A survey last week among Muslim voters showed that only 43 per cent of those who voted for Labour in the 2019 general election declared they will vote for the party again
By BARNIE CHOUDHURY and SARWAR ALAM Feb 14, 2024
LABOUR is “haemorrhaging” the Muslim vote, which will have a negative impact when Britain holds the general election, expected later this year, party MPs have told Eastern Eye.
Late on Monday (12), Labour withdrew its support and suspended for its candidate for Rochdale, Azhar Ali, following criticism of remarks he made about Israel.
Ali will still appear on the ballot as the party's candidate and should he win, he will be an independent MP.
It is a major blow for Labour as Rochdale was considered to be a safe seat.
A survey last week among Muslim voters showed that only 43 per cent of those who voted for Labour in the 2019 general election declared they will vote for the party again.
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer’s handling of the ongoing Israel-Gaza war was cited as a key reason in leaving Muslim voters feeling “disillusioned”.
“They've haemorrhaged the Muslim vote and they've not done anything to try and go back and amend the damage they've done,” one Labour MP told Eastern Eye.
“The moral high ground right now on Gaza, belongs to the Tories (foreign secretary David Cameron earlier this month called for a ceasefire in the region and later said the UK is considering a push to recognise a Palestinian state),” the Labour MP added.
“We've been outflanked by the Tories time and time again. Muslim voters feel like they no longer have a political home, that’s how disillusioned they feel.
“The narrative in the community now is, ‘we'd rather not have a political home, than be taken for granted by the Labour party’.”
Sir Keir Starmer (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)
Trust issues
Last Friday (9) the shadow justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood MP, said there had been “a loss of trust” from British Muslims in the party over Israel-Gaza issue and urged Labour to “rebuild” relations with Muslim voters.
Data from a research company, Survation, and the Labour Muslim Network (LMN) found that 86 per cent of British Muslims voted Labour in the 2019 general election.
Asked how they would vote now, only 43 per cent said they will definitely vote Labour again, while 23 per cent were undecided.
“I believe Labour is going to lose a lot of Muslim voters. The party have previously taken Muslim voters for granted,” a Labour parliamentarian told Eastern Eye.
“There was an assumption that Muslims just voted Labour.
“That was a comfortable assumption because that's how it appeared in lots of Muslim communities.
“However, a series of decisions have been made that have affected how the Muslim community feel about Labour.
“They feel an incongruency with their values and some of what the Labour Party appears to have supported and stood for.”
Shabana Mahmood (Picture by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)
“Complete disaster”
A Westminster insider described the situation as a “complete disaster”.
“It's actually worse than it was during Iraq.
“In the middle of the Iraq crisis, there was a by-election, which Labour lost really, really badly.
“The key day, of course is February 29, when we find out the by-election result for Rochdale.”
On Monday, Sir Keir called for a “sustainable ceasefire” in relation to the Israel-Gaza conflict, saying it would be “catastrophic” if Israel attacked Rafah where 1.4 million displaced Palestinians are based.
However, his initial stance on the war in October, when he refused to call for a ceasefire and suggested Israel had the "right" to cut off water and energy to Gaza, led to the resignations by a number of frontbench Labour MPs and councillors.
“If you look at some of the things that have happened, that have been particularly unfortunate, such as (Starmer’s) comments on LBC about Israel having the rights to cut off water and electricity to Gaza and then no clarification issued for nine days,” the Labour parliamentarian said.
“Even then, it was a bit of gaslighting, really, as to the fact that's not quite what he meant to say.
“But, really and truly, the Muslim community and the wider community have been let down.”
Azhar Ali (Picture by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)
“Disingenuous” Starmer
The parliamentarian also revealed there have been briefings within Labour that have insinuated this is a Muslim against Jews issue.
“It’s been suggested that Muslims cared about Gaza was because they were anti-Semitic - that assumption is really dangerous,” said the parliamentarian.
“There were some briefings where they said the Muslim voters are really unhappy with us (Labour) because of our tough stance on anti-Semitism, which is horrendous to say, because that basically says Muslims hate Jews.
“When in fact, the whole premise of being a Muslim is the fact that you care about human rights, regardless of who's affected.”
The Labour MP said Sir Keir’s change of stance on Gaza was “disingenuous” and a ploy to garner the Muslim vote.
