MPs call for public inquiry amid fresh allegations of bias by ‘scared’ Asian staff
by Barnie Choudhury
THE BBC’s new director general, Tim Davie, will be questioned by MPs over claims of “insidious, toxic and covert racism” in the corporation after Eastern Eye’s exposé last week prompted further complaints from current and former staff.
Davie, who started in his new post last week, is to appear before the digital, culture, media and sport (DCMS) parliamentary select committee in the next few weeks, in what has been described as “a big session”.
Earlier this week, in a letter to the select committee seen by this newspaper, Labour MP for Brent Central, Dawn Butler said, “I believe the substantive allegations in Eastern Eye suggest we have a problem in an institution which is publicly owned and should be held to account.”
Butler’s comments come as Davie addressed BBC staff last Thursday (3), pledging to create a “modern 50/20/12 organisation” that reflects “more accurately the society we serve”, with 50 per cent women and 50 per cent men, at least 20 per cent BAME, and at least 12 per cent disabled staff.
Following the allegations revealed in Eastern Eye last week, dozens of current BBC staff contacted the newspaper to describe their experiences of racial prejudice and how they have been held back at work because of their ethnicity. One Asian manager said they had been threatened with redundancy at least twice, while another told how they were on anti-depressants because of stress brought on by bullying at work.
Senior parliamentarians as well as Asian and black journalists have demanded an independent public inquiry into allegations that the BBC is “systemically, structurally and institutionally racist”.
Labour MP for Slough and shadow railways minister Tan Dhesi said, “The testimony from former and current staff is gut-wrenching. It paints a picture of pain and mental health impact which simply can’t go on. Racism has no part in our country or in our public institutions and it cannot be tolerated.
“It is time that the BBC is held to account and for someone to independently investigate these serious allegations.”
Claudia Webbe, Labour’s MP for Leicester East, said she stood “in solidarity with all BBC workers who have bravely shared their experience of racism”.
“Only by shining a light can we eradicate the disease of institutional racism. That means a full public inquiry into the systemic racism of our public service broadcaster. I will do all I can in parliament to push for this to happen. It is up to the government to enforce existing recommendations to combat this evil.”
Shadow employment minister and Feltham and Heston MP, Seema Malhotra, told Eastern Eye that last year, more than 100 of her Labour parliamentary colleagues signed her letter to the-then director general, Tony Hall, in protest over the censuring of BBC Breakfast presenter Naga Munchetty, who criticised US president Donald Trump.
“The stories coming out from the BBC are extremely worrying and cannot be ignored. The BBC is a treasured national institution and public service broadcaster, with a remit to serve the whole nation. We expect the very highest standards from the BBC which plays a huge part in our national life,” Malhotra said.
After the article was published last week, dozens of current BBC staff contacted Eastern Eye to tell their stories.
“One junior black colleague was ordered by an older white journalist to move desks, even though they were sat five metres apart,” recounted one BAME employee. “When their line manager intervened on hearing the row, the white journalist said they weren’t comfortable because ‘of the BAME pandemic problem’. They were basically accusing their black and Asian colleagues of spreading the (corona)virus.”
In another instance, a black journalist looking for a desk to work from was asked by a white colleague if they were the cleaner. Although no action was taken against the white journalist, Eastern Eye understands they were spoken to about their “inappropriate assumption and comment”.
An Asian staff member who has been in the BBC for almost 20 years said, “One of my white colleagues is bullying and victimising me. Things came to a head when one of my parents died, and I couldn’t take it anymore, so I went to my editor to complain.
“They called us both into a room, and said they did not believe me because they had known my colleague a long time and knew they were incapable of being racist. The white colleague was asked to leave, and my editor said I should apologise to the person who’s still making my life hell.
“If your boss doesn’t believe you, what’s the point of making a formal complaint? I’m now on anti-depressants.”
As reported last week, freedom of information (FOI) requests during 2006 and 2015 showed that the BBC settled 101 cases relating to unfair and wrongful dismissal, discrimination over disability, sex, race, age, claim for holiday pay as well as victimisation.
Last week Eastern Eye revealed that a FOI request found between 2005 and the end of 2010, 16 people filed claims for racial discrimination. The BBC settled five cases without admitting liability.
Eastern Eye can also reveal this week that the BBC attempted to silence those who complained about racism by inserting a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) clause into their settlements.
