Labour will focus on legal migration and tackle worker inactivity: Anneliese Dodds
In its election manifesto launched last month, Labour promised to end the reliance on migrant workers
By Sarwar AlamJul 02, 2024
A future Labour government would have a greater focus on legal migration while also tackling inactivity among British workers in order to reduce net migration to the UK, the party’s chair, Anneliese Dodds, said at an election debate hosted by Eastern Eye in London on Monday (1).
In its election manifesto launched last month, Labour promised to end the reliance on migrant workers and said the party will pass a new law to force different parts of the government to draw up skills improvement plans in high-migration sectors.
Anneliese Dodds
Dodds stressed this would make a bigger impact on net migration than the current Conservative government’s plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda - which she described as “unethical” and argued would “simply not work”.
“What has happened over recent years is a huge amount of the discussion in the UK is around unregulated migration, it hasn't focused on legal migration, regulated migration,” said Dodds, who is also the shadow secretary of state for women and equalities.
She was taking part in a panel discussion along with the Conservative Party’s Andrew Boff, chair of the London Assembly, and Lord Richard Newby, leader of the Liberal Democrats in the House of Lords.
Dodds said, “We’ve seen a very significant increase in work visas, particularly in health and social care visas - up by about 150 per cent over last year.
“These people are coming to our country and making a huge contribution. They're the people who are staffing our social care homes, who are working in our NHS. That's happening at a time when levels of economic inactivity amongst the population already here has been going up, so there's something that is not working.
“Labour have said we need to have a proper workforce strategy. We need to end the situation where some employers can employ people from other countries and actually pay them less and be legally able to do that within our system.
“We need to make social care, in particular, is a job you can see progression in, where you can bring up a family - at the moment you just can't make ends meet. That's why we set up plans for fair pay agreement.
“There are things we can and should be doing. We've not seen action being taken over recent years, and Labour would be acting on those issues.”
Members of the Asian community were in audience at 55, Broadway, above St James’s Park station in central London at the debate, which was moderated by Eastern Eye’s editor at large, Barnie Choudhury.
Lib Dems leader Lord Newby argued for a rise in minimum hourly pay for sectors that were heavily reliant on overseas workers.
Home Office data shows the number of visas issued to social care workers, excluding dependants, reached a record 106,000 in 2023.
Health and care visas as a whole (also including doctors and nurses) now make up 75 per cent of all long-term skilled worker visa grants.
Newby said, “As far as social care is concerned, what we've said is that we should be paying people as a minimum in social care £2 an hour more than the living wage, because otherwise people are going to go and do less stressful jobs, working in supermarkets and elsewhere.
“It's no point saying we should double the wages of everybody, because that's not going to work. That's going to put people out of business. But what we can do is have a decent, basic living wage.”
Andrew Boff
Boff said while immigration and diversity were a “major strength” in the capital, he believed the UK’s economy isn’t coping with the current levels of legal immigration.
Net migration to the UK fell ten per cent last year after hitting a record high in 2022.
The number – the difference between the number of people arriving in the UK and leaving – was 685,000 in the year to December 2023, said the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
However, despite the fall, net migration is more than three times higher than at the 2019 election when the Conservatives promised to cut overall numbers in their manifesto.
“We must value immigrants, and the best thing to do if you see an immigrant in the street is to go up to them and say, welcome and thank you for being here,” said Boff.
“However, what the people of this country are seeing is that we've got an economy that's not coping with the level of immigration.
“We're not alone on that, countries throughout Europe are struggling with this.
“We've introduced a points-based system that tries to make it as fair as possible for people to come to the UK to work. But the most important thing is we've got to reject the narrative put by some parties, like Reform, is that there is something wrong with immigrants or wrong with immigration – we ne need to reject that 100 per cent.”
Boff was questioned about members of his own party making divisive comments about immigrants, such as former home secretary Suella Braverman claiming that a” plane taking off to Rwanda, that's my dream, it's my obsession”.
“You shouldn't be demonising immigrants. You shouldn't dream of making people suffer. For me, that's called a nightmare,” responded Boff.
“But we have to have a system that is fair, a system that that takes into account the capacity of the country to be able to accommodate the immigrants who want to come here.”
With most polls showing Labour is on course to form the new government, Dodds said the party was determined to be open about how they will bring economic stability to the UK.
