Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

UN human rights council adopts resolution to investigate Sri Lanka's civil war crimes

UN human rights council adopted a resolution on Tuesday (23), spearheaded by Britain, to investigate war crimes during Sri Lanka's civil war against separatist Tamil Tigers.

The chief of the Geneva-based rights council, Michelle Bachelet's office will now have new staff, powers and a £2.0 million budget to look at Sri Lanka's war crimes.


The vote was 22 in favour, with 11 against including China and Pakistan, and 14 abstentions including India.

The civil war ended in 2009 after the defeat of the rebels, who fought for a separate state for the Tamil minority. According to the United Nations figures, the 26-year conflict recorded 80,000-100,000 deaths.

"It is hugely significant for victims. It really is a recognition that at the domestic level, processes have failed and there is no real hope that victims will access justice," Yasmin Sooka, a rights lawyer involved in a civil prosecution against Sri Lanka's current president Gotabaya Rajapaksa for alleged war crimes, told Reuters.

Rajapaksa, who served as Sri Lanka's wartime defence chief, has maintained his innocence, and the case was withdrawn after he attained immunity on becoming president in 2019.

Sri Lanka foreign minister Dinesh Gunawardena told a press conference in Colombo on Tuesday (23) that the resolution lacked authority and cannot be implemented without the consent of the country concerned.

"It is a waste of money. Highly uncalled for," Gunawardena told at a hurriedly organised press conference in Colombo.

"Without the consent and acceptance of the country concerned, it cannot be implemented."

The money would be better spent on providing "housing for the entire population in the Jaffna peninsula," he said, referring to the heartland of minority Tamils in the war-battered region.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Court rules

A landmark VAT ruling could reshape the tax landscape for ride-hailing operators in Britain

iStock

Court rules Bolt must pay VAT on full fares weakening Uber's similar case

  • HMRC has won a £190m tax dispute against Bolt.
  • Court rejects Bolt's attempt to apply a travel industry VAT scheme.
  • The ruling could influence Uber's separate £1.4bn tax case.

Britain's tax authority has secured a significant victory in a long-running VAT dispute with ride-hailing company Bolt, a ruling that could have far-reaching consequences for Uber and other app-based transport operators.

The Court of Appeal sided with HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) in a case worth around £190 million, overturning two earlier tribunal decisions that had favoured Bolt. The dispute centred on how VAT should be applied to fares booked through ride-hailing platforms, an issue that has become increasingly important as companies such as Bolt and Uber expand their presence in the UK market.

Keep ReadingShow less