CAMPAIGNERS have criticised a “wasted opportunity” as Tory lawmakers voted against amendments to a domestic abuse bill designed to protect migrant victims of domestic violence last week.
The Commons last Thursday (15) rejected three House of Lords-supported amendments to give migrant women with insecure immigration status equal security, excluding them from protections offered under the new bill.
Several organisations spoke to Eastern Eye following the news, expressing frustration that the amendments had been voted against by MPs.
Freedom charity founder Aneeta Prem said the opportunity to protect victims who were continuously ignored had been “wasted”. “There are groups of people already ignored, already hidden, because they are here with dubious immigration status, and have been fed a lie (by their abusers),” Prem told Eastern Eye on Monday (19). “(Victims) hide in terrible situations because they fear what the authorities will do will be much worse.
Freedom charity's Aneeta Prem said the opportunity to protect victims who were continuously ignored had been “wasted”
“Our hope was the bill would be an opportunity for a community which had been missed out in the past, and it’s a shame because it seems this opportunity has been wasted.”
Natasha Rattu, the Karma Nirvana executive director, said it was vital migrant victims have equal access to support via the welfare system, including access to refuge accommodation. According to Women’s Aid, just four per cent of refuges in England could accept a woman with no recourse to public funds due to their immigration status.
“Any system which continues to allow this inequality is fundamentally flawed and denies a person their basic human right,” she told Eastern Eye.
Elizabeth Jiménez-Yáñez is the campaign coordinator behind the Step Up Migrant Women (SUMW) coalition, an initiative led by the Latin American Women’s Rights Service (LAWRS) who were one of the leading organisations behind the amendments.
Jiménez-Yáñez believes the reluctance to amend the bill is down to the government’s stance on migrants and immigration. “(The amendments) don’t align with the hostile narrative and the hostile policies the government has put in place,” she told Eastern Eye.
“Over the years, we have seen the government prioritising immigration control over the safety of women. That is why so many migrant women are trapped in abusive relationships, as a result of these policies, which is sad and frustrating, because the Covid pandemic has proven there’s an urgent need to address domestic abuse and to protect all victims.”
Only four per cent of refuges in England could accept a woman with no recourse to public funds due to their immigration status
The Halo Project CEO, Yasmin Khan, said the organisation was disappointed the government had failed to recognise the changes which would ensure all migrant survivors could access services and tailored support for their needs.
“This bill has failed its historic opportunity to ensure all survivors are supported,” Khan told Eastern Eye on Tuesday (20).
Prem, Rattu and Jiménez-Yáñez all said their groups were frequently contacted by victims of immigration abuse.
In one case, Prem heard from a female victim who had been brought to the UK illegally, was forced into marriage and abused by her husband. The woman was reluctant to disclose any details on her immigration status. Although the victim was offered help by Freedom, she declined.
If the victim was sent back to their country of origin, Prem explained, they may face repercussions there. They could be ostracised by their local community for “bringing shame on the family”.
“The family may view it as she hasn’t fulfilled the requirement of the marriage,” Prem said. “There’s huge pressure on migrant women not to report (abuse) and that’s why they need this added layer of security.”
Others come to the UK on visitor visas and are told they will get a spouse visa once they are married. However, the marriage doesn’t take place, and the victim is undocumented as part of the abuse.
“Many migrant women might not understand the British system. They might not really understand the best thing they can do in order to be protected is to come on a spouse visa rather than a visitor visa,” Jiménez-Yáñez explained.
In family cases, the abuser helps to secure immigration status for the children, but not for the mother. “(Perpetrators) know it is a way to keep them trapped in an abusive relationship, to keep coercing them and controlling them,” she added.
A 2019 research report by King’s College London, LAWRS and SUMW on the experiences of migrant victims with insecure status found almost two-thirds (62 per cent) of women said their perpetrator had threatened deportation if they reported the violence. More than half were told by their abusers they would lose their visa if they reported it (54 per cent).
Karma Nirvana said it had also supported many victims who felt trapped in an abusive relationship because of their immigration status.
“We find it shameful that in the UK, a domestic abuse victim with settled immigration status has to be confirmed in order to provide full support and protection,” Rattu said. “If someone is experiencing domestic abuse, they should not be turned away on account of their immigration status.”
The Labour MP and shadow domestic violence minister, Jess Phillips, warned of the impact the lack of protection would have on migrant victims, saying that perpetrators knew they could use immigration status “as a weapon”.
“If victims can’t report, then those perpetrators remain out there,” said Phillips, who read out the names of more than 100 women killed by male violence in the House of Commons earlier this year.
Cordelia Tucker O’Sullivan, Refuge’s senior policy and public affairs manager, said the vote against the amendments was a “huge disappointment”.
