Sadiq Khan: Bring back police enforcement on mask wearing
More south Asians will catch and die from Covid during the traditional winter health crisis unless the government toughens its stance on vaccinations and mask wearing in public places.
That is the warning from the British Medical Association, the London mayor, and senior Conservative Westminster insiders.
Analysis by Eastern Eye suggests that since the first national lock down on 29 March 2020 and the end of October, on average, 11 south Asians died from the pandemic every day.
In exclusive interviews, Dr Chaand Nagpaul and Sadiq Khan have told Eastern Eye that they are especially concerned for vulnerable minority groups.
“Last winter there were restrictions, there were national tears of lockdown, and people weren't mixing,” said the BMA chair.
“Now that they are mixing much more, we won't just see increases in Covid infection, but we'll see much more flu, we'll see much more respiratory illness spreading from person to person, and that will add pressure on the NHS. So, I am worried.
“There seems to be almost a mindset amongst the population that that Covid is behind us.
“It's important that there are some measures where infection control does take place to reduce spread of both Covid but other viral infections, and that doesn’t mean that we need to lock down society, far from it.
“But if you are in a taxi, it's important for both you and the cab driver to wear a mask just to reduce the infection is currently spreading.
Compulsory masks
Analysis for Eastern Eye reveals that despite intense and targeted campaigns by the government, by the end of October more than one in four south Asians (27 per cent) were still not double jabbed, and they were therefore not fully protected.
More than one in four south Asians (27 per cent) were still not double jabbed (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)
Figures from NHS England show that as of 28 October 2021, 91 per cent of Indians living here, who had their first dose, have had a second one.
This compares to 87 per cent Bangladeshis and 84 per cent among Pakistanis.
London mayor, Sadiq Khan, said the government had to implement the government’s so-called Plan B immediately.
“They should be making it compulsory, with enforcement, to wearing face masks on public transport.
“At the moment, we can't use the police or British Transport Police to enforce that compulsory facemask wearing on public transport.
“The government should reverse the decision made on the 19 July.
“The government should improve ventilation in schools because we want to make sure children are not catching the virus in school and taking it back home and giving it to their family.
“The government should give more support for those who are still isolated because, what we do know is, the lack of sick time leads to people perversely risking their own safety, their family’s safety by going to work to get money to put food on the table and pay for a roof over their head. That's why it's so important.
“The government doesn't need to wait for the conditions that require Plan B to do some of the measures now to avoid Plan B being needed.”
Sadiq Khan (Photo by Kate Green/Getty Images)
But ministers such as the chancellor, Rishi Sunak, said the data did not support “immediately moving to Plan B”.
Plan B
So, what is Plan B?
According to the government’s website, it includes:
“introducing mandatory vaccine-only COVID-status certification in certain settings” [vaccine passports]
“legally mandating face coverings in certain settings”
One senior Tory south Asian parliamentarian said it was now time to act.
“If you look at what Plan B is, the two most important things of it are guidance on working from home, which frankly people know how to do, and warning masks,” they told Eastern Eye.
“I don't think that's a massive burden on individuals to dial that up.
“If you look at the comparisons in continental Europe, and I've had people from places like France and Germany telling me that the adherence to mask wearing, whether it's on public transport or public places or places or work, is just far more compliant than in the UK.”
Eastern Eye has also tracked the numbers of deaths of south Asians from Covid since the first lock down in March 2020 to the end of October 2021.
The data reveals upward trends in deaths in April 2020, just after the first national lock down; over the winter crisis [December 2020 to the end of February 2021]; and after “Freedom Day” on 19 July 2021.
“I'm extremely worried about the coming few months because we have an NHS that has got three pressures all converging at the same time,” the BMA chair, Dr Chaand Nagpaul told Eastern Eye.
“The first is the backlog of care. There are 5.6 million patients who are on waiting lists.
“As a GP, they're increasingly coming through our doors just trying to find out when they will be seen.
“There are about 290,000 people waiting more than 12 months, and they don't know when they're going to be treated.
“So, a lot of pressure being put on trying to treat people who've been waiting for far too long, and that's before you consider that we're still seeing numbers of patients with Covid being hospitalised at levels higher than any other comparator European nation.”
Dr Chaand Nagpaul, BMA Council chair.
Vaccine uptake
The government, he said, must avoid another national lock down.
“Ultimately, any government needs to do what is right. If you reach a situation where the infection spirals out of control, if you start to see people dying at high rates, then the government will have to step in to look after the nation's health and to prevent people from suffering, falling ill and dying.
“Now, I hope sincerely, we won't come to that, and there are two key things the government needs to make sure happens.
“The first is we have to be able to vaccinate all of the eligible population as far as we can.
“We know at the moment, there are certain sectors, especially some ethnic minorities, that are not taking up the vaccine.