“If you look at the scripted comments that came out from Starmer on Twitter (now X), a couple of hours later David Lammy spouts exactly the same lines. It's condescending.
“People aren’t stupid, it’s just not Muslim voters, any voter.
“If you look at the two tweets that were sent out (calling for a ceasefire), it was appalling - it was like they're controlling the narrative.
“There's no politics in it anymore, it's just a narrative to get into power.
“Muslims know Labour isn't ahead because it's brilliant, Labour is ahead because the Tories are so crap.
“Starmer is as toxic on the doorsteps as Jeremy Corbyn was pre-2019.”
Independent challenges
The Westminster insider revealed that Muslim communities were coming together to put up independent candidates in the upcoming general election and described the situation as “catastrophic” for Labour.
“There was a meeting in different mosques in the country on Sunday (11).
“The one in Harrow said independent candidates were going to be put up in 30 constituencies,” said the Westminster insider.
“There is no way Muslims are going to go out and vote positively for Labour.
“The two ways Labour are hurt is if they stay at home, and secondly, and more significantly, while they won’t vote Tory, they will vote positively for an independent candidate.”
No recovery
A new website, themuslimvote.co.uk, was recently launched and asked Muslim voters to back a number of locally approved candidates.
It said it was “focused on seats where the Muslim vote can influence the outcome” and will not back anyone “who voted against or abstained on the ceasefire vote”.
Among its backers are NGOs, community groups and Muslim-run businesses.
Leanne Mohamad
One Labour MP described as “astonishing” the level of funding donated towards independent candidates to run against Labour.
Tasnime Akunjee, the lawyer who represents Londoner Shamima Begum who was stripped of her UK citizenship after she joined Daesh (Islamic State group), has announced he will stand as an independent candidate in the Bethnal Green and Bow seat in east London.
Shadow business minister Rushanara Ali MP represents the seat in the Commons.
Pro-Palestinian activist Leanne Mohamad has been installed to stand against shadow health secretary Wes Streeting in Ilford North, with a major fundraising campaign already underway to back her.
“They say there are 30 constituencies, but actually I think it's more than 30, because 30 is where there is a substantial vote - meaning over 15,000.
“There are other seats where there are 3,000 to 5,000 votes, such as Gerrard's Cross (south Buckinghamshire)… you wouldn't think it, but there are lots of Muslims living there and other places, like the outer suburbs of London such as Essex are the same,” said the Westminster insider.
“There's no way the Labour Party can recover from this.”
A Labour spokesperson told Eastern Eye, “The Labour party is committed to a strong relationship with the Muslim community.
“We have been clear that we need to see a sustainable ceasefire and that aid getting into Gaza must be ramped up.
“Labour is committed to tackling Islamophobia and will continue to robustly stand up for the rights of Muslims in our party and wider society.”
Academic: Discontent with party more likely to be felt in by-election
MARIA SOBOLEWSKA, a professor of political science at the University of Manchester, told Eastern Eye Muslim voters’ discontent with the Labour Party would more likely be felt in by-elections rather than the general election, writes Sarwar Alam.
She said although the Israel-Gaza situation was important to Muslim voters, during a general election, it will be other issues closer to home that will take priority when voters decide who to cast their ballots for.
“Muslim voters are the same as any other voters. Foreign policy for them and the issue of Palestine and Gaza are just one of the issues they care about – but not all of them will put that as number one.
“You still see a lot of voters caring more about the NHS, the economy, the cost of living crisis - all of those things would still trump the considerations of the situation in Gaza,” said Sobolewska.
“By-elections are not run on ‘let’s change the government issues’, so we see what is called expressive voting, where people vote more on their principles and more as a protest vote, expressing frustration with both sides.
“The by-election is just the one seat. This is a very good time to send the message to both parties, declaring ‘you have to change your stance and we're not happy’.
“For Muslim voters, it can be a message to Labour saying, ‘we feel like you've abandoned us’.
“However, when it comes to the general election, people are much more likely to vote in a strategic manner and what's best for the country, overall. And Muslim voters, like any other voters, they live in the same country and I think they are fed up with this government more than what’s happening abroad.”
Maria Sobolewska
Sobolewska cast doubt on the overall impact of the Muslim vote on the next general election. Muslims tend to live in Labour safe seats, and there aren't many that would change hands just on the back of the Muslim vote, she said.