“Refuge stands in solidarity with the SUMW coalition and wholeheartedly supports repeated calls for the protection of migrant women, who are so often locked out of accessing the specialist support they need,” she said. “This was a real opportunity for the government to ensure all women, regardless of where they happen to have been born, have access to the life-saving protection they need and deserve. Insecure immigration status should never be a barrier to accessing support and Refuge will continue to fight for all women to have access to the protection they need.”
In response to Eastern Eye, safeguarding minister Victoria Atkins said domestic abuse victims must be “treated as a victim first and foremost, regardless of immigration status.” “The bill will bolster our response to domestic abuse on every level to protect victims and ensure that perpetrators feel the full force of the law,” she said.
A FORMER West Yorkshire Police officer has been sentenced to two years and three months in prison after being convicted of misconduct in a public office.
Wasim Bashir, 55, who worked as a detective constable in Bradford District, was found guilty of one count of misconduct in a public office for forming a sexual relationship with a female victim of crime. He was sentenced at Sheffield Crown Court on Friday, 29 August.
Bashir retired from the force while under investigation but will still face misconduct proceedings.
The charge related to an incident of abuse of position for a sexual purpose, with Bashir engaging in a sexual relationship with a woman who had reported to West Yorkshire Police that she had been the victim of a sexual offence. He was involved in investigating her case.
The conviction followed an investigation by West Yorkshire Police’s Counter Corruption Unit under the direction of the Independent Office for Police Conduct. During the trial, the judge directed the jury to find Bashir not guilty of a second count of misconduct in a public office.
Detective Superintendent Natalie Dawson, Deputy Head of West Yorkshire Police’s Professional Standards Directorate, said: “For a police officer to pursue a sexual relationship with a vulnerable woman who had come forward to report being victim of a sexual offence is nothing short of abhorrent.
“I want to reassure victims of crime and the wider public that this former officer is not representative of our organisation. One of the Force’s key purposes is to protect vulnerable people, and our officers and staff work tirelessly to protect people from harm and to safeguard victims.
“Former DC Bashir has retired from the organisation, but we will still continue with misconduct proceedings with a view to him being banned from gaining any further employment in the policing profession.”
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Protesters calling for the closure of The Bell Hotel, which was housing asylum seekers, gather outside the council offices in Epping on August 8, 2025. (Photo: Getty Images)
Court of Appeal has overturned injunction blocking use of Epping hotel for asylum seekers.
Judges say human rights obligations outweigh local safety concerns.
At least 13 councils preparing legal action despite ruling.
Protests outside the Bell Hotel lead to arrests and police injuries.
MORE than a dozen councils are moving ahead with legal challenges against the use of hotels for asylum seekers despite the Home Office winning an appeal in the Court of Appeal.
Judges ruled that meeting the human rights of asylum seekers by providing accommodation outweighed local safety concerns.
The injunction was secured by Epping Forest District Council after protests following the alleged sexual assault of a 14-year-old girl by an Ethiopian asylum seeker.
The man has been charged and denies wrongdoing. A full hearing on the planning dispute over the Bell Hotel will take place in October.
At least 13 councils are preparing similar legal action, The Times reported, including Labour-run Wirral, Stevenage, Tamworth and Rushmoor. Epping Forest Council said it may appeal to the Supreme Court.
Asylum minister Dame Angela Eagle said the government remained committed to ending hotel use by 2029 and argued the appeal was needed to move migrants “in a controlled and orderly way”.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch criticised the government for prioritising “the rights of illegal immigrants above the rights of British people” and urged councils to continue legal action.
Reform leader Nigel Farage said the government had used the European Convention on Human Rights “against the people of Epping”.
Councils including Broxbourne and Spelthorne confirmed they were pressing ahead with enforcement action on planning grounds.
Protests outside the Bell Hotel on Friday led to the arrest of three men, while two police officers sustained minor injuries.
Keep ReadingShow less
India and Canada have appointed new envoys in a step to restore diplomatic ties strained since 2023. (Representational image: iStock)
INDIA and Canada on Thursday announced the appointment of new envoys to each other’s capitals, in a step aimed at restoring strained ties following the killing of a Sikh separatist in 2023.
India has named senior diplomat Dinesh K Patnaik as the next high commissioner to Ottawa, while Canada appointed Christopher Cooter as its new envoy to New Delhi.
The move comes more than two months after Indian prime minister Narendra Modi met Canadian prime minister Mark Carney on the sidelines of the G7 summit at Kananaskis in Canada.
Patnaik, a 1990-batch Indian Foreign Service officer, is currently India’s ambassador to Spain.
“He is expected to take up the assignment shortly,” the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said in a statement.
