India among 15 nations added to UK’s ‘Deport Now, Appeal Later’ scheme
Foreigners who have had their human rights claim refused will be able to join appeal hearings remotely from overseas using video technology, the Home Office said.
Foreign national offenders make up around 12 per cent of the UK prison population. (Photo: Getty Images)
Vivek Mishra works as an Assistant Editor with Eastern Eye and has over 13 years of experience in journalism. His areas of interest include politics, international affairs, current events, and sports. With a background in newsroom operations and editorial planning, he has reported and edited stories on major national and global developments.
INDIA is among 15 countries added to the UK’s expanded “Deport Now, Appeal Later” scheme, under which foreign criminals will be deported to their home countries before they can appeal against convictions. The UK government said on Sunday the number of countries in the scheme will rise from eight to 23.
Foreigners who have had their human rights claim refused will be able to join appeal hearings remotely from overseas using video technology, the Home Office said.
Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said she plans to change the law so that most foreign criminals are deported immediately after receiving a prison sentence.
Foreign national offenders make up about 12 per cent of the prison population, and the move could save money, according to Mahmood.
The Home Office said almost 5,200 convicted criminals with foreign passports have been removed since July 2024, a 14 per cent increase over the previous year.
The scheme previously covered nationals from Tanzania, Finland, Estonia, Belize, and four other countries. It will now also include India, Angola, Australia, Botswana, Brunei, Bulgaria, Canada, Guyana, Indonesia, Kenya, Latvia, Lebanon, Malaysia, Uganda and Zambia.
The government said talks are continuing with other countries to join the programme.
“For far too long, foreign criminals have been exploiting our immigration system, remaining in the UK for months or even years while their appeals drag on,” Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said.
“That has to end. Those who commit crimes in our country cannot be allowed to manipulate the system,” she said.
The Ministry of Justice said most foreign prisoners can now be deported after serving 30 per cent of their sentence, down from 50 per cent, with discretion retained on a case-by-case basis. Offenders deported under this law will be barred from re-entering the UK.
Pakistani women in London faced a 60 per cent gender pay gap compared with men from the same ethnic group, and Bangladeshi women faced a 50 per cent gap.
A CITY Hall report has called for employers, local leaders and the government to take action to support Bangladeshi and Pakistani women into London’s workforce.
The research found that in 2022, 48.1 per cent of Bangladeshi and Pakistani women in London were economically inactive, with unemployment levels more than three times higher than men from the same communities (16.9 per cent compared with 5.5 per cent). Pakistani women in London faced a 60 per cent gender pay gap compared with men from the same ethnic group, and Bangladeshi women faced a 50 per cent gap.
Barriers identified in the report include bias in recruitment and promotion, inflexible workplace cultures, lack of childcare, exclusion from networks, unrecognised qualifications, limited digital skills and visa restrictions. Some women reported changing their names to secure interviews.
Commissioned by the Mayor’s Workforce Integration Network (WIN) and conducted by the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, the report recommends inclusive outreach, flexible working, recognition of overseas qualifications and clear progression opportunities.
Deputy Mayor for Communities and Social Justice Dr Debbie Weekes-Bernard said: “London is one of the most diverse cities in the world but shockingly too many Londoners experience huge barriers when trying to find secure, well-paid jobs. This research highlights the obstacles facing Bangladeshi and Pakistani women, and outlines how prejudice, discrimination and a lack of support severely limits their chances to succeed. We all have a role to play if we are to reduce this inequality, and from City Hall we’re working with communities, businesses and local leaders to help remove everyday barriers, including through the Workforce Integration Network and the London Anchor Institutions’ Network to build inclusive workplaces and improve access to good jobs. Only by listening to the experiences of Londoners can we build a more inclusive city, where everyone has the chance to succeed.”
Professor Adrian Pabst from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research said: “Despite having long enriched the city’s social, cultural, and economic life, Bangladeshi and Pakistani women in London continue to face entrenched structural and systemic barriers, which prevent them from accessing and advancing their chosen careers. The recommendations from our research offer practical solutions that have implications for the national effort to reduce economic inactivity.”
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Aimee Betro, 45, was extradited from Armenia earlier this year to face trial in Birmingham after a years-long police search. (Photo credit: West Midlands Police)
AN AMERICAN woman has been found guilty by a UK court of taking part in a 2019 plot to kill a British man involved in a family feud.
Aimee Betro, 45, was extradited from Armenia earlier this year to face trial in Birmingham, central England, after a years-long police search.
Prosecutors said Betro wore a niqab to cover her face when she got out of a car in September 2019 and tried to shoot Sikander Ali at close range. The gun jammed, and Ali drove away in his parked car outside his home.
According to prosecutors, Betro conspired with Mohammed Aslam, 56, and his son Mohammed Nabil Nazir, 31. Betro met Nazir on an online dating site and told the jury she was in love with him.
