Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

What the Lionesses’ success reveals about unity and diversity in England

Expert says sport serves as a bridge between communities.

women’s football England

England’s women now attract some of the largest crowds in international football.

IT HAS been a dramatic month for live international sport.

South Africa’s decisive Test series win over India – their first on Indian soil for a quarter of a century – con­firmed that India’s once mighty team, in transition between generations, look anything but invincible now.


The Ashes began with Australia and England seeming to mistake Test cricket for a game of skittles – with the opening Test over in just two days, with England throwing away what had seemed a dominant position with an all too familiar batting collapse.

Scotland qualified for the men’s football World Cup for the first time since 1998 after one of the most dra­matic games in their history against Denmark – snatching victory from the jaws of elimination with two goals deep into injury time.

The fans’ celebrations at a raucous Hampden Park were even picked up on the Richter scale by the British Geological Survey’s Glasgow’s observation post as the equivalent of a very small earthquake.

women\u2019s football England Sunder Katwala

The footballing stakes were low­er at Wembley last Saturday (29) night as England’s women hosted a friendly interna­tional with China. Yet, more than 70,000 fans turned up for the match. I was there with my 13-year-old daughter. She had turned 10, when we followed the Lionesses to Brighton and Southampton as they hosted and won the European Cham­pionship for the first time in 2022. So, we wanted to be part of what was presented as a “homecoming tour” with matches in Manchester, Derby and Southampton to celebrate the Lionesses becoming European Champions again this summer. It was billed as a clash of continental cham­pions, though England were five-nil up at half-time, and won eight-nil. Brazil, who are due to host the 2027 women’s World Cup, had beaten Eng­land in Manchester.

That remarkable level of support outside of a tournament makes Eng­land’s Lionesses one of the best supported interna­tional teams in men’s or women’s sport. Family-friendly tick­et prices showed a big market if it is af­fordable to experi­ence a big, interna­tional match.

Women and girls made up a nar­row majority of the crowd. I saw plen­ty of young British Asian children of primary and secondary school-age among the families at the match, as the age-range contributed to a notice­ably more ethnically mixed crowd.

Celebratory banners on Wembley Way lauded – with slogans including “Proper England” over a picture of the massive crowds who had thronged the Mall to see the Lionesses bring the trophy home. The men’s World Cup draw this weekend will make it possi­ble to start to visualise what England’s men would need to do to emulate the women. This could be a strange World Cup – co-hosted by the US, Mexico and Canada. US president Donald Trump believes he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize, so FIFA have invented a FIFA Peace Prize to flatter his ego. Perhaps it is intended to per­suade him not to invade his co-hosts, nor to deport visiting players and sup­porters while the tournament is on. An expanded tournament of 48 teams offers some fairytale moments – as ti­ny Curacao go to the tournament, alongside Haiti and Jordan. But it also creates the longest ever tournament, taking a month to send 12 teams home before, so it may take some time for the anticipation of next sum­mer’s tournament to build.

Our England flag had come out of the wardrobe for the match for the trip to Wembley, too. My daughter’s Eng­lish class had been writing about flags, looking at John Agard’s poem which opens “what’s that fluttering in a breeze. It’s just a piece of cloth”. Flags matter: we can all recognise how in­tent and context matter to how they are received. It would be hard to find a more inclusive pride and patriotism than the way in which the Wembley crowd were cheering on the Lionesses.

Where I live in Dartford, St George’s flag bunting reflects the inclusive spirit of the local St George’s Day pa­rade, which is as diverse as the nearby schools. But when lamp-posts are drafted to carry flags – inadvertently at half-mast – it sends a more territo­rial signal, closer to Belfast than Bir­mingham. That feels very different from flags on people’s homes or in car windows during major tournaments.

The same red cross daubed on our street sign or as graffiti has a more menacing intent and reception.

The lesson from the Lionesses is not to retreat or reject flags, but to show how they can bring people to­gether. A shared pride can unite Eng­land – in a way that prejudice never could. We should show how to use the moments of next year – not just the World Cup, but also on St George’s Day to show how it is possible beyond sport to show how an inclusive pride can defeat prejudice and help to bring our diverse country together.

More For You

Court representational

David Lammy’s call to reduce the number of jury trials is not an attack on democracy; it is a long-overdue recognition of reality.

iStock

Jury trials are failing Britain - it’s time for real reform

Last week the Justice Secretary, David Lammy, proposed cutting down on jury trials. His suggestion may be controversial, but it is rooted in an uncomfortable truth: the current system is no longer fit for purpose.

As a former lay magistrate, I have seen the cracks in Britain’s justice system widening year after year. What the public is often told about the sanctity of jury service and the noble tradition of the magistracy bears little resemblance to the reality inside the courtroom. The truth is starker: our reliance on laypeople - however well-meaning - to deliver justice is no longer workable. We must remember that when the concept of jury trials was embedded in our legal system by Henry II in the 12th century, the population of Britain was a mere 2 million. Today – with a population of over 65 million – the principle of being tried by your peers is time-consuming, difficult to administer, and ridiculously expensive.

Keep ReadingShow less