“What the government must prioritise is the right support, the right messaging, the right enablement, to really help communities recognise that this is actually in their own interest.
“But that will only come with trust.”
It is not clear what will trigger Plan B, but a spike in Covid cases and the pressures on the NHS could do so.
The Gov.UK website states, “If the data suggests the NHS is likely to come under unsustainable pressure, certification may need to be urgently introduced.
“In line with other nationally significant COVID legislation, we would seek to provide a vote in parliament ahead of any regulations coming into force.
“This would be subject to the urgency of the situation and parliamentary timetabling.”
But one senior south Asian Tory Westminster source told Eastern Eye, “Prevarication is your enemy. We shouldn't get into the false dichotomy of lives and livelihoods because they're actually co-correlated, right?
“We know that the less prevalent the circulation of Covid the better the economic performance because it's all about confidence.”
The government is monitoring the data, but we understand that the prime minister does not think it is time to implement Plan B.
British health secretary Sajid Javid. (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)
“We know the winter months can be challenging and our phenomenal vaccination programme is building a wall of defence to keep the virus at bay,” said Javid to this newspaper this week (10).
“Vaccines save lives and remain our best weapon of defence against COVID-19 and flu as we head into winter.
“It is vital that everyone, including south Asian communities, take up the offer of vaccines to keep themselves, their friends and family safe.
“Protection from a COVID-19 vaccine can drop after six months, and this is more likely in older and vulnerable groups.
“It has never been easier to top up your immunity. If it has been six months since your second dose and you are eligible for a booster jab you can get your vaccine at a walk-in site or you can pre-book your appointment a month in advance.”
Analysis
Our analysis shows that since the time of the first national lockdown [29 March 2020] until the end of October (31) 2021, 6,512 south Asians have died from Covid. That is an average of 11 every day.
Deaths were highest during April 2020 (1406) because the government's COVID-19 dashboard records deaths “within 28 days of a first positive laboratory-confirmed test”. So, those who contracted the virus did so before the lock down.
In May, the total number of deaths recorded was 312. That means those who caught Covid in April, one month after lock down, and died went down by almost 80 per cent.
In December the government rolled out its vaccination programme, and month-on-month the number of south Asian deaths reduced dramatically; 2,291 between March and October 2020 to 787 in the same period in 2021, a cut of almost two-thirds.
Winter pressures
The government has a “winter plan” to deal with pressures on the NHS. It starts at the end of November and lasts until the end of February.
It is often known as the “NHS winter crisis” because hospitals, GP surgeries and care homes are often under the most pressure during this time.
During last winter, 3076 south Asians perished owing to Covid. The government relaxed its rules for five days during Christmas.
Using the 28-day rule, those who caught and succumbed to the virus would most likely have been registered in the third and fourth weeks in January. Our analysis suggests recorded deaths peaked on 24 January at 426.
But in the run up to Christmas, seen in the total January figures, 1722 south Asians who caught Covid died.
Health disparities
“We know that Covid affects south Asian communities disproportionately,” Dr Chaand Nagpaul, chair of the BMA told Eastern Eye.
“They are more likely to test positive for Covid, become severely ill and die, than any other minority ethnic group.
“At a time when infection is running rampant, I am very concerned that it will be south Asian communities who once again suffer worse outcomes.
“Racial disparity has been a tragic feature of this pandemic, and unless the Covid infection rates are reduced, this will persist.
“If the UK government truly believes in addressing inequalities, clear communication must be matched with clearer rules.
“It must now do everything in its power to implement mandatory mask wearing, physical distancing and better ventilation in high-risk settings, and increase the uptake of first and second vaccine doses, as well as boosters.
“Without the UK government stepping up, it is tragic to think that south Asian communities will continue to suffer the consequences of inaction.”
More south Asians are protecting themselves by taking the two Covid vaccinations.
Even so, one in four remains unprotected.
At 84 per cent, British-Pakistanis remain the lowest south Asian group to be fully protected.
“The pandemic has highlighted the health inequalities, which we knew that were there,” said one Conservative south Asian senior parliamentarian.
“But it's exposed minorities to a much greater extent.
“The biggest service we can do the community is actually go after these health inequalities systematically, and they're there everywhere you look.
“We've got to spotlight them and see if we can come up with practical ways to close the gaps.”
The government said it had provided record investment to the NHS to tackle the backlog and recover services affected by the pandemic.
It said that it had ploughed in an extra £2 billion this year.
“This is a national effort,” said the health secretary, Sajid Javid.
“More than 10 million people in the UK have received vital top-up vaccines, boosting their protection and helping to reduce the pressure on the NHS, and we’ve seen record numbers of people booking in for their jab this week.
“So, to anyone who is eligible for a vaccine but still hasn’t yet taken up the offer, it is never too late to come forward and book yours.
“It could save your life and keep your family safe from the virus.”
