PRIME minister Boris Johnson has agreed to a request from the chancellor, Rishi Sunak, for a review to determine whether he stuck to the rules on ministerial declarations.
The move caps days of criticism over the financial arrangements of Sunak’s family and the allegation of “political hypocrisy” as questions emerged over offshore tax havens reportedly held by his wife Akshata Murty, an Indian national.
Sunak was also criticised for a lack of transparency after he admitted to holding a "green card" for US permanent residents until last year.
The chancellor said last Sunday (10) he had written to Johnson asking him to refer his ministerial declarations to Christopher Geidt, the independent adviser on ministers' interests.
Murty, daughter of Indian IT major Infosys co-founder NR Narayana Murthy, said last week she would start paying UK tax on "all worldwide income" as she sought to defuse the controversy over her non-domicile tax status that has cast a shadow on Sunak’s political fortunes.
But Labour frontbench MP Louise Haigh told BBC radio Sunak had "come out on a number of occasions to try and muddy the waters" around his family's tax affairs.
She conceded the non-domicile status enjoyed by Murty - shielding her overseas income from Infosys against UK taxes - was legal.
Haigh, however, queried "whether it was right that the chancellor of the exchequer, whilst piling on 15 separate tax rises to the British public, was benefiting from a tax scheme that allowed his household to pay significantly less to the tune of potentially tens of millions of pounds".
The Independent newspaper reported that Sunak was listed as the beneficiary of trusts set up in the British Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands to help manage his wife's tax and business affairs.
Sunak was listed in 2020 after he became chancellor and after his previous stint as chief secretary to the treasury, the newspaper said.
"No one in Akshata's family is aware of this alleged trust," a spokeswoman close to the Sunak family said in response.
As chancellor, Sunak oversaw a huge programme of government spending during the coronavirus pandemic, but is now tightening the belt just as Britons face the worst cost-of-living crisis in generations.
Once a leading contender to succeed Johnson as the prime minister, Sunak has seen his popularity plummet in recent weeks, and has accused critics of mounting a "smear" campaign against his wife.
Allies of the chancellor have said Johnson's office is waging a political hit job.
They said the prime minister believed Sunak had not backed him strongly enough during an ongoing scandal into Downing Street lockdown parties.
Johnson last Friday (8) denied knowledge of any briefing operation against Sunak, and told reporters his chancellor was doing an "absolutely outstanding job".
The White House meanwhile declined to comment about Sunak's green card, which he said he only gave up ahead of his first visit to the US as the chancellor in October last year.
Under US law, possession of the card meant that Sunak intended to live in America and pay US taxes, despite serving as Britain's second-most powerful politician.
Sunak and Murty met as students in the US and they married in 2009.
Murty, 42, owns shares worth almost a billion dollars in Infosys, according to the company's disclosure to stock exchanges.
This makes her richer than the Queen, whose personal wealth is estimated at £350 million.
The couple owns at least four properties, including a £7m five-bedroom house in upscale Kensington, London, and a flat in Santa Monica, California.
Murty is also the director of venture capital company Catamaran Ventures which she founded with Sunak in 2013.
She confirmed last week that she "is treated as non-domiciled for UK tax purposes", meaning returns from her Infosys stake are only liable for taxation outside Britain.
Sunak told the Sun newspaper that "to smear my wife to get at me is awful".
He said, "it would not be reasonable or fair to ask her to sever ties with her country because she happens to be married to me".
Murty created her own fashion label, Akshata Designs, in 2010.
According to a 2011 Vogue profile, she works with artists in remote villages to create Indian-meets-Western fusion clothes that are "vehicles to discovering Indian culture".
"I believe we live in a materialistic society," she told the magazine. "People are becoming more conscious about the world they live in. Doing good is fashionable."
(Agencies)
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
News
Teachers, nurses warn of strikes over 2.8 per cent pay rise proposal
EasternEye
11 December 2024
More For You
Online gamblers spending £1,000 a day to face new UK checks
Jul 07, 2026
- Gamblers spending more than £1,000 in 24 hours could face financial risk assessments.
- Regulator says the checks are not affordability tests and will not affect credit scores.
- Betting industry warns the changes could push customers towards illegal gambling sites.
Online gambling customers in the UK who spend large sums in a short period could soon face financial risk assessments, under new rules announced by the Gambling Commission. The regulator says the changes are aimed at identifying customers who may be experiencing financial hardship, while the betting industry argues they could drive gamblers towards unregulated operators.
Under the new framework, customers spending more than £1,000 within a 24-hour period or £3,000 over a rolling 90-day period will be eligible for enhanced financial risk assessments. Lower thresholds will apply to gamblers aged under 25, with checks beginning at £750 in 24 hours once the system is fully introduced.
Checks without paperwork
The Gambling Commission said the assessments will use information held by credit reference agencies and will not require customers to submit bank statements, payslips or other financial documents. It also stressed the checks are not affordability assessments and will have no impact on an individual's credit score.
The rollout will begin this summer in phases, initially applying to customers aged over 25 who spend more than £5,000 within a rolling 24-hour period at the largest gambling operators. The regulator said fewer than 0.5 per cent of customers are expected to be affected during the first phase before thresholds are gradually lowered.
Alongside the enhanced checks, lower-level vulnerability assessments will also be introduced. These will use publicly available information, including bankruptcy records, for customers who lose more than £125 over 30 days or £500 over 12 months.
According to the Gambling Commission, people who gamble heavily online are significantly more likely to face financial problems. The regulator said high-spending customers are between two and four times more likely to have a debt management plan and between two and five times more likely to have defaulted on payments during the previous 12 months than the wider population.
Industry pushes back
The reforms stem from the Government's review of the Gambling Act and recommendations made in the 2023 gambling white paper.
Sarah Gardner, acting chief executive of the Gambling Commission, reportedly said the vast majority of customers would never undergo an assessment. She added the new system is intended to identify financially vulnerable customers while keeping the process frictionless for everyone else.
The regulator also pointed to recent enforcement cases where customers were able to deposit large sums without intervention, including one individual who reportedly deposited £25,000 in just 25 days before any action was taken.
However, the proposals have drawn strong criticism from the betting industry.
The Betting and Gaming Council said it was "deeply disappointed and frustrated" by the decision to proceed with the checks. Chief executive Grainne Hurst reportedly argued that concerns over the accuracy of credit reference data, the practical operation of the system and its impact on customers remain unresolved. She also warned the changes could encourage more gamblers to use illegal betting websites.
The British Horseracing Authority also criticised the plans, saying they could subject racing bettors to unnecessary levels of financial scrutiny.
The Gambling Commission said the new measures are designed to better identify customers at risk of financial harm while ensuring most gamblers can continue betting without additional checks.
Keep ReadingShow less