AMG's Kalpesh Solanki (far left) and Shailesh Solanki (far right) with Tony Matharu and the panelists
The Conservatives have claimed Labour has not been upfront with the public about its tax plans, with prime minister Rishi Sunak saying, “Labour would bankrupt people in every generation.”
Boff reiterated the thoughts of Sunak, saying “they (Labour) are going to tax you more to fund their schemes - history doesn't tell you any different”.
Dodds responded: “Labour would put in a fiscal lock that would mean we will never again have a budget being presented that had not been assessed by the Office for Budget Responsibility beforehand - we'd always have that transparency and that assessment.
“Our fiscal rules are also around, ensuring we have day to day spending being covered by tax receipts, that we don't end up in a situation where the markets believe there's going to be heavy indebtedness because of unfunded commitments.
“We've had a situation previously where there have been unfunded promises made by government, where they've not been clear about where the money is going to come from to pay for things, and that's led to economic instability that's impacted on everyone.
Lord Richard Newby
“Labour will not do that. We will always be clear about how we'll pay for our commitments.
“We have said we will remove that VAT exemption for private schools. We'll do it because we have to be clear about how we will improve schooling for the 93 per cent of children in our country who don't attend private schools.”
Newby said small businesses had faced “terrible problems” as a result of “chronic instability in recent years”.
Labour promised to overhaul the business rates system to help revitalise the high street if elected on Thursday (4).
The party has not specified what will replace the current business rates system, but said reforms would level the playing field for high street firms against online rivals.
Dodds said: “I've had many discussions with entrepreneurs, and I know they are concerned and want to understand Labour's plans around business taxation, particularly corporation tax. And (shadow chancellor) Rachel Reeves set that out very clearly (that there will be no increase to corporation tax), quite a long time ago to try and provide that certainty and economic stability.”
Vapers in the UK have been warned not to stockpile single-use e-cigarettes ahead of a nationwide ban coming into effect this Sunday, as the devices pose a significant fire hazard if not stored correctly.
The Local Government Association (LGA) issued the warning in response to concerns that many consumers are hoarding disposable vapes before the ban begins. Under the new regulations, retailers will be prohibited from selling single-use vapes from Sunday, and businesses that fail to comply face penalties.
David Fothergill, chair of the LGA’s community wellbeing board, cautioned both consumers and retailers, stating: “We want to remind businesses to ensure all remaining stocks of disposable vapes are sold, and that they only purchase products complying with the new regulations.
“If businesses have any single-use vapes in their possession after Sunday, they will not be able to sell them to shoppers and must ensure they are stored and disposed of safely. We would also urge caution to anyone stockpiling disposable vapes. Failing to store disposable vapes correctly could cost lives, given the significant fire risk they pose.”
The disposable vapes ban has been introduced to address the sharp rise in youth vaping and the growing environmental issues linked to improper disposal. Many of the products contain lithium-ion batteries, which, if crushed or exposed to heat, can ignite and cause fires.
Research by online nicotine retailer Haypp revealed that 82% of disposable vape users are considering stockpiling their preferred products before the ban takes effect.
Environmental concerns have also been cited as a key factor behind the ban. According to Material Focus, a non-profit dedicated to improving electrical recycling in the UK, an estimated five million disposable vapes were being thrown away incorrectly each week in 2024. This figure is nearly four times higher than in 2023.
Scott Butler, executive director of Material Focus, highlighted the risks: “Thirteen vapes every second are being incorrectly disposed of, and that’s a huge environmental pollution problem. The liquid in many vape batteries is toxic and could run into waterways, as well as harm animals. It’s also a significant fire risk because lithium batteries are known to cause fires when crushed with general waste.”
He added: “Vapes are a huge environmental pollution problem, so we hope the ban goes some way to reducing waste.”
Disposable vapes are currently the most commonly used devices among underage users. According to Action on Smoking and Health (ASH), more than 20% of UK children have tried vaping. Campaigners say the sweet flavours and brightly coloured packaging of many disposable vapes appeal particularly to younger consumers.
Under the incoming regulations, only vapes that are rechargeable, refillable and fitted with replaceable coils will be permitted for sale in the UK.
Despite the government's move, experts have raised concerns that the vaping industry may already be preparing to sidestep the rules. There are fears that cheap imports, especially from China, may enter the UK market through unregulated channels, especially following new US tariffs on Chinese goods.
Hazel Cheeseman, deputy chief executive of ASH, commented: “There’s already a sizeable illegal market. Whether the disposable vapes ban makes that risk greater depends on how quickly legitimate retailers can provide products that meet users’ needs. People don’t necessarily want to go looking for illegal products if they can buy legal ones in their local shop or supermarket.”
