Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Cameron regrets not approaching Sunak formally in Greensill lobbying

A lobbying row has erupted after it was out in public domain that the former prime minister David Cameron has sent texts to chancellor Rishi Sunak and two other ministers seeking help for Greensill Capital.

As reported in Financial Times, a friend of Cameron said he now thinks it would have been better to approach the Treasury by writing a formal letter.


The former Conservative leader is yet to make a comment himself on the matter.

The Treasury on Thursday (8) published two of Sunak's replies to Cameron, where in one the chancellor said he had "pushed the team to explore an alternative".

Reports suggest that Cameron had messaged Sunak multiple times and the chancellor decided to publish his two replies "in order to reassure beyond doubt that there was no wrongdoing and that he acted with integrity and propriety".

Labour's shadow chancellor, Anneliese Dodds, said the messages "raise very serious questions about whether the chancellor may have broken the ministerial code" as they suggested the firm "got accelerated treatment and access to officials".

After leaving office, Cameron worked as an adviser to Greensill Capital, which has now collapsed. The financial firm, a major financer of Sanjeev Gupta-owned Liberty Steel, has now put the future of the steelmaker and its over 5,000 employees at stake.

Last year, working for Greensill, Cameron had texted ministers in the Treasury to appeal for government-backed loans at the outbreak of the pandemic. However, later the requests were rejected by the Treasury.

Cameron was investigated by a watchdog, but was later cleared in March.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

hindu-muslim-uk

The wife initially arrived in the UK in 2022 on a student visa, with her husband joining her as her dependent.

Photo for representation: iStock

Hindu-Muslim couple win damages claim over separation before India deportation

Highlights

  • High Court judge Simon Tinkler rules couple may be owed damages over breach of Article 8 right to family life
  • Couple's asylum challenge was rejected, but their separation in detention was found to be an "unlawful interference"
  • Wife and husband, referred to as FNB and FNN, were detained on 11 September 2025 pending removal to India

A MUSLIM man and his Hindu wife who had sought asylum in the UK on the grounds of feared persecution over their interfaith marriage have won a claim over being separated while in detention ahead of being deported to India.

Keep ReadingShow less