A LIBERAL DEMOCRAT MEP (Member of the European Parliament), who has just returned
from a trip to Kashmir, appears to have rejected negative portrayal of the policies of India’s
prime minister Narendra Modi.
Bill Newton Dunn, who represents the East Midlands, told the BBC’s Today programme that having spoken to a number of people, he had concluded that the “general feeling was Delhi is trying to help Kashmir”.
At one point, the programme’s presenter Mishal Husain expressed her exasperation with Newton Dunn that he had gone to Kashmir with 22 other MEPs on a trip where they had to be escorted by the Indian Army.
“It seems as though you don’t have much of a problem with the restrictions under which this visit took place?” she said.
“Well, I think I understand them,” he responded.
“When there is killing and tensions and civil unrest, I think Modi, the prime minister in Delhi, and the army are trying to calm things down. So, the shops are now open, the internet is open, the telephones are open, things are easing off and getting better.
But there is still a long way to go.”
Last Friday (1), Husain had interviewed Iltija Mufti, daughter of Mehbooba Mufti, the former chief minister of Kashmir who is currently under detention. Mufti said that Modi’s govern
ment “has lost all moral authority”.
“My mother is extremely distressed about the unilateral and illegal decision that the gover-nment of India has imposed on the people of Jammu and Kashmir,” said Mufti. “And she thinks it’s terribly unfair that our rights, our wishes, our consent has been violated and it is something that the entire country is gloating about and getting some sort of sadistic
pleasure, I would say.”
The government’s point of view was put forward by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) spokesman Nalin Kohli, who was asked for “the justification for keeping Kashmir
in a state of partial lockdown”.
Kohli responded: “Life has started coming back to normalcy. Telephones lines in terms of landlines were first restored.
“Internet services are still to be reviewed in terms of whether it should be permitted or not immediately, because we know that terrorists tend to use those networks through the internet and social media which obviously the state has a responsibility to protect the
lives of its citizens.
“With regard to political leaders the vast majority of people who were taken in preventive custody, they have been released since then. Now it would be down to maybe 200 or 300 as compared to over 1,000 in August.”
Newton Dunn appeared on the programme last Sunday (3) when he was reminded by Husain: “Another MEP Chris Davies (who presents NorthWest England), who was initially due to go on this trip, said his invitation was rescinded after he sought unfettered access
to go anywhere and speak to anyone he wanted.”
Newton Dunn made it clear he saw the Kashmir situation rather differently: “Well, the trouble with Chris ... I know him well, he is my pal …but you can’t do that in such
a tense area. The very night we were there six young Bangladeshi workers were lined up and shot. So security is still very tense. Of course, it would be nice to talk to everybody but you can’t do that.”
He was lyrical in describing the beauty of Kashmir: “Well, [it is] a beautiful country. It’s a little bit like Switzerland in the Himalayas: wonderful scenery, trees, lakes but a very troubled difficult thing and a real hotspot.
“What I hadn’t realised before was Kashmir is partly occupied by China, partly by India and partly by Pakistan. So three major countries all competing for this beautiful lush place where the soil is rich. So a lot of tension – a potential world trouble spot.”
He talked of one meeting that the MEPs had in Kashmir: “We were surrounded by security, vast numbers of soldiers protecting us, but I think also keeping order in the street, so that restricted us a bit. But the shops were open part of the time, and we had one very good session in the grounds of a big hotel when civic society were invited to come and meet us.
“And about 200 shopkeepers, teachers, lawyers, businessmen, all sorts of people (came)…we could talk to whoever we liked… it was very much in the open air and there was nobody listening with microphones… I think they were real people.”
Newton Dunn added: “The teachers said they got very excited about their school, they were telling me (about) the kids.
“One businessman said ‘the real problem is Delhi is trying to help us but there is a vast amount of corruption and the money from Delhi doesn’t reach us. It goes off into sticky hands somewhere.’
“But I think the general feeling was Delhi is trying to help Kashmir. It’s had a very hard time for 60, 70 years. [People said] ‘They [Dehi] want to make things better. But we are waiting to see will it actually work or not.’”
Asked by Husain whether the MEPs had asked to talk to opposition leaders in detention, such as two former chief ministers of Jammu & Kashmir, Newton Dunn said they had. But “the general in charge of the army whom we met said, ‘I am not going to allow it,’ so
there was no possibility to argue with him. I would love to go back, but it’s not possible. We were lucky to even get there – we were the first parliamentarians. We were there for just 24 hours. It was something but not nearly enough.”