Since the publication of these figures, Eastern Eye has been contacted by some who settled racial discrimination and victimisation cases. The paper has learned that they had to sign an NDA, which forbids them from ever saying anything negative about the BBC.
“They try to exert their power over you even after you’ve left, and they still monitor what you say in public,” said one complainant who settled with the BBC. “They subtly let you know they’re watching your every move even though you left years ago. The pressure they put you under is so bad that I have nightmares to this day about what I went through.
“Racism is real in the BBC, and people should be believed when they complain.”
Eastern Eye understands that it has been BBC policy since the end of August 2018 that employees do not have to sign an NDA – but only when it comes to the terms and negotiations of or existence of a settlement agreement, or the circumstances leading up to its agreement. Furthermore, NDAs can still be part of a settlement if a director approves it.
This newspaper has been told repeatedly that young south Asian and black staff are simply too afraid to say anything or go to their unions.
“Many aren’t even union members because they’re afraid of joining in case they’re labelled as troublemakers,” said one senior south Asian veteran.
“I’ve spoken to them, and in a short time, they realise that everything the BBC says about diversity, equality and respect is crap. It has rules, guidelines and ambitions. Mangers give us talks, but don’t follow up with deeds.”
The union BECTU, which is aware that people are afraid to speak out, has asked Marcus Ryder, a visiting professor at Birmingham City University and a former BBC executive, to investigate and suggest how to combat this problem.
“Right now, there isn’t a safe place where those Eastern Eye has spoken to, who have faced racism, to go to have their experiences heard,” said Ryder. “There’s no place which is systematically recording these incidents so that broadcasters can learn from their experiences. The industry can’t exist on the goodwill of editors at Eastern Eye to capture what people are going through.”
BECTU head, Philippa Childs, has written to Davie asking the new BBC head to meet broadcast unions urgently to tackle the problems Eastern Eye has reported.
“We’re past the point where broadcasters can deal with this themselves and we have to have external and independent scrutiny,” said Childs. “I’m shocked that employees feel their reputation will be damaged if they seek help from their union, and I’m surprised by the blatant and casual racism they’re suffering.”
A BBC spokesperson said, “We have a zero tolerance approach to bullying and harassment, of any kind, and that is why we have robust processes in place for staff to raise complaints, which are dealt with the utmost seriousness.”
Eastern Eye has learned that since the death of George Floyd in America at the hands of white police officers in May, the BBC has been holding a series of “listening exercises”.
One south Asian veteran said, “For 20 minutes they go on about what a great place the BBC is, as if it’s fact, that we’re lucky to work here. Then they go into rules of impartiality.
“In one meeting, colleagues asked why it was fine to tweet and go on climate change and pride marches, but they couldn’t openly support the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement? The manager replied that climate change and homophobia were real, racism was not.”
The BBC press office did not deny that managers have made these comments. Eastern Eye has spoken to other black and Asian journalists who confirm this has been said to groups in public meetings. They have told this newspaper that white senior managers get very angry and defensive when confronted with concerns from BAME employees.
Two journalists separately complained to Eastern Eye about the inability of white managers at the BBC to listen to BAME concerns. “In one meeting Fran (Unsworth, director of BBC News) was heard entering a lift saying ‘God, they were a braying mob, weren’t they?’” recounted one journalist of colour.
A BBC spokesperson said, “Fran Unsworth has no recollection of the statement. The BBC is absolutely clear that we are an inclusive and welcoming organisation and we are saddened if anyone is experiencing any form of discrimination at work.”
An unwitting lack of cultural sensitivity is not limited to remarks possibly made in the heat of the moment. Some BBC managers have upset south Asians who have been grieving the death of close family members.
“My father died suddenly, and as the only son I became head of the family,” recounted one. “As a Hindu, it’s not as simple as arranging the funeral, hosting a wake and it’s all over. We wash the body, we perform rituals across 12 months, and if your mum is left alone, you make sure she moves in with you.
“After a week, my boss rang me and said I needed to return to work. I tried to explain, but they wouldn’t listen, so I had to go over their head to be left alone. It was awful because my head was all over the place, and here was this person who just didn’t get it. Another Asian would have understood.”
The BBC would not give Eastern Eye its policy on dealing with bereavement.
