Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Asians in the media back Sangita Myska

Broadcaster LBC faces questions over presenter’s abrupt exit

Asians in the media back Sangita Myska

I BEGIN by saying I enjoy listening to LBC, especially Iain Dale, except on the subject of Israel, on which he tends to be uncharacteristically intemperate.

But LBC ought to be aware its reputation is being shredded as a broadcaster which welcomes contrasting points of view over the manner in which it decided not to renew Sangita Myska’s contract.


LBC is a private organisation and can hire and fire who it likes. But it should know that at Eastern Eye’s Arts, Culture & Theatre Awards (ACTA) last week, there was strong support for Sangita among the British Asian artistic fraternity. The actor Nitin Ganatra was one of many who promised to fight on her behalf.

Perhaps LBC should arrange a phone-in and put up a spokesperson to defend its decision to get rid of Sangita. There should be a neutral gatekeeper to ensure callers supporting Sangita aren’t omitted, possibly even a panel.

Some questions:

Did LBC sack her because of the way she questioned the Israeli government spokesman, Avi Hyman?

I expect the answer to be, “No, of course, not.”

Did the Israeli government complain? Did anyone else complain? What sort of pressure was put on LBC?

What sort of management discussions took place before the decision was taken not to renew her contract?

Is Vanessa Feltz a replacement for Sangita?

Again, I expect the answer to be, “No.”

Given senior managing editor Tom Cheal described Sangita’s contribution as “fantastic”, why get rid of her?

Has LBC asked Sangita not to discuss her departure with the press?

Since the presenter James O’Brien, hinted the audience figures for Sangita were declining, what were they? And just to put matters into context, what are the figures for other presenters over a period of time? Do they go up and down?

I would urge LBC to come clean on what really happened. Sangita’s sacking should not become a point of difference between LBC and Britain’s Asian community. I am sure there is an amicable solution which should involve Sangita’s reinstatement.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Tackling hostility against Muslims matters for everyone

Anti immigration protesters attend the 'Glasgow Reclaims The Streets From Far-right Hatred And Violence' anti-racism protest on June 13, 2026 in Glasgow, Scotland.

Getty Images

Tackling hostility against Muslims matters for everyone

Sunder Katwala

Born in the mid-1970s I felt part of a lucky generation, which gained from pushing back the overt racism of that era. When we talk about stronger “social norms”, what we mean is that few people thought that monkey chants at the football or racist jokes on the telly were normal anymore – while more had Asian and black colleagues, neighbours and friends.

That past progress is put to the test today. A terrible crime in Belfast saw organised efforts at indiscriminate racist attacks on migrants and ethnic minorities, whose only connection to the crime was the colour of their skin. Those seeking to make racism fashionable again have the online megaphone of the world’s richest man, Elon Musk, on their side.

Past progress could be experienced unevenly, too. Being of mixed Indian and Irish Catholic parentage, I saw both identities rise in status once the BBC comedy Goodness Gracious Me inverted who could tell the jokes, and peace broke out in Northern Ireland. Yet, British Muslims of my generation felt under more intense scrutiny after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Efforts to tackle anti-Muslim hatred risked being stalled by arguments over what to call it and how to define it. The government’s new definition of anti-Muslim hostility seeks to transcend the confusion that the term “Islamophobia” could generate. But the challenge is not just to define the prejudice – but to find effective ways to shrink it.

There are sobering findings on the starting points in new research from British Future and the British Muslim Trust. More than half of British Muslims report experiencing prejudice based on their religion last year – a quarter in person and over a third online. A third of the public hold mostly negative views. One in six endorse sweeping and often indiscriminate hostility. Anti-Muslim hostility can have about twice the social reach as prejudice against other faith or ethnic minorities.

Tackling this hostility cannot be the responsibility of Muslims alone. It will take a whole-of-society effort. After all, this is foundationally about the attitudes towards a six per cent minority group, held among the 94 per cent of us who are not Muslim.

Keep ReadingShow less