There was no delay on part of the Gujarat government in requisitioning the Army to deal with post-Godhra 2002 Gujarat riots, Union Home Minister Amit Shah said and noted that former Punjab DGP KPS Gill had termed the state government's action as "prompt and neutral".
He also attacked Congress over anti-Sikh riots in 1984, saying that so many Sikhs were killed "but nothing was done for three days". "The Gujarat government did not delay in anything. When the Gujarat Bandh was declared, we called the Army. The Army needed some time to reach. There was not even a day's delay by the Gujarat government and this was also appreciated by the court," Shah told ANI in an interview.
The minister's remarks came after the Supreme Court on Friday dismissed the plea filed by Zakia Jafri, widow of former Congress MP Ehsan Jafri, challenging the clean chit given by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) to then Chief Minister Narendra Modi and several others in 2002 Gujarat riots.
"The Army headquarters is situated in Delhi and there are a lot of army men in the city but despite that so many Sikhs were killed (during the 1984 anti-Sikh riots) but nothing was done for three days. How many SITs were constituted then? An SIT was constituted after our government came to power. How many were arrested?" Shah said while questioning the Congress-led government during the 1984 Sikh riots.
"I think PM Modi did everything because I was observing the situation very closely. I think no CM would have dealt with the situation in this way. For example, there are 100-150 cops in one police station, if we put additional force, then it amounts to only 400. If there is a gathering of around two lakh people it takes time to control the situation in the state. Every action including lathi-charge, firing etc was taken to control the riots in Gujarat riots, 900 people were killed in firing," Shah said.
He referred to remarks of KPS Gill, who was among the officers credited with ending terrorism in Punjab.
"It takes time for the government to make arrangements to control a situation like riots. Gill Sahab had also come to help the Modi government at that time in Gujarat. I also had dinner with him. He himself told me that he had not seen such a prompt and neutral action in his whole life. However, allegations were raised even against Gill Sahab," the union minister said.
A Supreme Court bench headed by Justice AM Khanwilkar on Friday said that it found the appeal by Zakia Jafri as "devoid of merit."
Speaking about Friday's ruling of the apex court, Shah said: "The state government made all the efforts to control the Gujarat riots and had taken the right decisions at the right time. The court also said that the state government had controlled the situation with less damage."
Shah said all allegations against Modi were "politically motivated."
"First of all, this is not a clean chit. The Supreme Court has dismissed all allegations and also commented on why the allegations were levelled. In a way, the Supreme Court verdict has proved that these allegations were politically motivated," the union minister said.
Ehsan Jafri was among 69 people killed during violence at the Gulbarg Society in Ahmedabad on February 28, 2002. Zakia Jafri challenged the SIT's clean chit to 64 people including Narendra Modi who was the then Gujarat Chief Minister.
The Home Minister said the Supreme Court bench has dismissed all false charges against Modi.
"It was also said that some politically motivated people with vested interest levelled those allegations. The blot on the BJP government's image was also washed."
The Union Home Minister rubbished allegations against the then BJP-led Gujarat government and said that such allegations were propagated in a big way by certain journalists, political parties and NGOs.
"What was the allegation? It was alleged that the government and Chief Minister were also involved. This was the allegation. Nobody is denying that riots did not take place. Riots took place in many parts of the country."
"Political parties opposed to the BJP, some people who become journalists due to a specific ideology and some NGOs - the troika together propagated such allegations in a big way. Their ecosystem was so strong that people started to believe lies as truth," Shah said.
The Home Minister said that the government never interfered in the functioning of the media. "This is not our attitude, we had neither done such a thing then nor do we do so at present. But the ecosystem of that time presented lies in front of the people in such a way that it influenced everyone," Shah added.
In April, Mallya lost an appeal against a London high court bankruptcy order in a case involving over ₹11,101 crore (approx. £95.7 million) debt to lenders including the State Bank of India. (Photo: Getty Images)
FUGITIVE tycoon Vijay Mallya has said he may consider returning to India if he is assured of a fair trial.
He spoke to Raj Shamani on a four-hour-long podcast released on Thursday.
When asked if his situation worsened because he didn’t return to India, Mallya said, “If I have assurance of a fair trial and a dignified existence in India, you may be right, but I don’t.” Asked if he would consider coming back if given such an assurance, he responded, “If I am assured, absolutely, I will think about it seriously.”
He added, “There are other people who the government of India is targeting for extradition from the UK back to India in whose case, they have got a judgment from the high court of appeal that Indian detention conditions are violative of article 3 of the ECHR (European Convention on Human Rights) and therefore they can’t be sent back.”
On being labelled a “fugitive”, Mallya said, “Call me a fugitive for not going to India post-March (2016). I didn’t run away, I flew out of India on a prescheduled visit… fair enough, I did not return for reasons that I consider are valid… but where is the ‘chor’ (thief) coming from… where is the ‘chori’ (theft)?”
The Indian government has not responded to Mallya’s claims.
