CAMPAIGNERS have criticised a “wasted opportunity” as Tory lawmakers voted against amendments to a domestic abuse bill designed to protect migrant victims of domestic violence last week.
The Commons last Thursday (15) rejected three House of Lords-supported amendments to give migrant women with insecure immigration status equal security, excluding them from protections offered under the new bill.
Several organisations spoke to Eastern Eye following the news, expressing frustration that the amendments had been voted against by MPs.
Freedom charity founder Aneeta Prem said the opportunity to protect victims who were continuously ignored had been “wasted”. “There are groups of people already ignored, already hidden, because they are here with dubious immigration status, and have been fed a lie (by their abusers),” Prem told Eastern Eye on Monday (19). “(Victims) hide in terrible situations because they fear what the authorities will do will be much worse.
Freedom charity's Aneeta Prem said the opportunity to protect victims who were continuously ignored had been “wasted”
“Our hope was the bill would be an opportunity for a community which had been missed out in the past, and it’s a shame because it seems this opportunity has been wasted.”
Natasha Rattu, the Karma Nirvana executive director, said it was vital migrant victims have equal access to support via the welfare system, including access to refuge accommodation. According to Women’s Aid, just four per cent of refuges in England could accept a woman with no recourse to public funds due to their immigration status.
“Any system which continues to allow this inequality is fundamentally flawed and denies a person their basic human right,” she told Eastern Eye.
Elizabeth Jiménez-Yáñez is the campaign coordinator behind the Step Up Migrant Women (SUMW) coalition, an initiative led by the Latin American Women’s Rights Service (LAWRS) who were one of the leading organisations behind the amendments.
Jiménez-Yáñez believes the reluctance to amend the bill is down to the government’s stance on migrants and immigration. “(The amendments) don’t align with the hostile narrative and the hostile policies the government has put in place,” she told Eastern Eye.
“Over the years, we have seen the government prioritising immigration control over the safety of women. That is why so many migrant women are trapped in abusive relationships, as a result of these policies, which is sad and frustrating, because the Covid pandemic has proven there’s an urgent need to address domestic abuse and to protect all victims.”
Only four per cent of refuges in England could accept a woman with no recourse to public funds due to their immigration status
The Halo Project CEO, Yasmin Khan, said the organisation was disappointed the government had failed to recognise the changes which would ensure all migrant survivors could access services and tailored support for their needs.
“This bill has failed its historic opportunity to ensure all survivors are supported,” Khan told Eastern Eye on Tuesday (20).
Prem, Rattu and Jiménez-Yáñez all said their groups were frequently contacted by victims of immigration abuse.
In one case, Prem heard from a female victim who had been brought to the UK illegally, was forced into marriage and abused by her husband. The woman was reluctant to disclose any details on her immigration status. Although the victim was offered help by Freedom, she declined.
If the victim was sent back to their country of origin, Prem explained, they may face repercussions there. They could be ostracised by their local community for “bringing shame on the family”.
“The family may view it as she hasn’t fulfilled the requirement of the marriage,” Prem said. “There’s huge pressure on migrant women not to report (abuse) and that’s why they need this added layer of security.”
Others come to the UK on visitor visas and are told they will get a spouse visa once they are married. However, the marriage doesn’t take place, and the victim is undocumented as part of the abuse.
“Many migrant women might not understand the British system. They might not really understand the best thing they can do in order to be protected is to come on a spouse visa rather than a visitor visa,” Jiménez-Yáñez explained.
In family cases, the abuser helps to secure immigration status for the children, but not for the mother. “(Perpetrators) know it is a way to keep them trapped in an abusive relationship, to keep coercing them and controlling them,” she added.
A 2019 research report by King’s College London, LAWRS and SUMW on the experiences of migrant victims with insecure status found almost two-thirds (62 per cent) of women said their perpetrator had threatened deportation if they reported the violence. More than half were told by their abusers they would lose their visa if they reported it (54 per cent).
Karma Nirvana said it had also supported many victims who felt trapped in an abusive relationship because of their immigration status.
“We find it shameful that in the UK, a domestic abuse victim with settled immigration status has to be confirmed in order to provide full support and protection,” Rattu said. “If someone is experiencing domestic abuse, they should not be turned away on account of their immigration status.”
The Labour MP and shadow domestic violence minister, Jess Phillips, warned of the impact the lack of protection would have on migrant victims, saying that perpetrators knew they could use immigration status “as a weapon”.
“If victims can’t report, then those perpetrators remain out there,” said Phillips, who read out the names of more than 100 women killed by male violence in the House of Commons earlier this year.
