Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Johnny Depp was ‘real’, Amber Heard cried ‘crocodile tears’, says defamation trial juror

The jury members in the Amber Heard-Johnny Depp defamation trial unanimously ruled in Johnny’s favour.

Johnny Depp was ‘real’, Amber Heard cried ‘crocodile tears’, says defamation trial juror

A juror in the widely reported Amber Heard-Johnny Depp defamation has said that Johnny Depp was ‘real’ and ‘believable’, while Amber shed ‘crocodile tears’ during the proceedings.

There was a total of seven members on the jury in the defamation trial. During an interview with Good Morning America, one of the jurors said, “The crying, the facial expressions that she had, the staring at the jury. All of us were very uncomfortable. She would answer one question and she would be crying, and two seconds later she would turn ice cold. Some of us used the expression ‘crocodile tears.’”


The jurors found Johnny Depp more real and believable. “A lot of the jury felt what he was saying, at the end of the day, was more believable. He just seemed a little more real in terms of how he was responding to questions. His emotional state was very stable throughout,” he said.

The jury members in the Amber Heard-Johnny Depp defamation trial unanimously ruled in Johnny's favour.

For the uninitiated, Johnny sued his ex-wife Amber for defamation over an op-ed published in the Washington Post in 2018, where she called herself a domestic abuse survivor. However, she did not name Johnny Depp.

Meanwhile, Amber admitted that she fears her ex-husband Johnny Depp will sue her again during an interview with Savannah Guthrie. “I took for granted what I assumed was my right to speak. I am scared that, no matter what I do, no matter what I say or how I say it, every step that I take will present another opportunity for silencing, which I guess is what a defamation lawsuit is meant to do it is meant to take your voice,” said Amber.

More For You

Kerala actress assault case

Inside the Kerala actress assault case and the reckoning it triggered in Malayalam cinema

AI Generated

The Kerala actress assault case explained: How it is changing industry culture in Malayalam cinema

Highlights:

  • February 2017: Actress abducted and sexually assaulted; case reported the next day.
  • Legal journey: Trial ran nearly nine years, with witnesses turning hostile and evidence disputes.
  • Verdict: Six accused convicted; actor Dileep acquitted of conspiracy in December 2025.
  • Industry impact: Led to WCC, Hema Committee report, and exposure of systemic harassment.
  • Aftermath: Protests, public backlash, and survivor’s statement questioning justice and equality.

You arrive in Kochi, and it feels like the sea air makes everything slightly sharper; faces in the city look purposeful, a film poster peels at the corner of a wall. In a city that has cradled a thriving film industry for decades, a single crime on the night of 17 February 2017 ruptured the ordinary: an abduction, a recorded sexual assault and a survivor who reported it the next day. What happened next is every woman’s unspoken nightmare, weaponised into brutal reality. It was a public unpeeling of an industry’s power structures, a slow-motion fight over evidence and testimony, and a national debate about how institutions protect (or fail) women.

For over eight years, her fight for justice became a mirror held up to an entire industry and a society. It was a journey from the dark confines of that car to the glaring lights of a courtroom, from being a silenced victim to becoming a defiant survivor whose voice sparked a revolution. This is not just the story of a crime. It is the story of what happens when one woman says, "Enough," and the tremors that follow.

Keep ReadingShow less