Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Ambedkar Museum to remain safe in London

By Amit Roy

INDIA’S prime minister Narendra Modi owes Boris Johnson a favour, after his British counterpart stepped in and saved the Ambedkar Museum in London from possible closure in the larger interests of UK-India relations.


“I was pleased to grant planning permission for a museum in London to Dr Ambedkar – one of the founding fathers of modern India and an important figure to many British-Indians,” tweeted Robert Jenrick, secretary of state for housing, communities and local government.

“We are very happy,” I was told by Gautam Chakravarty, secretary of the Federation of Ambedkarites and Buddhist Organisations UK, who said there would be joyous celebrations of Ambedkar’s 129th birth anniversary on April 14.

Asked whether he thought Delhi had leaned on the British government, he replied: “We think justice has been done. Here is a man who fought for justice and equality all his life and these are universal values, still relevant after 60 years.”

Camden Council had threatened to return the property to “residential use” after finding that the museum was “set up illegally without planning permission”.

The dispute had gone to an inspector’s inquiry, when Jenrick “recovered the appeal”.

Camden Council told me last week: “While we are disappointed that the Planning Inspectorate has ruled against the council’s original decision..., we do accept and respect the decision, given the additional evidence ... regarding Dr Ambedkar, who was a major figure in Indian and British history and his association with this property.”

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Small boats

By far the biggest losers from this Labour government’s choices are recently recognised refugees.

Getty Images

Hidden refugee U-turn means settlement changes fail the cohesion test

Immigration has been the most polarising issue of our age. Yet it was settlement policy - the immigration of the recent past – that caused the first public rifts in Andy Burnham’s government. The prime minister inherited a stand-off: how far was it fair to change the rules for those who had come to Britain, in record numbers, over the past five years?

No flagship government policy for decades has changed so much after consultation. Cue fierce political arguments about why. Right-wing opposition parties depicted home secretary Shabana Mahmood as the only Labour voice willing to get a grip – before being forced to back down by soft-headed pro-migration colleagues. The centre-left critique was that the government had picked a damaging fight with its own side when it would never be able to satisfy hardline demands to send the so-called ‘Boriswave’ home.

Keep ReadingShow less