This point was reiterated by Newton Dunn when he spoke to Eastern Eye: “We didn’t get to talk to many ordinary people because we were surrounded by the army. I asked the general, ‘Is it necessary?’ and he said, ‘Yes, if we lose one of you that would be a major
incident. We don’t want to do that. So we are taking every precaution.’”
However, he said of the meeting with the 200 civic members of society: “I got a feeling that they were optimistic and hopeful that the change that Modi had made might make life better for them.”
The MEPs had a meeting with the Indian prime minister in Delhi, which Newton Dunn said had gone “very nicely”.
“He was very proud that after his first term, he had been reelected. He said proudly that 600 million people had voted which one cannot but be impressed by. More women than ever before (had voted), more women MPs than ever before (had been elected). He said, ‘My ambition for the next five years is a roof for every Indian, electricity for every Indian
and clean drinking water for every Indian.’ And these are very good goals. He is trying hard, I think.
“But, of course, he has got a lot of opposition. It’s very difficult when you have a state of emergency since August, where a lot of people in Kashmir have been locked up or prevented from carrying out their normal business. It’s very difficult for him but having started, I hope he succeeds in finishing.”
Newton Dunn denied he was doing propaganda for Modi: “I am a seeker after truth.”
UK AVIATION engineers are arriving in Thiruvananthapuram to carry out repairs on an F-35B Lightning jet belonging to the Royal Navy, which has remained grounded after an emergency landing 12 days ago.
The jet is part of the HMS Prince of Wales Carrier Strike Group of the UK's Royal Navy. It made the emergency landing at Thiruvananthapuram airport on June 14. The aircraft, valued at over USD 110 million, is among the most advanced fighter jets in the world.
According to a spokesperson for the British High Commission, the aircraft is currently awaiting repairs at the Thiruvananthapuram international airport after it developed an engineering issue.
The UK has agreed to move the aircraft to the Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) facility at the airport.
"The aircraft will be moved to the hangar once UK engineering teams arrive with specialist equipment, thereby ensuring there is minimal disruption to scheduled maintenance of other aircraft," the spokesperson said.
The F-35B is the only fifth generation fighter jet with short takeoff and vertical landing capabilities, which allows it to operate from smaller decks, austere bases and ships.
The official said the aircraft would return to active service once the repairs and safety checks are completed.
"Ground teams continue to work closely with Indian authorities to ensure safety and security precautions are observed. We thank the Indian authorities and Thiruvananthapuram international airport for their continued support."
The aircraft was unable to return to HMS Prince of Wales due to adverse weather conditions.
Engineers from HMS Prince of Wales had assessed the aircraft after the emergency landing and determined that support from UK-based engineering teams was required.
The Indian Air Force had said a few days after the incident that it was providing all necessary support for the "rectification and subsequent return" of the aircraft.
Earlier this month, the HMS Prince of Wales Carrier Strike Group conducted military exercises with the Indian Navy.
In British service, the F-35B is referred to as the 'Lightning'. It is the short takeoff and vertical landing (STOVL) variant of the fighter jet, designed for use from short-field bases and air-capable ships.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Relatives carry the coffin of a victim, who was killed in the Air India Flight 171 crash, during a funeral ceremony in Ahmedabad on June 15, 2025. (Photo: Getty Images)
TWO weeks after the crash of Air India flight AI-171 in Ahmedabad, families of victims are grappling with grief and trauma. Psychiatrists are now working closely with many who continue to oscillate between denial and despair.
The crash occurred on June 12, when the London-bound flight hit the BJ Medical College complex shortly after takeoff, killing 241 people on board and 29 on the ground. Only one passenger survived.
The emotional impact of the incident continues to affect survivors and relatives of those who died.
Counselling support on the ground
In the immediate aftermath, the Department of Psychiatry at B J Medical College deployed a team of psychiatrists—five senior residents and five consultants—across locations including Kasauti Bhavan, the postmortem building, and the civil superintendent's office to support families.
"The accident was unimaginable. Even bystanders were disturbed. Then what must be the condition of someone who lost their loved one?" said Dr Minakshi Parikh, Dean and Head of Psychiatry at BJMC.
"If the people who heard the news were so disturbed, then it is not even within our scope to imagine the state of mind of the family members of people who lost their lives," she told PTI.
