Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Ambedkar Museum to remain safe in London

By Amit Roy

INDIA’S prime minister Narendra Modi owes Boris Johnson a favour, after his British counterpart stepped in and saved the Ambedkar Museum in London from possible closure in the larger interests of UK-India relations.


“I was pleased to grant planning permission for a museum in London to Dr Ambedkar – one of the founding fathers of modern India and an important figure to many British-Indians,” tweeted Robert Jenrick, secretary of state for housing, communities and local government.

“We are very happy,” I was told by Gautam Chakravarty, secretary of the Federation of Ambedkarites and Buddhist Organisations UK, who said there would be joyous celebrations of Ambedkar’s 129th birth anniversary on April 14.

Asked whether he thought Delhi had leaned on the British government, he replied: “We think justice has been done. Here is a man who fought for justice and equality all his life and these are universal values, still relevant after 60 years.”

Camden Council had threatened to return the property to “residential use” after finding that the museum was “set up illegally without planning permission”.

The dispute had gone to an inspector’s inquiry, when Jenrick “recovered the appeal”.

Camden Council told me last week: “While we are disappointed that the Planning Inspectorate has ruled against the council’s original decision..., we do accept and respect the decision, given the additional evidence ... regarding Dr Ambedkar, who was a major figure in Indian and British history and his association with this property.”

More For You

Why did media ignore Starmer’s India success?

A billboard featuring Narendra Modi and Sir Keir Starmer welcomes the British leader along a street in Mumbai

Why did media ignore Starmer’s India success?

THERE has been very little substantive coverage of Sir Keir Starmer’s first visit to India as prime minister in the British press.

One paper ignored the visit altogether, preferring to devote three pages to something it considered far more important – David and Victoria Beckham. There was also the regular instalment of just how awful Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, is, especially when compared to Kate, the Princess of Wales. One paper did have a story, but it was about how Starmer would not liberalise visas for India.

Keep ReadingShow less