Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Millions of Apple and Samsung users could receive payouts in £480m Qualcomm lawsuit

Landmark case over inflated smartphone prices

Apple and Samsung

UK trial tests power of consumers against global tech giants

iStock

Highlights:

  • Around 29 million UK smartphone users could be eligible for compensation
  • Which? is suing Qualcomm for allegedly inflating handset prices
  • The case could see a £480m payout if the consumer group wins

Consumer group takes Qualcomm to court

Millions of Apple and Samsung users across the UK may soon benefit from a £480 million compensation claim, as consumer watchdog Which? takes chipmaker Qualcomm to court over alleged anti-competitive behaviour.

The case, which opened on Monday at the Competition Appeal Tribunal in London, centres on accusations that Qualcomm charged inflated prices and licensing fees for key smartphone components, forcing manufacturers to pass on the extra costs to consumers.


Who could benefit

If Which? succeeds, around 29 million consumers who bought an Apple or Samsung handset between 1 October 2015 and 9 January 2024 could each receive an estimated £17 per phone.

The claim covers nearly a decade of smartphone purchases and is part of an effort to ensure that major corporations are held accountable for pricing practices that may have unfairly affected customers.

Allegations of market abuse

Which? alleges that Qualcomm abused its dominant market position by forcing Apple and Samsung to agree to inflated terms for chips essential to the operation of their smartphones.

The tribunal will first determine whether Qualcomm held such power and whether it misused it. If the court finds in favour of Which?, a second phase will follow to decide the size and distribution of compensation.

Qualcomm denies the claims

Qualcomm, one of the world’s largest producers of mobile processors, has rejected the allegations, calling the case “baseless”. The company has previously faced similar scrutiny, including an EU fine for antitrust violations and an unsuccessful case by the US Federal Trade Commission, which was dismissed in 2020.

A test of consumer power

Anabel Hoult, Chief Executive of Which?, described the trial as “a huge moment” for consumers:

“It shows how the power of consumers, backed by Which?, can be used to hold the biggest companies to account if they abuse their dominant position.”

With proceedings expected to last five weeks, the case could mark a major milestone for collective consumer rights in the UK and a warning to tech giants about the cost of market dominance.

More For You

Britons

Experts also suggest "leapfrogging" between streaming services rather than maintaining multiple subscriptions simultaneously

iStock

Britons could save £400 a year by cancelling unused subscriptions, research reveals

Highlights

  • 19 per cent of subscribers do not utilise every platform they pay for, with unused Netflix and gym apps draining bank accounts.
  • 31 per cent of Britons plan to review and cancel unused services following Christmas spending squeeze.
  • New consumer protections coming later this year will require companies to remind customers about active subscriptions.

British households could save up to £400 a year by cancelling forgotten subscription services, with families spending as much as £1,200 annually on unused streaming platforms, fitness apps and delivery memberships, according to new research.

A Nationwide survey has revealed that millions are paying for "zombie" subscriptions—neglected exercise apps or unwatched Netflix accounts—with recurring charges quietly draining money from bank accounts each month.

Keep ReadingShow less