Both men were jailed last year for their roles in the feud, which began after they were injured in a fight at Ali’s father’s clothing store in July 2018.
“Betro tried to kill a man in a Birmingham street at point-blank range. It is sheer luck that he managed to get away unscathed,” prosecutor Hannah Sidaway told the court. She said the case came to trial after “years of hard work doggedly pursuing Aimee Betro across countries and borders.”
Betro, a graphic design graduate from Wisconsin, denied three charges, including conspiracy to murder and possession of a self-loading pistol, claiming she did not know about the plot. She said it was “just a terrible coincidence” that she was near the scene and alleged the real shooter was “another American woman” who sounded like her and had the same phone and brand of trainers.
Police said there was no evidence Betro was paid for her role in the attempt. She will be sentenced on August 21.
(Agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Decisions on providing such details have been left to individual forces (Photo: Getty Images)
POLICE forces across the UK have been instructed to consider disclosing the ethnicity and nationality of suspects charged in high-profile and sensitive cases, under new national guidance aimed at improving transparency and reducing the spread of misinformation.
The direction, issued jointly by the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) and the College of Policing, came into immediate effect on Wednesday (13).
It advised that forces should release details of a suspect’s background when there is a clear policing purpose, such as tackling false information surrounding an incident or when public safety might be at risk.
Deputy chief constable Sam de Reya, the NPCC lead for communications and media, said the change was designed for “an age of social media where information spreads rapidly — and often inaccurately”.
She added that recent high-profile cases and last summer’s disorder had shown the real-world consequences of what police choose to release. “It is essential that we fill information vacuums with accurate facts of wider public interest,” she explained.
Until now, police communications have typically named suspects, given an age, and provided an address upon charge, without any specific requirement to release nationality, ethnicity, or immigration status.
Decisions on providing such details have been left to individual forces, leading to varied approaches and criticism in some cases.
One of the most prominent recent examples involved two men charged over the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton last month. Reports suggested they were Afghan asylum seekers, but this was not officially confirmed by Warwickshire Police, which followed the existing guidance at the time.
The absence of confirmation prompted claims of a “cover-up” from political figures, including Reform UK’s Nigel Farage. The incident led home secretary Yvette Cooper to call for “more transparency” in such matters. Riots related the Southport killings last year also weighed heavily in the background to this change.
In that case, the absence of early official information about the suspect’s background allowed false claims to spread online, including that the attacker was a Muslim asylum seeker, and riots followed in several parts of England and Northern Ireland.
An independent review later said this misinformation had played a role in sparking disorder. By contrast, Merseyside Police in May quickly confirmed that a man arrested after driving into crowds during Liverpool FC’s Premier League victory parade was a white British national — a move widely credited with quelling speculation about terrorism.
According to reports, the updated guidance said forces should weigh legal, ethical, and fairness concerns before releasing details, with the final decision resting locally.
The NPCC stressed that nothing should be made public if it risks prejudicing a fair trial. The responsibility for verifying a suspect’s immigration status remains with the Home Office, which has said it will authorise the release of such information when “appropriate to do so” at the request of police.
A Home Office spokesperson said both the public and police wanted greater clarity on when and why such details are made available, as well as legitimate reasons for withholding them.
Policing minister Dame Diana Johnson has welcomed the new rules as “a positive step” towards being more open with the public, while underlining the importance of protecting due process. “We want [police] to be as open as possible,” she said, but not in a way that could prejudice a trial.
She noted that the current practice of publishing names and addresses when suspects are charged will now be extended to include nationality and ethnicity, unless there is a strong reason not to do so.
While the move has been applauded by some campaigners and former prosecutors as a way to build trust and counter false stories, others have raised concerns.
Critics warn the guidance could put extra pressure on forces to reveal details in every case, potentially stoking community tensions.
Former Metropolitan Police chief superintendent Dal Babu described a “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” situation, saying the expectation to disclose could spark speculation when information is withheld.
Some anti-racism campaigners have also expressed fears that linking crime stories to ethnicity or migration status could fuel prejudice, and they argue that care must be taken to avoid stigmatising communities.
The NPCC insisted the approach is about balance. De Reya said good policing involved “proactively sharing facts to prevent the vacuum that breeds false narratives”, and that communication practices must be fit for the speed and reach of modern media.
Reports revealed that the guidance will be reviewed later in the year.
Keep ReadingShow less
Maharashtra state culture minister Adv. Ashish Shelar receives the 18th-century sword of Raghuji Raje Bhosale in London on August 11, 2025.
MEMBERS of the Maharashtrian diaspora in London on Tuesday (12) celebrated the “homecoming” of a historic 18th-century sword belonging to the famous Maratha general Raghuji Bhosale I, founder of the Bhosale dynasty of Nagpur.
