Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Braverman not in favour of 'more humane' UN-backed asylum scheme

The home secretary is actively pursuing an extensive expansion of the Home Office’s detention infrastructure, a move estimated to necessitate billions in funding

Braverman not in favour of 'more humane' UN-backed asylum scheme

Home secretary Suella Braverman is refraining from endorsing an asylum-support initiative backed by the UN, despite its being labelled a "more humane" approach.

The initiative, funded by the Home Office, has gained recognition for its achievements in Bedfordshire, where it substantially curtailed expenses linked to housing refugees and migrants compared to detention.


This was accomplished through the provision of housing, alongside legal and welfare assistance.

Nevertheless, according to experts, the home secretary is actively pursuing an extensive expansion of the Home Office's detention infrastructure, a move estimated to necessitate billions in funding.

Braverman has unveiled intentions to amplify immigration-detention capacity, including the repurposing of disused RAF bases and barges, The Guardian reported.

The Bibby Stockholm barge, initially designed to accommodate 500 asylum seekers, now sits vacant due to the detection of legionella bacteria on board.

Presently, the Home Office is expending over £5 million each day to lodge asylum seekers in hotels.

Concurrently, the rollout of the illegal migration act is predicted to result in the detention of "tens of thousands" of refugees, with potential costs exceeding £3 billion over the upcoming two years as estimated by internal government assessments.

A forthcoming report this week from the IPPR thinktank is anticipated to caution that the law will contribute to the ongoing turmoil.

The anticipated assessment by the UNHCR (the refugee agency that helps the government improve its asylum system) regarding the Home Office-sponsored pilot is expected to commend the Bedfordshire initiative for its more compassionate treatment of refugees and migrants, standing in contrast to the Home Office's portrayal of an invasion and menacing migrants.

Critics speculate that this facet of the scheme's success has contributed to its apparent abandonment by the Home Office, which is legally tasked with detaining and deporting individuals entering the UK unlawfully.

Insiders familiar with the scheme's particulars contend that "The findings fly in the face of the illegal migration act. They certainly contradict the Home Office narrative and rhetoric of 'invasion' and 'scary migrants.'"

Following her reappointment as Home Secretary by Rishi Sunak, Braverman labelled refugees and migrants crossing the Channel as "the invasion on our southern coast."

Located in Bedford, the King's Arm Project has provided support to 75 vulnerable migrants representing 23 nationalities since August 2020.

This endeavour has extended legal advice, clothing, mental health aid, English language instruction, and GP registration while facilitating integration into the community.

The pilot demonstrated greater cost-effectiveness compared to detention and yielded improved outcomes, including facilitating settled status.

Less than half of those held in immigration detention centres ultimately face deportation.

But despite the positive results observed during the pilot, the Home Office has not clarified why the initiative was not scaled up following its initial trial.

This is not the first instance of an "alternative to detention" initiative being abandoned by the Home Office.

In 2021, a programme in Newcastle designed to support vulnerable women in the community as opposed to detention was terminated by the Home Office.

Similarly, in 2019, former immigration minister Caroline Nokes aimed to reform the system to aid "support vulnerable women outside detention," yet the Home Office's approach to asylum seekers has grown more rigid in subsequent years.

A spokesperson for the Home Office noted that the existing asylum system is under significant pressure and the associated costs are deemed unacceptable.

The spokesperson underscored the government's emphasis on curbing illegal immigration at its source and expressed ongoing efforts to explore avenues for reducing detention expenses.

Additionally, the spokesperson said the introduction of the illegal migration bill aims to ensure the detention and expeditious removal of individuals arriving in the UK unlawfully.

More For You

London tourist levy

The capital recorded 89 m overnight stays in 2024

iStock

London to introduce tourist levy that could raise £240 million a year

Kumail Jaffer

Highlights

  • Government expected to give London powers to bring in a tourist levy on overnight stays.
  • GLA study says a £1 fee could raise £91m, a 5 per cent charge could generate £240m annually.
  • Research suggests London would not see a major fall in visitor numbers if levy introduced.
The mayor of London has welcomed reports that he will soon be allowed to introduce a tourist levy on overnight visitors, with new analysis outlining how a charge could work in the capital.
Early estimates suggest a London levy could raise as much as £240 m every year. The capital recorded 89 m overnight stays in 2024.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to give Sadiq Khan and other English city leaders the power to impose such a levy through the upcoming English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill. London currently cannot set its own tourist tax, making England the only G7 nation where national government blocks local authorities from doing so.

A spokesperson for the mayor said City Hall supported the idea in principle, adding “The Mayor has been clear that a modest tourist levy, similar to other international cities, would boost our economy, deliver growth and help cement London’s reputation as a global tourism and business destination.”

Keep ReadingShow less