Even at the highest echelons it appears BAME senior leaders are not immune to racism. Some current and former managers told Eastern Eye that the BBC turns against them once they refuse to ignore racial discrimination or victimisation.
“We keep quiet because we know what’s good for us, and if we don’t play the game then it’s career suicide,” said a senior Asian manager.
“In the past decade I’ve been threatened with redundancy at least twice. I’ve seen white bosses slot in white colleagues into made-up positions to save them, but I’ve had to interview for jobs, with external candidates, with no guarantee of getting them, despite turning a blind eye to the racism that so obviously exists. My advice to any BAME is to forget about loyalty to the BBC, and never trust anything that comes out of their mouths.”
In his speech last week, Davie promised to hold managers to account on their diversity figures.
While some BAME staff within the BBC have welcomed this as proof that a new broom could bring changes, other veterans, who have a combined experience of more than 150 years in the BBC, are more sceptical.
One said, “We’ve been here so often, taken to the mountain top and jumped off without a parachute. It just won’t happen. Davie won’t be allowed to change the ethnic make-up of the BBC at leadership level.
“The gatekeepers want the status quo, they don’t want to see brown or black people with real power.”
In an email after last week’s story, the BBC asked Eastern Eye to reflect that it publishes more diversity data than any other media company and more than is required. Yet that information is not always clear or easy to understand.
Over a six-year period, this reporter sent in several FOI requests, and the responses are telling. Between 2005 and 2010, no black or Asian journalist in BBC News was recruited to the highest “senior manager” (SM) band, while during that same time period, seven white people made the grade.
A former Asian senior manager told Eastern Eye, “Without figures, the BBC can say anything they like. Every step of the way, we had to spin to our teams to make out we were doing brilliantly, we had to toe the corporate line, when the fact of the matter was that we weren’t doing that great at all. What you found out says it all, figures don’t lie. News has always been the problem and it will always be the problem.”
The BBC also stalls on providing transparent data. It took three attempts and the intervention of the Information Commissioner’s Office to find out how many BAME staff there were in the SM grades in BBC News. Eastern Eye can reveal that the number peaked in 2005 at six, but dropped sharply to two by 2010. Even today it is impossible to know how many “senior leader or SL” journalists in BBC News are of colour.
But it is unlikely to be too many, because the BBC’s 2018-19 annual report noted that in the entire organisation, out of almost 21,000 people, only 16 of 224, or 7.1 per cent, in the senior leader band are black or Asian. Put it another way, just 0.08 per cent people of colour in the entire BBC is in the senior leader rank.
“The BBC are very good at these flash announcements, but when you look under the bonnet, you realise it has no engine, and it’s fake news,” said one black member of staff. “What the BBC do is bring in loads of newbies on 12-month contracts, so they won’t speak out, and then they let them go. So, for their annual data, they have magically hit their 15 or 20 per cent targets. No one investigates what really happens, no one scrutinises career paths, how we’re treated or how stifled we are.”
Davie and the BBC are on a mission to return the corporation to its previous reputation of impartiality, which caused consternation when Munchetty was reprimanded for a comment about Trump.
But how far does that zeal run? Davie has made impartiality one of his top four priorities. “If you want to be an opinionated columnist or a partisan campaigner on social media, then that is a valid choice, but you should not be working at the BBC,” he said last week.
One south Asian told Eastern Eye, “We know they’re monitoring our tweets, but we’re also fearful about what we’re writing in our emails. I advised one colleague who had written to me that they should delete the email they just sent me. It was about their experiences in the BBC and the racism they had faced, but I thought it was a good reason, during these times, for anyone looking for an excuse to sack someone for that old chestnut ‘bringing the organisation into disrepute’.”
The BBC would not comment on these allegations. Instead it pointed Eastern Eye to its new editorial guideline which can be confusing. It appears to be acceptable to march in certain events under a BBC banner, but “BBC News and Current Affairs staff and some Factual staff, as set out in the guidelines, should not participate in public demonstrations or gatherings about controversial issues”.
It refused to explain what “controversial” meant or whether BBC News employees were banned from supporting anti-racism or BLM marches.
A spokesperson said, “The BBC is not impartial on racism and this is fully consistent with the editorial guidelines. While the BBC is opposed to racism, it is not a campaigning organisation. Campaigns frequently advocate for legitimate social or policy change and the BBC must retain its independence in relation to them.”