In April, Mallya lost an appeal against a London high court bankruptcy order in a case involving over ₹11,101 crore (approx. £95.7 million) debt to lenders including the State Bank of India.
In February, he moved the Karnataka High Court seeking details of loan recoveries. His legal counsel said banks had recovered ₹14,000 crore (approx. £120.7 million) despite the original dues being ₹6,200 crore (approx. £53.4 million). The court issued notices to banks and loan recovery officers.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
The incident occurred in Bengaluru on Wednesday, when hundreds of thousands gathered to celebrate with the RCB team, including star player Virat Kohli, after their IPL final win against Punjab Kings. (Photo: Getty Images)
INDIAN police have arrested two people, including a senior executive of Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB), after 11 fans died in a stampede during celebrations for the team’s first-ever Indian Premier League (IPL) title, according to media reports on Friday.
The incident occurred in Bengaluru on Wednesday, when hundreds of thousands gathered to celebrate with the RCB team, including star player Virat Kohli, after their IPL final win against Punjab Kings. The stampede took place near the M Chinnaswamy Stadium, where the team was parading the trophy.
India Today reported that Nikhil Sosale, RCB’s head of marketing, was arrested at the Bengaluru airport. The Indian Express said he was arrested along with an executive from an event management company.
The stampede has led to widespread anger. Several top police officers, including the city’s police commissioner, have been suspended. Karnataka chief minister Siddaramaiah said that “legal action has been taken against the representatives of RCB”, the event organisers, and the state’s cricket association.
A first information report (FIR), which initiates a police investigation, has been filed against them, Siddaramaiah said. Local reports stated that charges include culpable homicide not amounting to murder, among others.
There has been no comment from RCB so far.
Siddaramaiah also blamed some senior police officials. “These officers appear to be irresponsible and negligent and it has been decided to suspend them,” he said.
The victims, mostly between the ages of 14 and 29, were among the large crowds that had gathered on the streets to see the players. Siddaramaiah said that the stadium's capacity was 35,000 but “200,000–300,000 people came”.
RCB has announced financial aid of $11,655 to each of the victims' families, calling the deaths “unfortunate”. Indian media reported that the team won $2.3 million in prize money.
Virat Kohli, who top-scored in the final, said he was “at a loss for words” after the celebrations turned tragic. Prime Minister Narendra Modi described the incident as “absolutely heartrending”.
Deadly crowd incidents are not uncommon at large public gatherings in India, including religious events, due to safety lapses and poor crowd control.
The Hindu, in its Friday editorial, wrote, “The grim truth is that the fan, who drives the commerce of every sport, is the last priority for administrators.” It said “asphyxia was the primary cause of death besides injuries suffered in the stifling rush”.
The IPL sold its broadcast rights for five seasons in 2022 for $6.2 billion, making it one of the world’s most valuable sports leagues in terms of cost per match.
“The world’s richest cricket tournament can’t cut corners when it comes to fans’ safety,” wrote the Indian Express in its editorial. “A fitting tribute to those dead, therefore, is not mere signing a cheque but holding those in charge responsible – ensuring that heads roll, and those who dropped the ball Wednesday are made to pay.”
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Ryanair issued a statement apologising to passengers affected by the incident
Eight passengers were injured when a Ryanair flight from Berlin to Milan encountered severe turbulence and was forced to divert to an airport in southern Germany, Bavarian police have confirmed.
The incident occurred on Wednesday evening, with the aircraft landing at Memmingen Airport, west of Munich, at 8.44pm local time (6.44pm GMT). Among those injured were a two-year-old child who suffered bruising and a woman with a head injury. Police said three individuals were taken to hospital for further treatment, while others received medical attention at the airport.
According to police, the flight was unable to land at its intended destination of Munich Airport due to poor weather conditions. The turbulence prompted the flight captain to call ahead for medical assistance, and the aircraft landed safely without further incident.
A total of 179 passengers and six crew members were on board the flight. As a precaution, all passengers were checked for injuries. The ages of those injured ranged from two to 59 years.
Ryanair issued a statement apologising to passengers affected by the incident. The airline said: “This flight from Berlin to Milan (5 June) diverted to Memmingen after experiencing severe turbulence over Germany. The captain requested medical assistance ahead of landing, and the aircraft landed normally. Ryanair sincerely apologises to passengers affected by this diversion.”
Following the landing, the Southern Bavaria Aviation Authority did not approve an onward flight on Wednesday evening. Ryanair arranged alternative transport to Milan for passengers that night and provided a replacement flight the following morning.
The airline did not confirm the cause of the turbulence but weather-related issues were cited by local authorities. The situation was handled on site by emergency responders and local officials.
The incident comes as parts of central Europe have experienced unsettled weather conditions this week, including thunderstorms and heavy rainfall.
Despite the unexpected diversion and injuries, police noted that the aircraft landed safely and that all necessary medical protocols were followed.
Keep ReadingShow less
Worshippers are strongly encouraged to walk to the mosque if possible
A major change has been announced regarding Birmingham’s Eid ul Adha 2025 celebrations, with the annual Eid in the Park event cancelled due to bad weather.