Processing grief in stages
As visuals of the crash began to circulate, families arrived in large numbers—many still hoping their relatives had survived. The existence of a lone survivor gave rise to hopes that it might be their loved one.
"There was an uncertainty whether one would be able to identify the loved ones they have lost and wait for matching of the DNA samples for three days. In some cases, samples of another relative of the kin had to be taken. The shock would have logically led to acute stress reactions and post-traumatic stress disorder," said Dr Parikh.
Dr Urvika Parekh, assistant professor and a member of the crisis response team, said denial was the immediate response among many families.
Facing denial and despair
"They kept asking for updates, insisting their family member had survived. Breaking the news gently, while having no confirmation ourselves, was incredibly difficult. We had to provide psychological first aid before anything else," she said.
Parekh said the hope placed on the lone survivor became a coping mechanism. "We had to deal with the denial and explain that nobody could have survived the horrific crash (except one who was not their relative)," she added.
Families were initially reluctant to accept counselling. "It was also difficult to accept the truth without seeing the bodies of their loved ones. Counselling aided them at this critical juncture," Parekh said.
She shared the case of a man who remained silent after losing his wife in the crash. "There was immense guilt—survivor guilt (that he is alive and his wife died). We gave him anti-anxiety medication to help ease the immediate stress. Eventually, he began to speak. He talked about their plans, their memories. It was catharsis. We didn't interrupt—we just let him speak and communicated through silence and empathy,” she said.
Parekh said that listening empathetically was a major part of the process. "We were managing their anger, outburst, and their questions like 'why us' (why did it have to happen to us)," she said.
The wait for DNA results was another major source of distress. With confirmation taking up to 72 hours or more, some families insisted they could identify their loved ones without DNA.
"There was one father who kept saying he didn't need DNA tests—he could identify his son by his eyes," said Parekh. "We had to gently discourage that. Seeing their loved ones in such a state could trigger PTSD and depression. We told them: it's better to remember them with a smile than with charred remains.”
Dr Parikh said the five commonly known stages of grief—denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance—were not experienced in a fixed sequence.
Lingering grief and support
"People cycle through these stages. Someone might accept the loss in the morning and fall back into denial by evening,” said Parekh. "So we mourned with them. That was part of the therapy".
Parekh stays in one of the residential buildings near the crash site. Her building was not damaged.
Some families found the waiting unbearable. One Air India crew member’s family had to wait seven days for DNA confirmation. “The exhaustion, the helplessness—it broke her mentally,” a relative said. “But the counselling helped. Those sessions were our only anchor."
"A calm voice, the right amount of information, and simply being there—these saved a lot of families from spiralling into chaos,” said Dr Parikh.
(With inputs from PTI)
Keep ReadingShow less
Prime minister Keir Starmer delivers a speech at The British Chambers of Commerce Global Annual Conference in London on June 26, 2025. (Photo by EDDIE MULHOLLAND/AFP via Getty Images)
PRIME MINISTER Sir Keir Starmer has admitted he was wrong to warn that Britain could become an "island of strangers" due to high immigration, saying he "deeply" regrets the controversial phrase.
Speaking to The Observer, Sir Keir said he would not have used those words if he had known they would be seen as echoing the language of Enoch Powell's notorious 1968 "rivers of blood" speech.
"I wouldn't have used those words if I had known they were, or even would be interpreted as, an echo of Powell. I had no idea – and my speechwriters didn't know either," he explained. "But that particular phrase – no, it wasn't right. I'll give you the honest truth – I deeply regret using it."
Starmer made the remarks last month while announcing new immigration controls. He had said that without proper rules, "we risk becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together."
The comments sparked fury from Labour MPs and other critics who accused him of copying the language of Powell, the former Tory minister whose inflammatory speech warned that native Britons had "found themselves made strangers in their own country" because of immigration.
Former Labour shadow chancellor John McDonnell said Sir Keir was "reflecting the language of Enoch Powell," while suspended Labour MP Zarah Sultana branded the speech "sickening."
Diane Abbott, Britain's first black female MP, called the phrase "fundamentally racist."
Sir Keir accepted full responsibility for the mistake, saying he should have "read through the speech properly" and "held it up to the light a bit more." He also acknowledged there were "problems with the language" in a policy document where he claimed recent immigration had caused "incalculable" damage to Britain.
The climbdown marks another reversal for the Labour leader, who has faced criticism for changing course on several policies including winter fuel payments and welfare reforms. Just this week he watered down controversial benefit changes to avoid a rebellion from his own MPs.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage seized on the apology as proof that Sir Keir "has no beliefs, no principles and just reads from a script."
Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick said it showed the prime minister "doesn't believe in borders or the nation state."
Despite the backlash when the speech was first delivered, Downing Street had initially defended the comments.
The prime minister's spokesman said they "completely rejected" comparisons to Powell and confirmed Sir Keir stood by his words.
Home secretary Yvette Cooper had also backed the prime minister, arguing his remarks were "completely different" to Powell's and highlighting how he had praised Britain's diversity "in almost the same breath."
London mayor Sadiq Khan and Welsh First Minister Eluned Morgan had both distanced themselves from the language at the time, with Khan saying they "aren't words that I would use."
Keep ReadingShow less
Sir Sajid Javid (Photo by Tom Nicholson-WPA Pool/Getty Images)
A cross-party group has been formed to tackle the deep divisions that sparked last summer's riots across England. The new commission will be led by former Tory minister Sir Sajid Javid and ex-Labour MP Jon Cruddas.
The Independent Commission on Community and Cohesion has backing from both prime minister Sir Keir Starmer and Tory leader Kemi Badenoch. It brings together 19 experts from different political parties and walks of life.
It was set up following the violent unrest that broke out in 27 towns and cities after three young girls were killed in Southport last July. False claims about the attacker's identity spread rapidly on social media, helping to fuel the disorder.
Sir Sajid warned that Britain has become a "tinderbox of division" due to years of neglect. He said governments have only acted when tensions boil over, rather than dealing with the root problems. "We are more disconnected as a country than at any point in our modern history," he told reporters. "There is a pandemic of loneliness that has spread across the country."
According to Javid, who served as communities secretary, home secretary and chancellor in the cabinets of David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson, social cohesion had been treated as a “second tier” issue by successive governments.
“Communal life in Britain is under threat like never before and intervention is urgently needed," he told the Telegraph. "There have been long-term, chronic issues undermining connections within our communities for several decades now, such as the degradation of local infrastructure from the local pub to churches, the weakening of family units, growing inequality, declining trust in institutions and persistent neglect from policy-makers."
He pointed to several factors making the situation worse, including high levels of immigration that haven't been properly managed, rising cost of living pressures, social media spreading extremist views, declining trust in public institutions, and the breakdown of local community spaces like pubs and churches.
Cruddas, who represented Dagenham for over 20 years, said the commission would listen directly to people across Britain rather than impose solutions from Westminster.
Over the next 12 months, the panel will examine what's driving people apart and develop practical recommendations for government. The group includes former West Midlands mayor Sir Andy Street, ex-Green Party leader Caroline Lucas, and counter-extremism expert Dame Sara Khan.
The commission is being supported by the Together Coalition, which was founded by Brendan Cox after his wife, MP Jo Cox, was murdered by a far-right extremist in 2016.
Sir Sajid remains optimistic about Britain's future, saying the country has "phenomenal attributes" to overcome its challenges. The commission aims to create "a vision for communities that all British citizens can buy into."
Keep ReadingShow less
Masum was seen on CCTV trying to steer the pram away and, when she refused to go with him, stabbed her multiple times before walking away and boarding a bus. (Photo: West Yorkshire Police)
A MAN who stabbed his estranged wife to death in Bradford in front of their baby has been convicted of murder.
Habibur Masum, 26, attacked 27-year-old Kulsuma Akter in broad daylight on April 6, 2024, stabbing her more than 25 times while she pushed their seven-month-old son in a pram. The baby was not harmed.
Bradford Crown Court heard that Akter had been living in a refuge since January after Masum threatened her with a knife at their home in Oldham. Masum tracked her using her phone location and confronted her after she left the refuge to meet a friend, believing he was in Spain.
Masum was seen on CCTV trying to steer the pram away and, when she refused to go with him, stabbed her multiple times before walking away and boarding a bus. He was arrested three days later in Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire.
Kulsuma Aktergetty images
Masum, of Leamington Avenue, Burnley, had admitted manslaughter and possession of a knife but denied murder. He was found guilty of murder, stalking, making threats to kill, and assault by beating.
The Crown Prosecution Service said the attack was “planned and premeditated”. West Yorkshire Police described it as a “brutal” daylight attack. Det Ch Insp Stacey Atkinson said Ms Akter “should have been safe”.
The Independent Office for Police Conduct found no breach of standards by officers involved prior to her death. Masum is due to be sentenced on 22 July.