Current and former journalists beg to differ. A former BAME executive said, “That’s ridiculous. Of course, the BBC campaigns and it has a proud history of campaigning. BBC One’s That’s Life and Esther Rantzen were responsible for launching ChildLine (the first national helpline for young people in distress).
“Remember their national profile changed the way children were questioned in court through video link. And you just have to search the website. The BBC still has webpages of its education campaigns, social action campaigns and volunteering campaigns.”
If you are a current or former BBC staffer and would like to share your views, email editor@easterneye.biz
If you have been affected by any of the issues mentioned here, contact Samaritans free of charge on 116 123 or call Mind charity on 0300 123 3393
Yusuf, who resigned as Reform chairman last week before returning two days later, said he wanted to be 'crystal clear' on the party’s stance. (Photo: Getty Images)
ZIA YUSUF has said that Reform UK would deport every illegal immigrant in Britain if the party came to power.
Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Yusuf stated, “We will deport everybody who is here in this country illegally, which is roughly about 1.2 million people.”
Yusuf, who resigned as Reform chairman last week before returning two days later, said he wanted to be “crystal clear” on the party’s stance.
Addressing recent criticisms within the party, he added, “I am Muslim. I don’t therefore think that Islam is a ‘threat to the country’,” but said “resentment” was building due to “two-tier policing.”
He said Islamist terrorism remained a major concern for intelligence agencies and pointed to issues of assimilation. Yusuf described his resignation as a result of “exhaustion” and regretted a tweet criticising new MP Sarah Pochin’s comments on a burqa ban.
Nigel Farage is expected to present Yusuf as a potential cabinet minister while also pledging to reopen some coal mines in south Wales.
Richard Tice, Reform deputy, said Yusuf had faced “horrendous online abuse” and added the party was reorganising to manage growth. Nick Candy will take over Yusuf’s former responsibilities.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
The teenager was walking along Staniforth Road in the Darnall area on Wednesday when a grey Audi reportedly hit an electric bike rider before striking Abdullah. (Photo credit: South Yorkshire Police)
TWO men have been charged with murder and three counts of attempted murder after the death of a 16-year-old boy in an alleged hit-and-run in Sheffield.
Zulkernain Ahmed, 20, and Amaan Ahmed, 26, both from Locke Drive, have been charged over the death of Abdullah Yaser Abdullah Al Yazidi, according to South Yorkshire Police.
The teenager was walking along Staniforth Road in the Darnall area on Wednesday when a grey Audi reportedly hit an electric bike rider before striking Abdullah. He later died in hospital.
An 18-year-old man on the bike was seriously injured but is not believed to be in a life-threatening condition.
The two men are due to appear at Sheffield Magistrates’ Court on Monday. A 46-year-old man and a 45-year-old woman arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender remain on bail.
Abdullah had recently arrived in the UK from Yemen and was preparing to start college. Family and friends said he was devoted to his family and had been learning English.
Darnall councillor Qais Al-Ahdal said, “We’ve really lost someone who is good in the community… May God have mercy on his soul.”
Keep ReadingShow less
Israel had vowed in advance to prevent the ship from reaching Gaza
Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg was among a group of pro-Palestinian campaigners on board a Gaza-bound aid vessel intercepted by Israeli forces and diverted to its shores, the country’s Foreign Ministry confirmed on 9 June.
The ship, Madleen, was organised by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, a group challenging Israel’s blockade of Gaza. It had departed Sicily on 1 June, carrying a dozen activists and a symbolic amount of humanitarian supplies.
Israeli military blocks flotilla’s progress
Israel had vowed in advance to prevent the ship from reaching Gaza. Defence Minister Yoav Gallant said the military was instructed to stop the vessel “by any means necessary”. The Foreign Ministry later confirmed the Madleen had been redirected to Israel and that its passengers would be repatriated.
In a social media post, the ministry dismissed the effort as a publicity stunt by “celebrities”, referring to it as the “‘selfie yacht’ of the ‘celebrities’”. It accused Thunberg and others of staging a “media provocation”. Footage released showed passengers in life jackets being offered sandwiches and water after interception.
The Freedom Flotilla Coalition claimed it lost contact with the ship after alarms were triggered and drones were seen overhead. The group accused the Israeli military of “kidnapping” the activists. Surveillance footage appeared to show a vessel approaching and personnel boarding the Madleen.