Research from the think-tank British Future found that while Labour risks losing “significant numbers of Muslim voters”, it was unlikely to lose “even a handful of seats” as a result at the upcoming election.
Its findings showed the general election challenge for independent candidates is that almost no Westminster constituencies could be won with an appeal to a single minority group.
“Muslim voters might say, ‘we are leaving the Labour Party because of Keir Starmer’s stance on Gaza’, but they have nowhere to go, because it was pretty much the stance of all the parties,” said Sobolewska.
“I suspect that even though British Muslims, maybe in greater numbers, will say ‘Labour is not my party, I don't feel they represent me’, when push comes to shove at the general election, their choice comes to letting in the Conservative government or voting Labour, they’ll hold their noses and vote Labour.”
Yusuf, who resigned as Reform chairman last week before returning two days later, said he wanted to be 'crystal clear' on the party’s stance. (Photo: Getty Images)
ZIA YUSUF has said that Reform UK would deport every illegal immigrant in Britain if the party came to power.
Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Yusuf stated, “We will deport everybody who is here in this country illegally, which is roughly about 1.2 million people.”
Yusuf, who resigned as Reform chairman last week before returning two days later, said he wanted to be “crystal clear” on the party’s stance.
Addressing recent criticisms within the party, he added, “I am Muslim. I don’t therefore think that Islam is a ‘threat to the country’,” but said “resentment” was building due to “two-tier policing.”
He said Islamist terrorism remained a major concern for intelligence agencies and pointed to issues of assimilation. Yusuf described his resignation as a result of “exhaustion” and regretted a tweet criticising new MP Sarah Pochin’s comments on a burqa ban.
Nigel Farage is expected to present Yusuf as a potential cabinet minister while also pledging to reopen some coal mines in south Wales.
Richard Tice, Reform deputy, said Yusuf had faced “horrendous online abuse” and added the party was reorganising to manage growth. Nick Candy will take over Yusuf’s former responsibilities.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
The teenager was walking along Staniforth Road in the Darnall area on Wednesday when a grey Audi reportedly hit an electric bike rider before striking Abdullah. (Photo credit: South Yorkshire Police)
TWO men have been charged with murder and three counts of attempted murder after the death of a 16-year-old boy in an alleged hit-and-run in Sheffield.
Zulkernain Ahmed, 20, and Amaan Ahmed, 26, both from Locke Drive, have been charged over the death of Abdullah Yaser Abdullah Al Yazidi, according to South Yorkshire Police.
The teenager was walking along Staniforth Road in the Darnall area on Wednesday when a grey Audi reportedly hit an electric bike rider before striking Abdullah. He later died in hospital.
An 18-year-old man on the bike was seriously injured but is not believed to be in a life-threatening condition.
The two men are due to appear at Sheffield Magistrates’ Court on Monday. A 46-year-old man and a 45-year-old woman arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender remain on bail.
Abdullah had recently arrived in the UK from Yemen and was preparing to start college. Family and friends said he was devoted to his family and had been learning English.
Darnall councillor Qais Al-Ahdal said, “We’ve really lost someone who is good in the community… May God have mercy on his soul.”
Keep ReadingShow less
Israel had vowed in advance to prevent the ship from reaching Gaza
Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg was among a group of pro-Palestinian campaigners on board a Gaza-bound aid vessel intercepted by Israeli forces and diverted to its shores, the country’s Foreign Ministry confirmed on 9 June.
The ship, Madleen, was organised by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, a group challenging Israel’s blockade of Gaza. It had departed Sicily on 1 June, carrying a dozen activists and a symbolic amount of humanitarian supplies.
Israeli military blocks flotilla’s progress
Israel had vowed in advance to prevent the ship from reaching Gaza. Defence Minister Yoav Gallant said the military was instructed to stop the vessel “by any means necessary”. The Foreign Ministry later confirmed the Madleen had been redirected to Israel and that its passengers would be repatriated.
In a social media post, the ministry dismissed the effort as a publicity stunt by “celebrities”, referring to it as the “‘selfie yacht’ of the ‘celebrities’”. It accused Thunberg and others of staging a “media provocation”. Footage released showed passengers in life jackets being offered sandwiches and water after interception.
