Harry Potter reboot is already under fire, this time for casting Italian actress Alessia Leoni as Parvati Patil, a character rooted in Indian culture. The announcement has triggered widespread backlash from fans who accuse the makers of side-lining authentic South Asian representation in favour of what many see as surface-level diversity.
Parvati, originally portrayed by Shefali Chowdhury in the films, is one of the few explicitly Indian characters in the Harry Potter universe. The decision to cast someone with no clear Indian heritage has led to heated discussions across platforms like Reddit and X, with fans calling out what they perceive as performative inclusivity.
Fans question why Indian talent was overlooked again
Many online comments have shared similar frustrations: that casting a brown-skinned actor is not the same as casting someone of Indian origin. “They just picked someone who looks brown and called it a day,” one Redditor commented. Another added, “Parvati is not just a name, it’s a direct reference to Hindu culture. It deserved more thought.”
This is not the first controversy to hit the reboot. Earlier announcements like casting Paapa Essiedu as Snape and Arabella Stanton as Hermione also drew criticism from those who felt the series was playing fast and loose with established character identities. Supporters of accurate representation argue that while the intent may be diversity, the execution often feels tokenistic.
— (@)
Adding fuel to the fire is the casting history of the original films, where British-Bangladeshi actors Shefali Chowdhury and Afshan Azad played the Patil twins after being discovered through grassroots-level auditions. That sense of grounded authenticity, fans argue, is missing in the current reboot.
HBO's broader casting choices also under scrutiny
Alongside Leoni, HBO announced several other cast members: Katherine Parkinson as Molly Weasley, Lox Pratt as Draco Malfoy, Johnny Flynn as Lucius Malfoy, Leo Earley as Seamus Finnigan, Sienna Moosah as Lavender Brown, Bel Powley and Daniel Rigby as the Dursleys, and Bertie Carvel as Cornelius Fudge.
— (@)
The series, hoped to be a faithful adaptation of J.K. Rowling’s books, is scheduled to premiere in 2026. But with these early casting calls, many longtime fans feel HBO is missing the mark on cultural nuance—and all this before a single spell has been cast on screen.
The tense deliberations in Harvey Weinstein’s New York sex crimes retrial have descended into open conflict. Jurors are reportedly attacking each other, pressuring hold-outs, and improperly considering the disgraced movie mogul’s notorious past, information explicitly banned from their discussions. This internal strife forced the jury foreperson to urgently alert the judge on Monday morning about a “situation which isn’t very good”, casting serious doubt on their ability to reach a fair verdict.
Infighting and forbidden arguments taint deliberations
According to a court transcript, the foreperson painted a grim picture for Judge Curtis Farber. Jurors are “not on the same page”, with some actively “attacking” others in a bid to change minds. Crucially, they are “pushing people” by bringing up Weinstein’s public history, details not presented as evidence during this specific trial.
As per reports, Jurors are in a heated debate during Weinstein retrial deliberationsGetty Images
This is similar to the earlier “playground stuff” reported last week, where one young juror felt unfairly “shunned” and questioned the fairness of the process, though the judge kept him on the panel. The jury itself signalled deep divisions, requesting a reread of “reasonable doubt” rules and guidance on “avoiding a hung jury”.
Mistrial denied, but jury reminded “Stick to the evidence”
Weinstein’s lawyers, citing a “tainted” and “runaway jury”, immediately seized on the turmoil to demand a mistrial. Defence attorney Arthur Aidala argued jurors were “ganging up” and considering “things that were not brought into this trial”. Prosecutors countered that some past context was legally permissible. Judge Farber denied the mistrial but took swift action. He hauled the entire jury back in, sternly instructing them that deliberations must focus only on evidence presented during the retrial concerning the three specific charges, including rape and criminal sex acts involving three women. He reiterated they must disregard anything else they knew about Weinstein.
Weinstein jury divided by heated disputes over forbidden pastGetty Images
The jury ended Monday claiming they were “making progress”, even asking for coffee to fuel further talks and requesting to revisit some testimony. However, the damage from the infighting and forbidden discussions lingers.
Weinstein, 73, already serving a long sentence for a separate California rape conviction, awaits this jury’s verdict on charges stemming from allegations by a former production assistant, an aspiring actress, and a model. This retrial, ordered after his landmark 2020 New York conviction was overturned, remains a critical, though now deeply troubled, chapter in the #MeToo saga he set to fire.
Keep ReadingShow less
Charli XCX celebrates a year of Brat’s cultural takeover
It’s been a full year since Charli XCX dropped Brat, and the album’s neon-green grip on pop culture has not loosened. Forget fading summer anthems; Brat feels permanently wired into the now. How did an artist long celebrated for being ahead of the curve finally make the whole world tune in? Well, she did it entirely her own way.
Charli was no newcomer. She smashed charts a decade ago with “Fancy” and penned hits for others. Yet mainstream stardom on her own terms felt elusive until Brat. The rollout was masterful, starting with the divisive “Von Dutch”, then the It Girl-packed “360” video featuring faces like Julia Fox and Chloë Sevigny, who soon became unavoidable.
Charli XCX arrives for the 2025 Met GalaGetty Images
Crucially, she nurtured her core fans (“Angels”) with intimate pop-up shows, birthing the iconic Brat Wall, where teasers about collaborations and the deluxe album kept excitement boiling. When Brat landed, hitting No. 3 in the US and No. 2 in the UK, it was a moment of absolute cultural takeover.
Beyond the music: building a movement
Brat’s fire spread far beyond the songs. A simple tweet : “Kamala IS brat”, saw the US Vice President’s campaign adopt the album’s aesthetic overnight, sparking global chatter. Charli directly addressed fan speculation, confirming “Girl, So Confusing” was about Lorde, then brilliantly working it out with her on a remix weeks later. She refused to let the moment die, dropping a full remix album (Brat and It’s the Same but There’s Three More Songs so It’s Not), featuring everyone from Billie Eilish to underground stars, which pushed Brat to UK No. 1.
Charli XCX performing on stage Getty Images
The Sweat and Brat tours became must-see events, packed with surprise guests. Grammy wins followed, plus SNL, Coachella and film cameos. Even her older song “Party 4 U” surged up the charts years later. Charli questioned at Coachella: “Does this mean brat summer is finally over?” The answer seems clear. Brat wasn’t just a seasonal hit. It was almost like Charli XCX meticulously crafting a phenomenon, proving that staying fiercely true to her vision was the ultimate key to connect with a wide audience.