Thunberg voices opposition to blockade
Greta Thunberg, known globally for her environmental activism, has been a strong critic of Israel’s actions in Gaza. Speaking last week, she said, “No matter what odds we are against, we have to keep trying... it’s not even near as dangerous as the silence of the entire world in the face of the live-streamed genocide.”
Israeli Defence Minister Gallant responded sharply, calling Thunberg “an antisemite” and warning that the ship would not be allowed to reach its destination. “Israel will act against any attempt to breach the blockade or aid terrorist organisations,” he said.
Small-scale aid onboard
The Madleen carried a limited quantity of humanitarian goods, including baby formula, flour, rice, medical supplies, children’s prosthetics, and diapers. The Israeli Foreign Ministry called the shipment “tiny”, adding it was “less than a single truckload of aid”.
Israel, along with Egypt, has maintained a blockade on Gaza since Hamas took control of the region in 2007. While Israeli officials say the measure is needed to prevent arms smuggling, rights groups argue it restricts essential goods and worsens the humanitarian crisis.
Repeat of earlier flotilla efforts
This is not the first attempt by activists to challenge the blockade. In 2010, a similar flotilla mission involving the Mavi Marmara ended in bloodshed when Israeli commandos boarded the ship, resulting in the deaths of nine people. A tenth person later died from injuries sustained during the raid.
Israel said its forces were attacked with clubs and knives during the operation. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition described it as “an unlawful and deadly attack”, saying the Madleen’s mission was “a continuation of that legacy”.
A separate mission earlier this year was also thwarted when a ship named Conscience, departing from Tunisia and en route to Malta, caught fire following explosions near the vessel. No injuries were reported, but the mission was called off.
Aid distribution remains contentious
In parallel with the flotilla controversy, Israel has promoted a new aid delivery mechanism via the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. The group claims to have delivered over 1.1 million meals and 11 truckloads of food on 9 June across three distribution sites.
However, the initiative has faced criticism and has been boycotted by the UN and other major organisations. They accuse Israel of using humanitarian aid as a tool of control and allege that the new system sidelines independent oversight.
The foundation suspended operations temporarily on 8 June, citing threats from Hamas. A spokesperson claimed that local workers received warnings of “serious consequences” if they continued with the aid delivery programme.
Keep ReadingShow less
Several cars burn on North Los Angeles street during clashes between protesters and police on June 8, 2025 in Downtown Los Angeles, California, US. (Photo: Getty Images)
PROTESTERS set fire to vehicles and clashed with police in Los Angeles on Sunday after President Donald Trump sent National Guard troops to the city. Officers kept crowds away from the troops, who had been deployed as unrest entered a third day.
The protests were triggered by recent immigration raids carried out by federal officials, which have led to the arrest of dozens of people identified by authorities as undocumented migrants and gang members.
The raids began in broad daylight on Friday in a city with a large Latino population. The deployment of California’s National Guard — usually controlled by the state’s governor — was criticised by opponents who said Trump was escalating tensions. Trump has made strict immigration enforcement a central part of his second-term agenda.
"We didn’t have a problem until Trump got involved," California Governor Gavin Newsom wrote on X.
"This is a serious breach of state sovereignty — inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed. Rescind the order. Return control to California," he added.
At least three Waymo self-driving vehicles were set on fire on Sunday, and two others were vandalised as protesters moved through parts of downtown Los Angeles.
Traffic was stopped for over an hour on a major freeway while people gathered on the road. Officers from the California Highway Patrol dispersed them using flash-bangs and smoke grenades.
After a brief early confrontation outside a detention centre between Department of Homeland Security agents and a few dozen protesters, most clashes involved local police.
By early afternoon, Los Angeles Police Department officers set up containment lines away from federal buildings, keeping demonstrators from reaching armed National Guard troops from the 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, who were stationed in camouflage gear and helmets.
As night fell, groups of masked protesters remained in certain areas, with some throwing projectiles and fireworks.
The LAPD said 56 people had been arrested over two days, and three officers had sustained minor injuries.
‘Troops everywhere’
Trump defended the use of troops, suggesting more could be deployed in other parts of the country.