In Ottawa, Canadian Foreign Minister Anita Anand announced that Cooter will be the next high commissioner to India, succeeding Cameron MacKay.
“The appointment of a new high commissioner reflects Canada’s step-by-step approach to deepening diplomatic engagement and advancing bilateral cooperation with India,” Anand said. “This appointment is an important development toward restoring services for Canadians while strengthening the bilateral relationship to support Canada’s economy.”
A Canadian statement described the appointments as an important step towards restoring diplomatic services for citizens and businesses in both countries.
Cooter, who has 35 years of diplomatic experience, most recently served as Canada’s charge d’affaires to Israel and has earlier been high commissioner to South Africa, Namibia, Lesotho, Mauritius and Madagascar. He also worked as first secretary at the Canadian High Commission in New Delhi from 1998 to 2000.
In June, Modi and Carney had agreed to take “constructive” steps to bring stability to bilateral ties, including the early return of envoys to both capitals.
Relations between the two countries had deteriorated sharply after then prime minister Justin Trudeau alleged in 2023 that India may have had a role in the killing of Khalistani separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar.
Following this, India recalled its high commissioner and five other diplomats in October last year, while expelling an equal number of Canadian diplomats after Ottawa linked them to the case.
Carney’s victory in the parliamentary election in April has since helped initiate a reset in relations.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Security officers escort Sri Lankan former fisheries minister, Rajitha Senaratne (C), outside a court in Colombo on August 29, 2025. (Photo by ISHARA S. KODIKARA/AFP via Getty Images)
SRI LANKAN former government minister surrendered himself to a court on Friday (29) after two months on the run, the latest high profile detention in a sweeping anti-corruption crackdown.
Anti-graft units have ramped up their investigations since president Anura Kumara Dissanayake came to power in September on a promise to fight corruption.
Former fisheries minister Rajitha Senaratne, who served in the cabinet of then-president Mahinda Rajapaksa, is accused of illegally awarding a 2012 contract to a foreign firm, allegedly causing a loss to the state of $83,000 (£61,478).
Senaratne had repeatedly dodged questioning, the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption said.
High Court judge Lanka Jayaratne ordered him transferred to a lower court to face multiple cases.
Several politicians from the Rajapaksa administration, as well as family members, are either in jail or on bail pending corruption investigations.
Former president Ranil Wickremesinghe was arrested last week on a charge of misusing $55,000 (£40,738) of government funds for a private stopover in Britain.
Wickremesinghe, 76, who was granted bail on Tuesday (26), insisted the stopover was part of his official duties.
Under Dissanayake, two former senior ministers have been jailed for up to 25 years for corruption.
The police chief has been impeached, after he was accused of running a criminal network that supported politicians, and the prisons chief was jailed for corruption.
The head of immigration -- arrested just before Dissanayake took power -- remains in detention on a charge of contempt of court.
(AFP)
Keep ReadingShow less
Protesters from the group Save Our Future & Our Kids Future demonstrate against uncontrolled immigration outside the Cladhan Hotel on August 16, 2025 in Falkirk, Scotland. (Photo: Getty Images)
UK appeals court overturns ruling blocking hotel use for asylum seekers
Judges call earlier High Court decision “seriously flawed”
138 asylum seekers will not need to be relocated by September 12
Full hearing scheduled at the Court of Appeal in October
A UK appeals court has overturned a lower court order that had temporarily blocked the use of a hotel in Epping, northeast of London, to house asylum seekers.
A three-judge panel said the High Court ruling that set a September 12 deadline to move migrants from the Bell Hotel contained "a number of errors".
The case followed protests outside the hotel after a resident was charged with sexually assaulting a local girl. Demonstrations have continued for weeks and at times turned violent, triggering debate on immigration policy.
The Court of Appeal said the earlier ruling was "seriously flawed in principle" and could act as an "impetus or incentive for further protests". It added that it failed to consider the "obvious consequence that the closure of one site means capacity needs to be identified elsewhere in the system".
The government will now not be required to relocate 138 asylum seekers from the hotel by September 12. The decision also weakens local efforts to challenge the use of other hotels to house asylum seekers.
The Home Office is legally required under a 1999 law to house "all destitute asylum seekers whilst their asylum claims are being decided".
The case will return for a full hearing at the Court of Appeal in October. Both the Home Office and the hotel’s owner, Somani Hotels, are opposing Epping Forest District Council’s bid to prevent the hotel being used for asylum accommodation.
The council argued that the hotel posed a public safety risk and that its use breached planning rules.
The hotel became the focus of national attention after resident Hadush Kebatu was accused of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. He has denied the charges, which include sexual assault, attempted sexual assault, and harassment without violence. His trial began this week.
Protests in Epping have since spread to other parts of Britain, as small boat arrivals across the Channel continue.