THE US State Department on Monday said it was imposing visa restrictions on owners and staff of travel agencies in India who it says knowingly facilitate illegal migration to the United States.
An unspecified number of individuals associated with these travel agencies are being subjected to visa bans under the Immigration and Nationality Act. The action is based on information collected by the US mission in India, according to department spokesperson Tammy Bruce.
Washington often imposes such visa restrictions without naming the individuals involved.
"We will continue to take steps to impose visa restrictions against owners, executives, and senior officials of travel agencies to cut off alien smuggling networks," Bruce said. She did not provide details on how the travel agents had facilitated illegal migration.
The action is part of a broader effort under president Donald Trump's administration to curb migration to the United States and deport undocumented immigrants already in the country.
The US embassy in New Delhi has also issued repeated warnings on its social media platforms, advising Indian nationals visiting the United States not to overstay their authorised period of stay. It warned that overstaying could lead to deportation and a permanent ban from entering the country.
The Spain Airbnb crackdown has led to more than 65,000 holiday rental listings being removed from the platform, as the Spanish government takes firm action to address breaches in national regulations and respond to growing housing concerns.
The Ministry of Consumer Affairs ordered the mass delisting due to thousands of properties lacking valid licence numbers, having unclear ownership records, or showing discrepancies between listed information and official housing databases. The government said these violations warranted immediate removal from Airbnb’s platform.
This action is part of a wider effort to bring order to Spain’s short-term rental sector and alleviate the country's worsening housing affordability crisis, especially in major tourist destinations such as Madrid, Andalusia and Catalonia, where the volume of tourist rentals has surged.
Consumer Affairs Minister Pablo Bustinduy said the government aimed to end what he described as a “lack of control” and growing “illegality” in the holiday rentals market. “No more excuses. Enough with protecting those who make a business out of the right to housing in our country,” he said during a press briefing.
The decision follows a broader trend of local authorities in Spain cracking down on tourist rentals. In 2023, the city of Barcelona announced a plan to eliminate all 10,000 of its licensed short-term lets by 2028, arguing that housing must be prioritised for long-term residents rather than tourists.
The Spain Airbnb crackdown reflects rising pressure on public officials to act, as protests continue over high rents and property prices, particularly in cities with large tourism industries. Many residents and campaigners argue that the expansion of short-term rentals has significantly reduced the availability of affordable housing.
- YouTubeYouTube/ WGN News
According to official data, there were approximately 321,000 licensed holiday rental properties across Spain as of November 2023, representing a 15% increase compared to 2020. Authorities believe many more operate without licences, prompting the Consumer Affairs Ministry to open a formal investigation into Airbnb in December.
In response to earlier scrutiny, Airbnb said it requires hosts to confirm they have permission to rent their properties and that they follow local laws. However, the company also claimed the government had not provided a clear list of non-compliant listings. It added that not all owners are required to hold a licence and questioned whether the ministry had the authority to regulate digital platforms.
Airbnb has yet to issue a formal response to the latest action.
The Spain Airbnb crackdown aligns with similar efforts across Europe, including in Portugal, the Netherlands and parts of Italy, where governments are introducing stricter regulations on short-term rentals in a bid to balance tourism with long-term housing needs.
As Spain continues to grapple with housing shortages and rising costs, the government has made clear that further measures may follow to ensure platforms and property owners comply with national laws.
Keep ReadingShow less
The man stood up during a Teams call to adjust a cable behind his computer, without wearing any trousers.
A MANAGER was sacked from the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) after accidentally flashing his genitals during a video call, an employment tribunal has ruled.
The digital production manager, referred to as DB in the tribunal’s ruling, was earning £58,580 a year when the incident occurred. He stood up during a Teams call to adjust a cable behind his computer, without wearing any trousers, The Telegraph reported.
The tribunal said: “During the call, after approximately three minutes 26 seconds, the claimant stood to adjust a cable behind the computer and revealed he was wearing nothing from the waist down. His genitals were visible.”
Two Capgemini consultants based in India, who were on the call, complained to the FSCS the following week. An internal investigation concluded the staffer was “inappropriately dressed” and “naked from the waist down.”
DB, born in India, in the employment tribunal’s ruling, told his line manager in an email that he did not realise his camera was on and closed his laptop when he noticed. He was dismissed in January 2024 for breaching FSCS rules requiring employees to be dressed appropriately.
He later filed a complaint for unfair dismissal and racial discrimination. The tribunal ruled the dismissal was lawful and said his discrimination claims were not well founded, The Telegraph reported.
Keep ReadingShow less
He was jailed in October after admitting to breaching an injunction that barred him from repeating false claims about a Syrian refugee who had successfully sued him for libel. (Photo: Getty Images)
STEPHEN YAXLEY-LENNON, also known as Tommy Robinson, is set to be released from prison within a week after the High Court reduced his 18-month sentence for contempt of court.