Green Lane Masjid and Community Centre (GLMCC), which organises the city’s large outdoor Eid prayer, confirmed that this year’s gathering at Small Heath Park will no longer go ahead. The decision was made following heavy rainfall and a forecast of continued poor weather across Thursday and into the morning of Eid ul Adha, which falls on Friday, 6 June.
Instead, prayers will now be held indoors at the mosque itself, with staggered prayer sessions scheduled throughout the morning to accommodate the thousands of worshippers expected to attend. The mosque, located in the Small Heath area of Birmingham, follows Eid dates based on Saudi Arabian announcements. This year, both Saudi Arabia and the UK are observing Eid ul Adha on the same date, although some countries will mark it on Saturday, 7 June.
GLMCC said in a statement: “Green Lane Masjid will be holding Eid ul Adha prayers indoors at the Masjid. This is due to heavy rain today and a forecast of continued rain throughout the day and into tomorrow morning. We have assessed the park and, given the current and expected weather conditions, we have made the decision to move the Eid prayers indoors for the safety and comfort of all attendees.”
The Eid in the Park event, originally scheduled for 9am on Friday at Small Heath Park, typically attracts thousands of people from across the city and beyond. The cancellation marks a significant change to the city’s Eid ul Adha celebrations.
To manage the large turnout, GLMCC has arranged five indoor prayer sessions at its mosque on Friday, 6 June:
6 am – Sheikh Hassan Ali
7 am – Sheikh Abdul Hadi
8 am – Sheikh Aqeel Mahmood
9am – Qari Zakaullah Saleem
10 am – Sheikh Hafeezullah
Men will use the Main Prayer Hall, the Sisters' Prayer Hall, and the Basement. Entry will be via Doors H and G (Little Green Lane, opposite Morrisons) and exit via Doors A and G. Women will be accommodated in the Community Hall and School Area, with entry through Door E (Clock Tower entrance) and exit through Doors F and F1. A one-way system will be in operation throughout the premises.
GLMCC has advised attendees to bring their own bags for shoes, as part of efforts to reduce plastic usage. “There is a provision at the Masjid for bags but we are conscious of reducing the usage of plastic,” the statement added.
Worshippers are strongly encouraged to walk to the mosque if possible. Those who need to drive are asked to park considerately, including using the nearby Morrisons car park, avoid blocking driveways or other vehicles, and allow extra time for traffic. Courteous and patient behaviour is being urged throughout the event.
Despite the change in location, GLMCC aims to ensure a smooth and safe celebration for all. Worshippers are still expected to come together in prayer and reflection, sharing greetings of Eid Mubarak as the Muslim community marks one of the most significant festivals of the Islamic calendar.
Keep ReadingShow less
The portrait is painted by British artist Clare Leighton (Photo: Bonhams auction house)
AN OIL painting of Mahatma Gandhi created during his 1931 visit to the UK will be sold at auction in London next month.
Painted by British artist Clare Leighton, the portrait is being described by auction house Bonhams as "thought to be the only oil portrait that Gandhi actually sat for", reported the BBC.
Leighton created the work when Gandhi came to London for the second Round Table conference, which aimed to discuss constitutional reforms and India's demands for self-governance.
The painting will go under the hammer in the second week of July at Bonhams auction house.
"This is a painting of unique historic and cultural significance. It would be great if it could be seen and appreciated more widely, whether in India or elsewhere," said Caspar Leighton, the artist's great nephew.
According to Bonhams, Leighton "was one of the very few artists admitted to his office and was given the opportunity to sit with on multiple occasions to sketch and paint his likeness".
Report said that Leighton gained access to Gandhi through her partner Henry Noel Brailsford, a British political journalist who strongly supported India's independence movement.
In November 1931, Leighton displayed her Gandhi portraits at an exhibition at the Albany Galleries in London. Though Gandhi did not attend the opening, several Indian delegation representatives from the Round Table conference were present, including prominent independence leader Sarojini Naidu.
The exhibition featured both the oil portrait now being auctioned and a charcoal sketch of Gandhi sleeping in his office.
British journalist Winifred Holtby wrote about the painting: "The little man squats bare-headed, in his blanket, one finger raised, as it often is to emphasise a point, his mouth parted for a word that is almost a smile".
Gandhi's personal secretary Mahadev Desai later wrote to Leighton, saying: "many of my friends who saw it [the oil portrait] in the Albany Gallery said to me that it was a good likeness".
According to the BBC, the portrait remained in Leighton's collection until her death in 1989 in the US, when it passed to her family.
After the 1931 London exhibition, there is no public record of the oil portrait being displayed again until 1978, when the Boston Public Library organised an exhibition of Leighton's works.
However, the artist's family believes the portrait was shown in the US during the 1970s, where it was allegedly damaged in a knife attack carried out by a right-wing Hindu activist. A label on the painting's backing shows it was restored by the Lyman Allyn Museum Conservation Laboratory in Connecticut in 1974.