Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Indian court declines interim relief to Vedanta owned Sterlite

AN INDIAN court yesterday (1) declined to provide any interim comfort to Vedanta owned Sterlite to conduct maintenance work at its closed copper smelter unit in Tuticorin of the southern Indian state, Tamil Nadu.

The Madras high court posted the matter to March 27 for further hearing. The bench has also asked the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB) to file its reply by then inconnection with the case.


Sterlite in its plea filed according to the recent suggestion of the country’s top court, has questioned the May 23, 2018 orders of TNPCB refusing the renewal consent to the plant as well as permanent closure, terming them as wholly illegal, unconstitutional and ultra vires.

Earlier,Tamil Nadu state government ordered the permanent shutdown of the plant in the wake of violent protests against Sterlite that led to death of 13 people in police firing last year.

The local residents were protesting against environment pollution being allegedly caused by the copper smelter.

India’s apex court on February 18 had set aside the order of the country’s environment court permitting the opening of the plant but gave a choice to the firm to approach the high court against the closure order.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Thames Water

Thames Water is facing a fresh battle over who should take control of its financially troubled business

Getty Images

Could Thames Water’s £10bn rescue deal leave Britain with an even bigger problem?

  • MPs want the government to reject a £10bn rescue proposal from Thames Water’s creditors.
  • The company has more than £20bn of debt and serves around 16 million customers.
  • The EFRA Committee says Thames Water is trapped in a “doom loop” and wants stronger powers for earlier government intervention.

The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (EFRA) Committee has urged the government to reject a £10bn restructuring proposal from London & Valley Water, a consortium of more than 100 Thames Water creditors.

The committee said the proposal did not have “the interests of the public, the company or the environment at heart”, arguing that the consortium’s priority appeared to be extracting immediate value rather than securing Thames Water’s long-term future.

Keep ReadingShow less