Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Female barrister suspended and fined for saying trial judge was talking 'absolute rubbish'

Jacqueline Vallejo was disrespectful towards senior crown court judge Kaly Kaul: Tribunal

Female barrister suspended and fined for saying trial judge was talking 'absolute rubbish'

A “belligerent” barrister who created a “toxic atmosphere in court” has been suspended from practice for four months.

According to a Bar disciplinary tribunal judgment last week, Jacqueline Vallejo’s behaviour towards senior crown court judge Kaly Kaul was “rude and unprofessional”.

Vallejo, 50, who was “belligerent towards court” and “unduly argumentative” was disrespectful towards Kaul, the ruling said, adding that she adopted an “unhelpful tone, attitude and approach”.

It took note of an instance where the criminal law specialist called the judge’s summary of evidence for the jury “absolute rubbish”, The Times reported.

The charge of professional misconduct was brought by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) which is responsible for setting standards of conduct for barristers.

The tribunal found that Vallejo, a UK-Spanish dual citizen, had failed to observe her duty to the court in the administration of justice and fined her £2,000.

“It is quite clear to us that the learned judge . . . in a reasoned and balanced manner regularly asked Miss Vallejo to control what she was saying in court. But Miss Vallejo for whatever reasons ignored those requests and instead carried on,” the ruling which is open to appeal, said.

“From what we can see and have heard from the transcript, the judge tried to control it, but Miss Vallejo was uncontrollable.”

A BSB spokesperson said, “hearings can often be stressful and challenging and barristers must be able to defend their clients robustly. However, the conduct of the barrister in this case went beyond robustness and interfered with the administration of justice. The seriousness of this behaviour is reflected in the tribunal’s sanction of suspension from practice.”

Vallejo’s barrister Ali Naseem Bajwa QC said she had been going through health problems and regretted her behaviour.

More For You

Epstein

Tartaglione said he found the note after Epstein’s failed suicide attempt in July 2019, weeks before his death in jail

Getty Images

Epstein 'suicide note' unsealed which claims investigators found 'nothing' against him

Highlights

  • A federal judge unsealed a purported suicide note written by Jeffrey Epstein.
  • The unsigned note was found by former cellmate Nicholas Tartaglione after a failed suicide attempt in July 2019.
  • The New York City medical examiner ruled Epstein's death a suicide, though conspiracy theories persist.
A federal judge unsealed an alleged suicide note written by Jeffrey Epstein on Wednesday, marking the first time the document has been made public.
The note was released after the New York Times petitioned the court in White Plains, New York, following a story the publication ran detailing the document's existence.

The handwritten note, which carries no signature, reads in part: "They investigated me for months — FOUND NOTHING!!! It is a treat to be able to choose one's time to say goodbye."

The Guardian, which reported on the unsealing, has not verified whether the letter was written by Epstein. The justice department did not return its request for comment.

Keep ReadingShow less