The far-right anti-Islam activist was jailed in October after admitting to breaching an injunction that barred him from repeating false claims about a Syrian refugee who had successfully sued him for libel.
The Solicitor General had taken legal action against Yaxley-Lennon for comments made in online interviews and a documentary titled Silenced, which was viewed millions of times and shown in Trafalgar Square in July.
The sentence was made up of a 14-month punitive element and a four-month coercive element. Mr Justice Jeremy Johnson had said the four-month part could be lifted if Yaxley-Lennon complied with the court order to remove Silenced and related content from social media and other platforms.
On Tuesday, Yaxley-Lennon appeared via video link from HMP Woodhill in Milton Keynes. His lawyer, Alex Di Francesco, told the court that Silenced had been removed from accounts under his control and that requests were made to remove other interviews where the false allegations were repeated.
Judge Johnson ruled that Yaxley-Lennon had “purged” his contempt. “The practical effect is that the defendant will be released once he has completed the punitive element, which I understand will be within the next week,” he said. The original release date had been set for 26 July, but it has now been moved up to 26 May.
The judge noted that while there was “an absence of contrition or remorse”, Yaxley-Lennon had given assurances that he would comply with the injunction in the future and understood the consequences of breaching it again. The court accepted that he had shown a “change in attitude” and had taken steps to comply with the order.
Yaxley-Lennon, 42, was jailed for 10 admitted breaches of the injunction after two contempt of court claims were brought against him by the Solicitor General. The injunction was first issued in 2021 after he falsely accused a Syrian teenager in a viral video of being violent. The teenager later won a libel case against him.
He was accused by some media and politicians of inflaming tensions that led to riots across Britain in July and August last year, following the murder of three girls at a dance workshop in Southport.
In January, a post from his social media account claimed that US billionaire Elon Musk was paying some of his legal fees. Musk has not confirmed this.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
The first lady described the law as a "national victory"
US First Lady Melania Trump has welcomed a new law criminalising the non-consensual sharing of explicit images, including AI-generated deepfake content, calling it a major step towards protecting children and families from online exploitation.
The Take It Down Act, signed into law by President Donald Trump, makes it a federal offence to post "intimate images", whether real or digitally fabricated, without the subject’s consent. Under the legislation, individuals found guilty of intentionally distributing such content could face up to three years in prison. The law also compels technology companies to remove the offending material within 48 hours of notification.
The bill, which passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, 409 votes to 2 in the House of Representatives and unanimously in the Senate in February, has been one of the most widely backed pieces of legislation during Trump’s second term in office. It marks the sixth bill signed into law since his re-election, with the administration often favouring executive orders to implement its agenda.
Melania Trump, who has largely kept a low public profile, played a key role in advancing the legislation. The first lady described the law as a "national victory" and stressed its importance in shielding children from harmful online behaviour.
“This legislation is a powerful step forward in our efforts to ensure that every American, especially young people, can feel better protected from their image or identity being abused,” she said. “It will help parents and families safeguard children from online exploitation.”
Melania Trump first appeared publicly in support of the legislation in March during a solo roundtable event on Capitol Hill, where she urged lawmakers to pass the bill. “It’s heartbreaking to witness young teens, especially girls, grappling with the overwhelming challenges posed by malicious online content, like deepfakes,” she said at the time.
The law addresses two main forms of abuse: revenge porn the non-consensual sharing of intimate real images and deepfake pornography, where AI is used to create fake explicit material by inserting someone’s face into pornographic content. These practices have become increasingly common, particularly targeting women and public figures.
Paris Hilton, businesswoman and DJ, publicly supported the legislation, calling it “a crucial step toward ending non-consensual image sharing online”. Major tech firms, including Meta, TikTok and Google, have also backed the new law.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the first lady was “instrumental” in rallying support for the bill and ensuring its passage through Congress.
Despite the strong support, the legislation has attracted criticism from some digital rights organisations. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) warned that the law’s broad scope could have unintended consequences for free speech and privacy.
“While protecting victims of these heinous privacy invasions is a legitimate goal, good intentions alone are not enough to make good policy,” the group said. “As currently drafted, the Act mandates a notice-and-takedown system that threatens free expression, user privacy, and due process, without addressing the problem it claims to solve.”
The Internet Society, another advocacy group for digital privacy, raised concerns that the law could undermine encryption and pose “unacceptable risks to users’ fundamental privacy rights and cybersecurity”.
Critics argue that the bill, while well-intentioned, lacks adequate safeguards to prevent misuse and could result in overreach, affecting legal online content, including LGBTQ+ material, adult entertainment, and political commentary.
Nonetheless, supporters maintain that the new law fills a critical gap in US legislation by targeting a growing form of online abuse and sending a strong message against digital exploitation.