Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Nepotism tornado sweeps Bollywood

FANS SLAM STAR KIDS AFTER SUSHANT SINGH RAJPUT’S SUICIDE

by ASJAD NAZIR


THE nepotism debate in Bollywood has lightly rumbled on for a number of years now, but the devastating suicide of Sushant Singh Rajput has turned it into a hurricane like thunderstorm that has swept up star kids, A-list celebrities and big studios.

Millions have been so outraged with the actor’s death at the age of 34 and stories emerging about bullying in Bollywood that they have collectively raised their voices in anger. Numerous calls for justice have resulted in a police investigation into the death to see if anyone in Hindi cinema may have triggered it and one lawyer deciding to launch a high-profile legal case against industry stars.

Star kids, including Alia Bhatt, Sara Ali Khan, Arjun Kapoor, Varun Dhawan and Sonam Kapoor, have received a major backlash online, with many saying they unfairly got priority due to their bloodline at the cost of more talented outsiders like Sushant.

Karan Johar, who has launched star kids like Ananya Panday, also received hate online from film fans around the world. Many of those caught in the nepotism tornado have lost hundreds of thousands of followers on social media.

Sonakshi decided to deactivate her Twitter account and turned off the comments on her Instagram after receiving a barrage of criticism. This ended up backfiring as most celebrated the actress leaving Twitter.

While most star kids remained quiet in the hopes of seeing the storm pass, others reacted in an entitled manner and this turned even more people against them. Sonam reacted with some ill-advised comments on social media and managed to magnify hate directed towards her.

Over 300 petitions were started asking people to boycott perpetrators of nepotism and to get justice for Sushant, with one getting nearly four million signatures. It hasn’t just been star kids who have been targeted, but also production houses that launch them into Bollywood at the cost of new talent.

The knock-on effect of the raging nepotism debate has also exposed a bullying culture in Bollywood where outsiders are treated badly by the inner circle for various reasons, which includes being threatened by new talent or them not towing the line.

Outsiders claiming their careers were destroyed by nepotism, bullying and corruption have also started speaking. These include Sahil Khan, who was hailed as the next big thing after his winning debut in 2001 film Style, but claims he was bullied out of Bollywood by a major star. One Bollywood insider told me this is potentially the biggest crisis an industry in cruise control has faced in a generation and there is genuine worry.

Sushant’s death has united people in a movement against Bollywood in a way not seen before and the knock-on effect will likely be felt when cinemas open again. In the past, Bollywood laughed off troubles and saw themselves as indestructible, but this is different and won’t go away anytime soon.

With more streaming sites, channels and choices than ever, cinema is no longer the only form of entertainment available in India and audiences can easily walk away from Bollywood. This is now giving those who have invested heavily in projects featuring star kids sleepless nights.

Instead of looking down on the world from  their thrones, Bollywood studios, stars and products of nepotism need to see that their castles are starting to crumble. Although, they will quickly forget about Sushant, for audiences he was an everyday man, just like them, trying to make a place in a nepotistic system.

In that regard, he has become a symbol of anger for those who feel they have been wronged and Bollywood has been wronging outsiders for a long time.

My realisation

THE nepotism debate raging online also made me realise how media have been duped by Bollywood to promote star kids ahead of outside talent, who have often been side-lined during publicity tours.

When Sushant Singh Rajput’s films Chhichhore and Kedarnath were released I was only given the option of interviewing his leading ladies Shraddha Kapoor and Sara Ali Khan, who are both star kids, but not him. I realised it has been a similar story when films featuring other star kids are released, which shows that nepotism stretches beyond casting and into marketing with Bollywood.

Harmful nepotism

FILM releases in 2019 featuring young stars with famous Bollywood relatives in a prominent lead role shows how nepotism is doing more harm than good in Hindi cinema. A simple look at the films’ respective box office performances illustrates this.