The Freedom Flotilla Coalition claimed it lost contact with the ship after alarms were triggered and drones were seen overhead. The group accused the Israeli military of “kidnapping” the activists. Surveillance footage appeared to show a vessel approaching and personnel boarding the Madleen.
Thunberg voices opposition to blockade
Greta Thunberg, known globally for her environmental activism, has been a strong critic of Israel’s actions in Gaza. Speaking last week, she said, “No matter what odds we are against, we have to keep trying... it’s not even near as dangerous as the silence of the entire world in the face of the live-streamed genocide.”
Israeli Defence Minister Gallant responded sharply, calling Thunberg “an antisemite” and warning that the ship would not be allowed to reach its destination. “Israel will act against any attempt to breach the blockade or aid terrorist organisations,” he said.
Small-scale aid onboard
The Madleen carried a limited quantity of humanitarian goods, including baby formula, flour, rice, medical supplies, children’s prosthetics, and diapers. The Israeli Foreign Ministry called the shipment “tiny”, adding it was “less than a single truckload of aid”.
Israel, along with Egypt, has maintained a blockade on Gaza since Hamas took control of the region in 2007. While Israeli officials say the measure is needed to prevent arms smuggling, rights groups argue it restricts essential goods and worsens the humanitarian crisis.
Repeat of earlier flotilla efforts
This is not the first attempt by activists to challenge the blockade. In 2010, a similar flotilla mission involving the Mavi Marmara ended in bloodshed when Israeli commandos boarded the ship, resulting in the deaths of nine people. A tenth person later died from injuries sustained during the raid.
Israel said its forces were attacked with clubs and knives during the operation. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition described it as “an unlawful and deadly attack”, saying the Madleen’s mission was “a continuation of that legacy”.
A separate mission earlier this year was also thwarted when a ship named Conscience, departing from Tunisia and en route to Malta, caught fire following explosions near the vessel. No injuries were reported, but the mission was called off.
Aid distribution remains contentious
In parallel with the flotilla controversy, Israel has promoted a new aid delivery mechanism via the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. The group claims to have delivered over 1.1 million meals and 11 truckloads of food on 9 June across three distribution sites.
However, the initiative has faced criticism and has been boycotted by the UN and other major organisations. They accuse Israel of using humanitarian aid as a tool of control and allege that the new system sidelines independent oversight.
The foundation suspended operations temporarily on 8 June, citing threats from Hamas. A spokesperson claimed that local workers received warnings of “serious consequences” if they continued with the aid delivery programme.
Keep ReadingShow less
Several cars burn on North Los Angeles street during clashes between protesters and police on June 8, 2025 in Downtown Los Angeles, California, US. (Photo: Getty Images)
PROTESTERS set fire to vehicles and clashed with police in Los Angeles on Sunday after President Donald Trump sent National Guard troops to the city. Officers kept crowds away from the troops, who had been deployed as unrest entered a third day.
The protests were triggered by recent immigration raids carried out by federal officials, which have led to the arrest of dozens of people identified by authorities as undocumented migrants and gang members.
The raids began in broad daylight on Friday in a city with a large Latino population. The deployment of California’s National Guard — usually controlled by the state’s governor — was criticised by opponents who said Trump was escalating tensions. Trump has made strict immigration enforcement a central part of his second-term agenda.
"We didn’t have a problem until Trump got involved," California Governor Gavin Newsom wrote on X.
"This is a serious breach of state sovereignty — inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed. Rescind the order. Return control to California," he added.
At least three Waymo self-driving vehicles were set on fire on Sunday, and two others were vandalised as protesters moved through parts of downtown Los Angeles.
Traffic was stopped for over an hour on a major freeway while people gathered on the road. Officers from the California Highway Patrol dispersed them using flash-bangs and smoke grenades.
After a brief early confrontation outside a detention centre between Department of Homeland Security agents and a few dozen protesters, most clashes involved local police.
By early afternoon, Los Angeles Police Department officers set up containment lines away from federal buildings, keeping demonstrators from reaching armed National Guard troops from the 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, who were stationed in camouflage gear and helmets.
As night fell, groups of masked protesters remained in certain areas, with some throwing projectiles and fireworks.
The LAPD said 56 people had been arrested over two days, and three officers had sustained minor injuries.
‘Troops everywhere’
Trump defended the use of troops, suggesting more could be deployed in other parts of the country.
