Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

India’s war contribution to al­lied victory

By Amit Roy

THE 75th anniversary of VE day last week came and went without much acknowledgement of the Indian contribution to al­lied victory.


The Indian-origin his­torian Kusoom Vadgama, who has long tried to highlight the role played by Indian soldiers, said: “I am glued to the media, but no one has men­tioned the contribution from India – Pakistan in­cluded. I have no words to mention this lack of gratitude. One would think that the Indian sol­diers did not join the armed forces. What an insult to India. It is al­ways assumed that Brit­ain alone won the war.”

For the record, a total of 2.5 million Indian sol­diers enlisted for Britain in the Second World War. They served in the North African campaign against the Germans; in Eritrea and Abyssinia against the Italians; in West Asia, Iran and Iraq; in the Far East; in Italy, where they took part in some of the bloodiest fighting at the siege of Monte Cassino and elsewhere.

By the end of the war, 36,092 Indians were killed or missing, 64,350 were wounded and 79,489 taken prisoner.

In her VE Day address, the Queen recalled the speech made by George VI as she said: “As I now reflect on my father’s words and the joyous cel­ebrations, which some of us experienced first-hand, I am thankful for the strength and courage that the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth and all our allies displayed.”

An Indian origin peer said the sacrifices of Indi­an soldiers in the Second World War was “not com­pletely forgotten but a constant effort is required to properly recognise ‘the gift of India’ and to ‘re­member the blood of thy martyred sons’ ”.

He drew my attention to a report in a local pa­per in Windsor about a 96-year-old Indian veter­an, Sergeant Mohammad Hussain, who “trained in gunnery, wireless and driving in the Armoured Corps before joining the 6th Duke of Connaught’s Own Lancers as the ma­chine gunner on an ar­moured car, fighting in It­aly at the ferocious Battle of Monte Cassino and taking a number of Ger­man prisoners”.

The paper reported: “He came to the UK in 1960 because he wanted his son to have a British edu­cation and has lived in Windsor for 23 years. He remembers with amuse­ment getting a job as a security guard – especial­ly when he put on his uniform. ‘I heard some­one say, ‘Bloody blackie in a British uniform.’”

Perhaps his detractor should not be blamed too much, since the Indian war contribution is not part of the national nar­rative nor included in the history syllabus at school. One way to tell the story would be through films such as The Darkest Hour.

The question now is whether the sacrifice of Asian doctors and nurses in the current pandemic be remembered 75 years from now.

More For You

Shabana Mahmood

Home secretary Shabana Mahmood was born in Britain of parents who came from Mirpur. (Photo: Getty Images)

Politics of grooming gangs

Sir Keir Starmer was never keen on an inquiry specifically on Pakistani grooming gangs. The prime minister wants to be protective of the wider Pakistani community in the UK. The last thing he wants is an Islamophobic report which states that for cultural and religious reasons, Muslim Pakistan men have been targeting vulnerable white children and young women. But this is precisely the conclusion that some of the survivors and other groups want.

The Labour leadership was already in trouble with some Pakistani voters who felt it was not sufficiently critical of Israel’s military approach in the Gaza war. Starmer would not want to alienate them further with a report that picks out only Pakistanis when it comes to sexual abuse. It would be preferable to have a report that acknowledges that while there has been an historic problem with Pakistani grooming gangs in places such as Rotherham and Rochdale, white men are involved, too, in bigger numbers across the UK as a whole.

Keep ReadingShow less