Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Pro-India Cameron recognised importance of diaspora in Britain

By Amit Roy

ALTHOUGH David Cameron has been pilloried for calling the EU referendum, leading to a disunited kingdom from which Scotland might break away, I still make him the man of the decade – politically, at least, and very much from the Indian point of view.


The decade has ended with the election of another pro-India prime minister, Boris Johnson, who does indeed have the most diverse cabinet ever, with four British Asians, three of them of Indian origin – Priti Patel, Rishi Sunak and Alok Sharma. But it was Cameron who was the first in wanting to build “a new special relationship with India”. To that end, he appointed Priti as his “India diaspora champion”.

I went with Cameron to Delhi in 2010, the first of his three prime ministerial trips to India. In the December 12 general election, Indians voted overwhelmingly for the Tories. That was partly because they did not want the Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, as prime minister, but the Indian drift towards the Conservative party began when Edward Heath admitted the refugees expelled from Uganda and has been slowly gathering momentum over the years. What Cameron did was recognise the importance of the 2.5-million-strong Indian population in the UK.

The setting up of Conservative Friends of India by Lord Dolar Popat, among others, turned to be a crucial development for the Tories. Incidentally, his book about his journey from Uganda – A British Subject: How to Make It as an Immigrant in the Best Country in the World (foreword by David Cameron) – is one I have read and reread.

The recent election campaign damaged the relationship between Indians and Pakistanis and between Hindus and Muslims in the UK. It is in the interest of both sides to undo the harm that has been done, though it won’t be easy. Perhaps two recently made peers, Rami Ranger and Zameer Choudrey, will undertake leadership roles along with others.

The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, who is up for re-election in 2020, should try to improve his chances by doing a compromise deal with Uber – after all, it has become a way of life for 3.5 million people in London.

Where will we be in 10 years’ time? The outlook is for a Boris raj for the foreseeable future, but things will happen that are unknowable. Apart from the NHS, I would like another of his priorities to be housing for young people.

The Labour party took a wrong turn at the start of the decade when Ed Miliband knifed elder brother David Miliband to become its leader in a British version of the Ramayana. Let’s just say that Rebecca Long-Bailey, if she does indeed become Corbyn’s successor, is going to be an acquired taste.

As for Boris, I bet he is missing writing his weekly Telegraph column, with all the literary flourishes that gets him into trouble.

When the decade began, Barack Obama was US president, and all seemed well with America.

One hopes peace will come to India which seems a troubled country as the decade closes because of the unrest over the citizenship act. By the end of the next decade, we will know how it has been changed under Narendra Modi. India is a country with a very deep centre of gravity. What it desperately needs is a decade of peaceful progress.

More For You

How May elections could disrupt Britain’s political balance

Scottish Labour leader, Anas Sarwar speaks to media infront of the party’s Ad Van Campaign on May 04, 2026 in Bathgate, Scotland

Getty Images

How May elections could disrupt Britain’s political balance

Sunder Katwala

The tremors of the May 2026 elections could shift the tectonic plates of British politics. Attention will quickly turn to the Westminster aftershocks, including what the fallout of these national elections in Scotland and Wales alongside local elections across much of England, mean for Sir Keir Starmer’s future. Yet these seismic electoral upheavals merit scrutiny in their own right.

Wales is set for a once a century political earthquake. Labour has not just led the Welsh government since devolution began in 1999 - but won the most votes in every national election in Wales since 1922. Yet it now trails third, burdened by double incumbency in Cardiff Bay and Westminster, with the party watching the Welsh nationalists of Plaid Cymru and Reform’s pro-Brexit populists compete to top the polls. That contrast has polarised Wales - by age and geography - though a broad majority would prefer a government led by Plaid Cymru’s Rhun Ap Iowerth, with two-thirds hoping to keep Reform out.

Scotland could offer a rare pocket of political stability. John Swinney is the third Scottish first minister of a turbulent term after Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf, but may now secure a fifth term for his Scottish National Party. The trick to bucking the anti-incumbent trend has been to leverage his Edinburgh government being comparatively less unpopular than its London counterpart. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar sought to demonstrate his own distance from Westminster by calling for Starmer to resign, but his bid to lead Scotland, and become its second Asian First Minister, looks set to fall short.

Plaid Cymru leader Rhun ap IorwerthGetty Images

Keep ReadingShow less