Ek Ladki Ko Dekha Toh Aisa Laga: FLOP

Gully Boy: HIT

Kalank: DISASTER

Blank: DISASTER

Student Of The Year 2: AVERAGE

India’s Most Wanted: DISASTER

Jabariya Jodi: DISASTER

Chhichhore: HIT

The Zoya Factor: DISASTER

Pal Pal Dil Ke Paas: DISASTER

War: SUPER HIT

Motichoor Chaknachoor: DISASTER

Panipat: DISASTER

Pati Patni Aur Woh: HIT

More For You

​Dilemmas of dating in a digital world

We are living faster than ever before

AMG

​Dilemmas of dating in a digital world

Shiveena Haque

Finding romance today feels like trying to align stars in a night sky that refuses to stay still

When was the last time you stumbled into a conversation that made your heart skip? Or exchanged a sweet beginning to a love story - organically, without the buffer of screens, swipes, or curated profiles? In 2025, those moments feel rarer, swallowed up by the quickening pace of life.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Mahmood’s rise exposes Britain’s diversity paradox

Shabana Mahmood, US homeland security secretary Kristi Noem, Canada’s public safety minister Gary Anandasangaree, Australia’s home affairs minister Tony Burke and New Zealand’s attorney general Judith Collins at the Five Eyes security alliance summit on Monday (8)

Comment: Mahmood’s rise exposes Britain’s diversity paradox

PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer’s government is not working. That is the public verdict, one year in. So, he used his deputy Angela Rayner’s resignation to hit the reset button.

It signals a shift in his own theory of change. Starmer wanted his mission-led government to avoid frequent shuffles of his pack, so that ministers knew their briefs. Such a dramatic reshuffle shows that the prime minister has had enough of subject expertise for now, gambling instead that fresh eyes may bring bold new energy to intractable challenges on welfare and asylum.

Keep ReadingShow less
indian-soldiers-ww1-getty
Indian infantrymen on the march in France in October 1914 during World War I. (Photo: Getty Images)
Getty Images

Comment: We must not let anti-immigration anger erase south Asian soldiers who helped save Britain

This country should never forget what we all owe to those who won the second world war against fascism. So the 80th anniversary of VE Day and VJ Day this year have had a special poignancy in bringing to life how the historic events that most of us know from grainy black and white photographs or newsreel footage are still living memories for a dwindling few.

People do sometimes wonder if the meaning of these great historic events will fade in an increasingly diverse Britain. If we knew our history better, we would understand why that should not be the case.

For the armies that fought and won both world wars look more like the Britain of 2025 in their ethnic and faith mix than the Britain of 1945 or 1918. The South Asian soldiers were the largest volunteer army in history, yet ensuring that their enormous contribution is fully recognised in our national story remains an important work in progress.

Keep ReadingShow less
Spotting the signs of dementia

Priya Mulji with her father

Spotting the signs of dementia

How noticing the changes in my father taught me the importance of early action, patience, and love

I don’t understand people who don’t talk or see their parents often. Unless they have done something to ruin your lives or you had a traumatic childhood, there is no reason you shouldn’t be checking in with them at least every few days if you don’t live with them.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Populist right thrives amid polarised migration debate

DIVISIVE AGENDA:Police clash withprotesters outside Epping councilafter a march from the Bell Hotelhousing asylum seekers last Sunday(31)

Getty Images

Comment: Populist right thrives amid polarised migration debate

August is dubbed 'the silly season’ as the media must fill the airwaves with little going on. But there was a more sinister undertone to how that vacation news vacuum got filled this year. The recurring story of the political summer was the populist right’s confidence in setting the agenda and the anxiety of opponents about how to respond.

Tensions were simmering over asylum. Yet frequent predictions of mass unrest failed to materialise. The patchwork of local protests and counter-protests had a strikingly different geography to last summer. The sporadic efforts of disorder came in the affluent southern suburbs of Epping and Hillingdon, Canary Wharf and Cheshunt with no disorder and few large protests in the thirty towns that saw riots last August. Prosecutions, removing local ringleaders, deter. Local cohesion has been a higher priority where violence broke out than everywhere else. Hotel use for asylum has halved - and is more common in the south. The Home Office went to court to keep asylum seekers in Epping’s Bell Hotel, for now, yet stresses its goal to stop using hotels by 2029. The Refugee Council’s pragmatic suggestion of giving time-limited leave to remain to asylum seekers from the five most dangerous countries could halve the need for hotels within months.

Keep ReadingShow less