Maharashtra state minister for culture and IT, Ashish Shelar, addressed the Maharashtra Mandal London gathering a day after he took formal possession of the “Khanda”, which the state government had acquired for more than £39,000at a Sotheby’s auction in April.
The treasured artefact has now completed the legal formalities for its return to India and is set to be received with grandeur at a glittering cultural event in Mumbai on Monday (18).
“The historical importance of this sword is immense, and it is a matter of great pride that Maharashtra now has ownership of it,” said Shelar.
“Raghuji Bhosale was known for his bravery and skill, under whom the Maratha Empire extended from Odisha to the southern regions of India. Therefore, it is not merely a heritage object but also a symbol of the exceptional warrior skills of the Marathas, which will inspire future generations to learn more about Indian history and achievements."
The sword, auctioned in London as a “Basket-Hilt Sword (Khanda)”, is described as a slightly curved, European-style, single-edged blade. The spine is inlaid with gold in Devanagari script, referring to Raghuji Bhosale I’s title of “Senasahibsubha”, meaning Lord of the Provinces and the Army.
The Maharashtra government intervened to acquire the iconic piece with the assistance of the High Commission of India in London.
“The sword, re-purchased by the Government of Maharashtra, will be handed over to the Directorate of Archaeology and Museums for public display,” India House in London said in a statement.
Historians believe the sword may have left India during the 1817 Battle of Sitabuldi, when the British East India Company defeated the Nagpur Bhosales and seized valuable artefacts and weapons from the region.
Upon its arrival in Mumbai, the sword will be welcomed with an auspicious vandan ritual, followed by a grand cultural event at Ravindra Natyamandir, P. L. Deshpande Maharashtra Kala Academy, before being transferred to the Central Museum in Nagpur.
This will mark the start of a wider journey for the Khanda, as it travels across different parts of India.
While in London, the Maharashtra minister also held high-level discussions with the Victoria and Albert (V&A) Museum as part of the state government’s plans to construct a world-class museum in the Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai.
This follows a loan agreement with the V&A last year, which allowed a 17th-century Wagh Nakh (Tiger Claws) – believed to have belonged to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj – to travel to Maharashtra for the 350th anniversary of the legendary Maratha warrior’s coronation.
Vrushal Khandke, president of Maharashtra Mandal London, felicitated Ashish Shelar with a replica of the Wagh Nakh as he was greeted by the energetic beats of dhol tasha.
Khandke also made a request, on behalf of the UK-based Maharashtrian diaspora, to establish a memorial to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj in a prominent central London location. He appealed for government support in making this vision a reality, Maharashtra Mandal London said in a statement.
The charity also expressed gratitude to the state government, under the leadership of Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, for sanctioning a grant of £422,500 on January 31during the Vishwa Marathi Sammelan in Pune, to obtain the freehold ownership of Maharashtra Bhavan in north London, the statement added.
(PTI)
Keep ReadingShow less
Protesters calling for the closure of The Bell Hotel, believed to be housing asylum seekers, gather outside the council offices in Epping on August 8, 2025.
Epping Forest District Council applies for High Court injunction over Bell Hotel use
Protests began after asylum seeker charged with assaulting a 14-year-old girl
At least six protests since July, with 28 arrests and 16 charges
Council cites breach of planning permission and community safety concerns
THE COUNCIL in Epping, northeast of London, has applied for a High Court injunction to stop asylum seekers being housed in a local hotel, following protests, some of which turned violent.
Epping Forest District Council is seeking an interim injunction to prevent the Bell Hotel from accommodating asylum seekers and refugees, citing “the clear risk of further escalating community tensions.”
“The current situation cannot go on. If the Bell Hotel was a nightclub we could have closed it down long ago,” council leader Chris Whitbread of the Conservative party said in a statement.
Protests and police action
Protests began in July after an asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl, which he denies. Since then, hundreds of people have joined protests and counter-protests outside the hotel. Anti-immigration demonstrations have also taken place in London and other parts of England.
Police said there have been at least six protests in Epping since July 17, with 28 people arrested and 16 charged in connection with disorder. Police officers and vehicles have been attacked during some protests.
Council’s concerns
The council says the building’s use breaches planning permissions because it is no longer operating as a hotel and is near schools and a care home.
“So far as the council is aware, there is no criminal record checking of individuals ... before being housed at the hotel,” Whitbread said.
“The use by the Home Office of the premises for asylum seekers poses a clear risk of further escalating community tensions already at a high, and the risk of irreparable harm to the local community.”
Prime minister Keir Starmer has pledged to reduce the number of migrants and asylum seekers in the UK to counter pressure from the Reform UK party. But Whitbread accused the government of “not listening.”
“We should not have to take this fight to the High Court, but we are left with no choice,” he said.