"You have violent people, and we are not going to let them get away with it," he told reporters. "I think you’re going to see some very strong law and order."
Asked if he would invoke the Insurrection Act, which allows the military to operate as domestic police, Trump said: "We’re looking at troops everywhere. We’re not going to let this happen to our country."
US Northern Command, part of the Department of Defense, said "approximately 500 Marines... are in a prepared-to-deploy status should they be necessary to augment and support" federal operations.
The National Guard is usually deployed for natural disasters or, occasionally, civil unrest, with the agreement of state officials.
Trump’s decision to send in the Guard without the governor’s consent is the first such move since 1965, during the civil rights era. Democrats, including former vice president Kamala Harris, criticised it. Harris called the move "a dangerous escalation meant to provoke chaos."
‘Intimidation’
Republicans supported Trump’s decision.
"I have no concern about that at all," said House Speaker Mike Johnson, accusing Newsom of "an inability or unwillingness to do what is necessary".
Protesters told AFP they believed the deployment was meant to deter dissent.
"I think it’s an intimidation tactic," said Thomas Henning. "These protests have been peaceful. There’s no one trying to do any sort of damage right now and yet you have the National Guard with loaded magazines and large guns standing around trying to intimidate Americans from exercising our First Amendment rights."
Marshall Goldberg, 78, said the presence of the troops made him feel "so offended."
"We hate what they’ve done with the undocumented workers, but this is moving it to another level of taking away the right to protest and the right to just peaceably assemble," he told AFP.
ICE raids in other US cities have led to smaller protests in recent months, but the unrest in Los Angeles is the most significant reaction to Trump’s immigration policies so far.
A CBS News poll conducted before the Los Angeles protests showed a slight majority of Americans supported the immigration crackdown.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Siddiq stepped down from her role in the UK government after being accused of benefiting from the administration led by former Bangladeshi prime minister Sheikh Hasina. (Photo: Getty Images)
FORMER UK minister Tulip Siddiq has requested a meeting with Bangladesh’s chief adviser Muhammad Yunus in London to discuss what she called a “misunderstanding” related to corruption allegations against her.
In a letter dated June 4, Siddiq asked for a chance to meet Yunus during his visit to the UK from June 10 to 13. Yunus is expected to meet King Charles and visit Downing Street to meet Keir Starmer during the trip.
Siddiq said she hoped the meeting would “help clear up the misunderstanding perpetuated by the anti-corruption committee in Dhaka that I have questions to answer about my mother's sister, the former prime minister of Bangladesh, Sheikh Hasina”.
“I am a UK citizen, born in London and representing the people of Hampstead and Highgate in parliament for the last decade. I have no property nor any business interests whatsoever in Bangladesh,” she said.
“I have sought to clarify this to the ACC, but they refuse to engage with my lawyers in London and apparently keep sending correspondence to a random address in Dhaka,” she added.
Allegations linked to land plot in Bangladesh
Siddiq stepped down from her role in the UK government after being accused of benefiting from the administration led by former Bangladeshi prime minister Sheikh Hasina. Her aunt, Hasina, was put on trial in absentia last week over crimes against humanity during her 15-year tenure as prime minister.
The Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) in Bangladesh alleged that Siddiq or her mother obtained a 7,200 sq ft plot of land through “abuse of power and influence”. Siddiq has denied the claim, and her legal team has called the accusations “politically motivated” and without basis.
Prothom Alo reported that Siddiq said she had not been contacted by authorities about the allegations.
Although she was cleared of any wrongdoing by the adviser on ministerial standards, Laurie Magnus, Siddiq resigned as economic secretary to the Treasury and city minister, saying the issue had become a “distraction” for Keir Starmer’s new government.
Arrest warrant issued in Bangladesh
Siddiq said she believed the accusations were part of a “politically motivated smear campaign” led by Hasina’s opponents.
She has yet to receive a reply from Yunus or his office, according to a source quoted by BD News. The source also said Siddiq did not understand why the ACC was pursuing her.
A warrant for Siddiq’s arrest was issued in Bangladesh last month. She said she was unaware of the warrant or of any court proceedings she was expected to attend.
Under the UK’s 2B extradition category, ministers and judges require clear evidence from Bangladesh before any arrest decision can be made.
Arrest warrants have also been issued for Siddiq’s mother, Rehana, and her siblings, who have all denied the allegations.