Enforcement of the ban is expected to be a major challenge, particularly at UK borders. Kate Pike, lead officer for vaping at the Chartered Trading Standards Institute, said additional funding had been allocated for customs inspections, but called for stronger import controls to stop illegal vapes from entering the country.
“We have extra funding to do more at ports and borders,” she said. “From our point of view, it’s important, because obviously it makes a big difference if we can stop [illegal vapes entering the country].”
Retailers have been instructed to clear their stock of single-use e-cigarettes and dispose of unsold products safely in compliance with environmental and fire safety regulations. With the disposable vapes ban imminent, authorities are urging consumers not to hoard the soon-to-be-banned products, both for safety and to support the policy’s intended public health and environmental benefits.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
IndiGo, a USD 10 billion-revenue company, operates over 2,300 flights daily with a fleet of more than 430 aircraft. (Photo: Reuters)
INDIGO will begin direct flights to 10 international destinations, including London and Athens, in the current financial year, CEO Pieter Elbers said on Friday.
Other destinations include Amsterdam (the Netherlands), Manchester (the UK), Copenhagen (Denmark), Siem Reap (Cambodia) and four cities in Central Asia.
“There is an enormous opportunity in Indian aviation where rising demand is supported by infrastructure expansion,” Elbers said at a briefing in the national capital.
IndiGo will start direct flights from Mumbai to Manchester and Amsterdam using leased Boeing 787-9 aircraft in July. The services to Manchester will also mark the airline’s long-haul debut.
IndiGo, a USD 10 billion-revenue company, operates over 2,300 flights daily with a fleet of more than 430 aircraft. It flies to more than 90 domestic and 40 international destinations.
With the airline expanding international operations, Elbers said there is an enormous opportunity to build India as a great place for connecting flights, highlighting the country’s potential to become an international hub.
“Currently, Indian carriers account for 45 per cent of India’s international traffic while the remaining 55 per cent is served by overseas airlines,” Elbers said.
He added that IndiGo has the highest number of female pilots at around 15 per cent of the total pilot strength.
IndiGo will also host the 81st Annual General Meeting of the International Air Transport Association (IATA) in the national capital in June. The AGM is being held in India after 42 years.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
'It was getting very bad. It was getting very nasty. They are both nuclear powers,' Trump said. (Photo: Getty Images)
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump has said that the “deal” he is most proud of is his effort to stop a “potentially a nuclear war” between India and Pakistan through trade instead of through “bullets.”
In recent weeks, Trump has repeatedly claimed that he told India and Pakistan that the US would stop trade with both countries if they did not stop the conflict.
India on Thursday said that trade was not discussed at all in talks between Indian and American leaders during the military clashes with Pakistan, rejecting Washington’s claims that trade stopped the confrontation.
Trump on Friday said, “I think the deal I’m most proud of is the fact that we’re dealing with India, we’re dealing with Pakistan and we were able to stop potentially a nuclear war through trade as opposed through bullets. Normally they do it through bullets. We do it through trade. So I’m very proud of that. Nobody talks about it but we had a very nasty potential war going on between Pakistan and India. And now, if you look, they’re doing fine,” Trump told reporters.
“It was getting very bad. It was getting very nasty. They are both nuclear powers,” he said.
Trump said Pakistani representatives are coming to Washington next week.
“India, as you know, we’re very close to making a deal with India,” Trump told reporters at Joint Base Andrews after departing Air Force One. “I wouldn’t have any interest in making a deal with either if they were going to be at war with each other. I would not and I’ll let them know,” Trump said.
This was the second time in a day that Trump repeated his claim that his administration stopped India and Pakistan from fighting.
“We stopped India and Pakistan from fighting. I believe that could have turned out into a nuclear disaster,” Trump said during remarks in the Oval Office Friday afternoon in a press conference with billionaire Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who left the Trump administration after helming the Department of Government Efficiency.
Trump added that he wants to thank the “leaders of India, the leaders of Pakistan, and I want to thank my people also. We talked trade and we said ‘We can’t trade with people that are shooting at each other and potentially using nuclear weapons’.”
Trump said that leaders in India and Pakistan are “great leaders” and “they understood, and they agreed, and that all stopped.”
“We are stopping others from fighting also because ultimately, we can fight better than anybody. We have the greatest military in the world. We have the greatest leaders in the world,” Trump said.