"You have violent people, and we are not going to let them get away with it," he told reporters. "I think you’re going to see some very strong law and order."
Asked if he would invoke the Insurrection Act, which allows the military to operate as domestic police, Trump said: "We’re looking at troops everywhere. We’re not going to let this happen to our country."
US Northern Command, part of the Department of Defense, said "approximately 500 Marines... are in a prepared-to-deploy status should they be necessary to augment and support" federal operations.
The National Guard is usually deployed for natural disasters or, occasionally, civil unrest, with the agreement of state officials.
Trump’s decision to send in the Guard without the governor’s consent is the first such move since 1965, during the civil rights era. Democrats, including former vice president Kamala Harris, criticised it. Harris called the move "a dangerous escalation meant to provoke chaos."
‘Intimidation’
Republicans supported Trump’s decision.
"I have no concern about that at all," said House Speaker Mike Johnson, accusing Newsom of "an inability or unwillingness to do what is necessary".
Protesters told AFP they believed the deployment was meant to deter dissent.
"I think it’s an intimidation tactic," said Thomas Henning. "These protests have been peaceful. There’s no one trying to do any sort of damage right now and yet you have the National Guard with loaded magazines and large guns standing around trying to intimidate Americans from exercising our First Amendment rights."
Marshall Goldberg, 78, said the presence of the troops made him feel "so offended."
"We hate what they’ve done with the undocumented workers, but this is moving it to another level of taking away the right to protest and the right to just peaceably assemble," he told AFP.
ICE raids in other US cities have led to smaller protests in recent months, but the unrest in Los Angeles is the most significant reaction to Trump’s immigration policies so far.
A CBS News poll conducted before the Los Angeles protests showed a slight majority of Americans supported the immigration crackdown.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Siddiq stepped down from her role in the UK government after being accused of benefiting from the administration led by former Bangladeshi prime minister Sheikh Hasina. (Photo: Getty Images)
FORMER UK minister Tulip Siddiq has requested a meeting with Bangladesh’s chief adviser Muhammad Yunus in London to discuss what she called a “misunderstanding” related to corruption allegations against her.
In a letter dated June 4, Siddiq asked for a chance to meet Yunus during his visit to the UK from June 10 to 13. Yunus is expected to meet King Charles and visit Downing Street to meet Keir Starmer during the trip.
Siddiq said she hoped the meeting would “help clear up the misunderstanding perpetuated by the anti-corruption committee in Dhaka that I have questions to answer about my mother's sister, the former prime minister of Bangladesh, Sheikh Hasina”.
“I am a UK citizen, born in London and representing the people of Hampstead and Highgate in parliament for the last decade. I have no property nor any business interests whatsoever in Bangladesh,” she said.
“I have sought to clarify this to the ACC, but they refuse to engage with my lawyers in London and apparently keep sending correspondence to a random address in Dhaka,” she added.
Allegations linked to land plot in Bangladesh
Siddiq stepped down from her role in the UK government after being accused of benefiting from the administration led by former Bangladeshi prime minister Sheikh Hasina. Her aunt, Hasina, was put on trial in absentia last week over crimes against humanity during her 15-year tenure as prime minister.
The Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) in Bangladesh alleged that Siddiq or her mother obtained a 7,200 sq ft plot of land through “abuse of power and influence”. Siddiq has denied the claim, and her legal team has called the accusations “politically motivated” and without basis.
Prothom Alo reported that Siddiq said she had not been contacted by authorities about the allegations.
Although she was cleared of any wrongdoing by the adviser on ministerial standards, Laurie Magnus, Siddiq resigned as economic secretary to the Treasury and city minister, saying the issue had become a “distraction” for Keir Starmer’s new government.
Arrest warrant issued in Bangladesh
Siddiq said she believed the accusations were part of a “politically motivated smear campaign” led by Hasina’s opponents.
She has yet to receive a reply from Yunus or his office, according to a source quoted by BD News. The source also said Siddiq did not understand why the ACC was pursuing her.
A warrant for Siddiq’s arrest was issued in Bangladesh last month. She said she was unaware of the warrant or of any court proceedings she was expected to attend.
Under the UK’s 2B extradition category, ministers and judges require clear evidence from Bangladesh before any arrest decision can be made.
Arrest warrants have also been issued for Siddiq’s mother, Rehana, and her siblings, who have all denied the allegations.