Cordelia Tucker O’Sullivan, Refuge’s senior policy and public affairs manager, said the vote against the amendments was a “huge disappointment”.
“Refuge stands in solidarity with the SUMW coalition and wholeheartedly supports repeated calls for the protection of migrant women, who are so often locked out of accessing the specialist support they need,” she said. “This was a real opportunity for the government to ensure all women, regardless of where they happen to have been born, have access to the life-saving protection they need and deserve. Insecure immigration status should never be a barrier to accessing support and Refuge will continue to fight for all women to have access to the protection they need.”
In response to Eastern Eye, safeguarding minister Victoria Atkins said domestic abuse victims must be “treated as a victim first and foremost, regardless of immigration status.” “The bill will bolster our response to domestic abuse on every level to protect victims and ensure that perpetrators feel the full force of the law,” she said.
UK music industry continue to face systemic barriers that hinder progress, visibility, and career growth – despite decades of contribution and cultural influence, a new report has revealed.
The study, South Asian Soundcheck, published last Tuesday (7), surveyed 349 artists and professionals and found that while many are skilled and ambitious, structural obstacles are still holding them back.
Prepared by Lila, a charity focused on empowering south Asian artists and music professionals, the survey showed that nearly three-quarters of respondents earn some income from music, but only 28 per cent rely on it full time.
More than half struggle to access opportunities or funding, and many said they lack industry networks or knowledge about contracts and rights.
Beyond structural issues, almost half said they face stereotypes about the kind of music they should make; two in five encounter family doubts about music as a career, and one in three has experienced racial discrimination.
Although 69 per cent said there was progress in visibility, but 68 per cent still feel invisible within the industry.
Respondents sought urgent action, including mentorship and networking opportunities, stronger south Asian representation in key industry roles and fairer access to funding.
Veteran musician and composer Viram Jasani, who chaired the Asian Music Circuit and led a national enquiry into south Asian music in 1985, told Eastern Eye the findings were “disheartening”.
“I read the report and my heart sank – it feels as though nothing has changed,” he said.
“Back in 1985, we had already identified the same problems and made clear recommendations for better representation, employment and long-term support. Four decades later, we are still talking about the same issues.”
Jasani, a sitar, tabla and tambura expert, said the report focused mainly on modern genres and overlooked traditional south Asian music, which he believes is central to cultural identity.
“Since colonial times, British attitudes have not changed much,” he said. “If they can erase Indian traditional culture and create a community that lives entirely within an English cultural bubble, then they will have succeeded.”
He added that young south Asian artists were often drawn to Western contemporary music, while neglecting their own heritage.
“We are brilliant in Western genres, but that should come after we are grounded in our traditional shashtriya sangeet (classical music),” he said. “Without that foundation, we lose our sense of identity.”
Jasani also warned a lack of unity within the south Asian community continues to weaken its cultural progress.
He said, “People compete with each other while the world watches. For too long, massaging egos has taken priority over producing the best of our culture.”
According to the survey, one in three has experienced direct racial discrimination. One respondent said, “There are virtually no visible and successful south Asian artists in the mainstream – people simply do not know where to place us.”
Another added: “I want south Asian artists to be part of the collective mainstream industry, not just put on south Asian-specific stages or events.”
While the visibility of south Asian artists has improved, with more names appearing on festival line-ups and in the media, the study revealed this progress remains “surface level”.
Lila’s founder, Vikram Gudi, said the findings show progress has not yet been translated into structural inclusion.
“The data exposes what we call the progress paradox. Seventy-three per cent of the people we surveyed earn some money from music, but only 27 per cent earn enough to rely on it as a sustainable career,” he said.
“The Soundcheck gives us the evidence to enact real change and identifies three essential needs – mentorship, representation, and investment.”
Three-quarters of participants said mentorship from experienced professionals would make the biggest difference to their careers. Many stressed the importance of being guided by people who “understand how the industry works and can connect them to decision-makers”.
Nearly the same proportion called for greater south Asian representation across the music industry – not just on stage, but within executive, programming and production roles at festivals, venues, record labels and streaming services.
Dedicated funding also emerged as a priority, with many describing the current grant systems as inaccessible or ill-suited to the diverse and cross-genre work that defines south Asian creativity today.
Two in five respondents reported that family or community resistance remains a challenge, often due to the perceived instability of a music career. The report argued this scepticism is “economically logical”, when there are so few visible south Asian success stories in the mainstream.
Responding to the report, Indy Vidyalankara, member of the UK Music Diversity Taskforce and BPI Equity & Justice Advisory Group, said: “South Asian music is rich, vibrant, and hugely influential. We need south Asian representation at every level of the ecosystem, plus support and investment to match that influence.”
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.