India has been maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached after direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries.
An all-party delegation of Indian parliamentarians, led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, will arrive in Washington DC around June 3 after completing their visit to Guyana, Panama, Colombia, and Brazil conveying India’s resolve against terrorism and emphasising Pakistan’s links to terrorism.
The multi-party delegations from India to different countries have been underlining that the recent conflict with Pakistan was triggered by the Pahalgam terror attack and not Operation Sindoor as alleged by Islamabad.
The retaliatory Operation Sindoor launched by India targeted terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
About two weeks after the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir in which 26 civilians were killed, India launched Operation Sindoor targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
India and Pakistan reached an understanding on May 10 to end the conflict after four days of cross-border drone and missile strikes.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Estimates say that 85% of the UK marshes have been lost since the mid 19th century
The UK’s saltmarshes are vital allies in protecting climate-warming greenhouse gases stored in the soil, according to a report from the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) in partnership with insurance company Aviva.
These habitats provide a refuge for wildlife, capture carbon, and help manage floods naturally by slowing the movement of seawater inland.
Often overlooked, saltmarshes are the unsung heroes in the fight against climate change, yet most have been lost to agriculture.
The report urges the government to add saltmarshes to the official UK greenhouse gas inventory to better track how much carbon is absorbed and emitted annually. WWF and Aviva argue that such inclusion would contribute to national reporting, improve funding access, and strengthen policies for the protection and restoration of these habitats.
Described as nature’s ‘carbon stores’, saltmarshes are increasingly at risk due to rising sea levels, the latest research warns.
They absorb and release significant amounts of greenhouse gases, with seasonal fluctuations—absorbing more in spring and summer than in autumn and winter.
Formal recognition is essential for the effective restoration and protection of these sites.
Scientists from the UK and WWF have installed solar-powered monitoring equipment at Hesketh Out Marsh, a restored saltmarsh in North-West England managed by the RSPB. This solar-powered “carbon flux tower”, funded by Aviva, measures the exchange of greenhouse gases in the area.
The state of saltmarshes varies by region. While marshes in Chichester and the Wash in East Anglia are expanding, those in North Norfolk and along the Ribble are under threat due to rising sea levels.
Estimates suggest that 85% of the UK’s saltmarshes have been lost since the mid-19th century. Yet, the remaining marshes still play a crucial role in defending the coastline from sea level rise and storm surges. They protect assets in England and Wales worth more than £200 billion.
Keep ReadingShow less
More than hundred shackled Indian’s returned to India on US military flight in February
More than a thousand Indians have been sent back from the United States since January, according to the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA).
The MEA confirmed that precisely 1,080 Indian nationals have been deported.
Approximately 62% of those deported returned on commercial flights, informed India’s spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal.
The deportations follow US President Donald Trump’s campaign against undocumented migrants entering the country. He had previously stated that he believes India “will do what’s right” in the matter of deporting illegal migrants.
This move by the US reflects a global trend of increasingly strict immigration controls.
Over a hundred shackled Indians were repatriated on a US military flight in February alone.
“We have close cooperation between India and the United States on migration issues,” said Jaiswal during the ministry’s weekly briefing. He added that deported Indians are only accepted back after strict verification of their nationality.
It is estimated that around 18,000 Indian nationals have entered the US illegally.
The US Embassy in India has issued a warning that overstaying in the US—even by those who entered legally—could lead to deportation or a permanent ban.
Jaiswal also raised concerns about President Trump’s proposed revisions to student visa policies, which could affect Indian students planning to study in the US. However, the Indian government has assured that the welfare of Indian students remains its “utmost priority”.
On Thursday, it was revealed that the US is pausing the scheduling of new visa interviews for foreign students as it considers expanding the screening of their social media activity. Student visa appointments under the F, M and J categories will be temporarily halted by American embassies.
US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem reiterated that all foreign nationals living in the US for over 30 days must register under the Alien Registration Act, a strict requirement enforced by an executive order signed by Trump.
“While we note that the issuance of a visa is a sovereign function, we hope that the applications of Indian students will be considered on merit, and that they will be able to join their academic programmes on time,” said Randhir Jaiswal. A total of 333,000 Indian students have travelled to the US for studies in 2023–24, constituting the largest share of the country’s international student population.
The Ministry of External Affairs has assured that it will closely monitor developments and continue to engage with US authorities to ensure the fair treatment of Indian nationals.